RTX 3060 low fps

[Crimean]

i see people on youtube play on low settings with more than 70fps but i barely get 45 fps any idea? cpu is i5 11th gen

[Caduryn]

Originally posted by Armadale:

Originally posted by Caduryn:

100% scale.....

you dont even know how to mess with the scale settings. You dont know anything, you think 55 fps average is good. lmao

LOOOOL so ignorant, so full of hate...

[burthole]

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Originally posted by Armadale:

you dont even know how to mess with the scale settings. You dont know anything, you think 55 fps average is good. lmao

LOOOOL so ignorant, so full of hate...

I'm the one full of hate? You are the one hiding in these comments ready to ambush anyone who has a problem with the games terrible optimization. Find a new hobby kid.

[Caduryn]

Originally posted by Armadale:

Originally posted by Caduryn:

LOOOOL so ignorant, so full of hate...

I'm the one full of hate? You are the one hiding in these comments ready to ambush anyone who has a problem with the games terrible optimization. Find a new hobby kid.

But YOU are the one telling everyone they need a 4090 to play 1080p

And at the same time saying a LAPTOP 3060 40fps is because bad optimisation....

Well news Flash: a Laptop 3060 is weaker then a gtx 1070 ti ....

[burthole]

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Originally posted by Armadale:

I'm the one full of hate? You are the one hiding in these comments ready to ambush anyone who has a problem with the games terrible optimization. Find a new hobby kid.

But YOU are the one telling everyone they need a 4090 to play 1080p

And at the same time saying a LAPTOP 3060 40fps is because bad optimisation....

If you aim to enjoy the game at its NATIVE RESOLUTION with a smooth experience, hitting around 90 stable frames, YES, you'll require a 4090 GPU and stick to 1080p resolution. I even provided the GamersNexus video where they conducted all their tests at NATIVE resolution to demonstrate this to you, but it seems you dismissed it without investigating because you don't actually care about facts.

[Caduryn]

Originally posted by Armadale:

Originally posted by Caduryn:

But YOU are the one telling everyone they need a 4090 to play 1080p

And at the same time saying a LAPTOP 3060 40fps is because bad optimisation....

If you aim to enjoy the game at its NATIVE RESOLUTION with a smooth experience, hitting around 90 stable frames, YES, you'll require a 4090 GPU and stick to 1080p resolution. I even provided the GamersNexus video where they conducted all their tests at NATIVE resolution to demonstrate this to you, but it seems you dismissed it without investigating because you don't actually care about facts.

True, i only care about what i see on my PC wile playing Starfield on ultra settings 1440p 100% scale.

Like everyone else should do, NO SINGLE tests of random People will tell me how it runs on MY PC, its that simply

[burthole]

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Originally posted by Armadale:

If you aim to enjoy the game at its NATIVE RESOLUTION with a smooth experience, hitting around 90 stable frames, YES, you'll require a 4090 GPU and stick to 1080p resolution. I even provided the GamersNexus video where they conducted all their tests at NATIVE resolution to demonstrate this to you, but it seems you dismissed it without investigating because you don't actually care about facts.

True, i only care about what i see on my PC wile playing Starfield on ultra settings 1440p 100% scale.

Like everyone else should do, NO SINGLE tests of random People will tell me how it runs on MY PC, its that simply

That's incorrect; your PC is not a unique entity but rather composed of the same components that all our PCs share, and benchmarks do hold significance and value. If you solely cared about your own PC, you wouldn't be here defending Bethesda and even criticizing other community members for expressing their concerns about this poor performance.

Feel free to enjoy your 55fps, and it might be worthwhile to explore the scaling options, perhaps trying 80%, to potentially attain a smoother frame rate.

If I had your fps I would have refunded before I got to the 2 hour mark.

[Caduryn]

Originally posted by Armadale:

Originally posted by Caduryn:

True, i only care about what i see on my PC wile playing Starfield on ultra settings 1440p 100% scale.

Like everyone else should do, NO SINGLE tests of random People will tell me how it runs on MY PC, its that simply

That's incorrect; your PC is not a unique entity but rather composed of the same components that all our PCs share, and benchmarks do hold significance and value. If you solely cared about your own PC, you wouldn't be here defending Bethesda and even criticizing other community members for expressing their concerns about this poor performance.

Feel free to enjoy your 55fps, and it might be worthwhile to explore the scaling options, perhaps trying 80%, to potentially attain a smoother frame rate.

If I had your fps I would have refunded before I got to the 2 hour mark.

Well that seems a you problem, no one needs 300+ fps
60 already is butter smooth

[burthole]

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Originally posted by Armadale:

That's incorrect; your PC is not a unique entity but rather composed of the same components that all our PCs share, and benchmarks do hold significance and value. If you solely cared about your own PC, you wouldn't be here defending Bethesda and even criticizing other community members for expressing their concerns about this poor performance.

Feel free to enjoy your 55fps, and it might be worthwhile to explore the scaling options, perhaps trying 80%, to potentially attain a smoother frame rate.

If I had your fps I would have refunded before I got to the 2 hour mark.

Well that seems a you problem, no one needs 300+ fps
60 already is butter smooth

60 fps is not butter smooth unless you are a sloth.

[Caduryn]

Originally posted by Armadale:

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Well that seems a you problem, no one needs 300+ fps
60 already is butter smooth

60 fps is not butter smooth unless you are a sloth.

Or you got ADHS.....

[burthole]

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Originally posted by Armadale:

60 fps is not butter smooth unless you are a sloth.

Or you got ADHS.....

Make sure you keep playing games at 55-60 fps because right now you are simply unaware of what you are missing playing at higher frames.

[Alvarez_Tiago]

I'm on a 3070ti laptop with a 12700h
The game is running surprisingly well. I get a locked 60 at 1080p ultra/high/medium mixed settings for better visuals high performance.
Dlss mod 80% and FOV mod.

[28k]

Originally posted by Alvarez_Tiago:

I'm on a 3070ti laptop with a 12700h
The game is running surprisingly well. I get a locked 60 at 1080p ultra/high/medium mixed settings for better visuals high performance.
Dlss mod 80% and FOV mod.

60 FPS isn't performance, it's the bottom of the barrel bare minimum for PC gaming.

[Alvarez_Tiago]

Originally posted by 28k:

Originally posted by Alvarez_Tiago:

I'm on a 3070ti laptop with a 12700h
The game is running surprisingly well. I get a locked 60 at 1080p ultra/high/medium mixed settings for better visuals high performance.
Dlss mod 80% and FOV mod.

60 FPS isn't performance, it's the bottom of the barrel bare minimum for PC gaming.

For me it's enough.
I went past the never ending PC upgrades just so I could get that 2 extra frames. I scaled back to a 60fps default and I'm much happier and less frustrated for it.
I also got an i9 9900k/3080 rig and since I don't want to get the high 90s, low 100s fps anymore, I don't have to rush and upgrade that rig as well until I see that I'm having to sacrifice visible fidelity to get to a locked 60 at 1440p.

[Tourette's Guy]

Originally posted by Armadale:

Originally posted by don't.taze.me.bro:

We need your rig specs. Could be something is creating a bottleneck.

nah rig specs not necessary - Starfield is just poorly optimized

90% of AAA videogames are not optimized at all for PC. You can't expect stable 60fps unless you have a 3000€ rig.

They are optimized for consoles.

[burthole]

Originally posted by Tourette's Guy:

Originally posted by Armadale:

nah rig specs not necessary - Starfield is just poorly optimized

90% of AAA videogames are not optimized at all for PC. You can't expect stable 60fps unless you have a 3000€ rig.

They are optimized for consoles.

That's not true because every AAA game I have performs much better than this title. There isn't a game in my Steam library that runs worse than this game.

True console ports like God of War are much better optimized than Starfield.