Starfield

Starfield

View Stats:
briandog Sep 4, 2023 @ 5:49am
RTX 3070 good
So this is running smooth as butter on my 3070, so far anyway.
I think some of you must have very busted ass computers
< >
Showing 1-15 of 31 comments
Rich Sep 4, 2023 @ 5:52am 
Bait thread. It doesnt even run well at 3070 Ti. Also, what settings? What resolution? What resolution scale? Pointless thread.
smashingzwan Sep 4, 2023 @ 5:55am 
Game runs great on my PC.

RTX 3080
AMG Ryzen 7 5800X3d 8-Core Processor 3.4GHz
16GB RAM

Running at 1440 with everything cranked to ultra and the game looks amazing and runs at a consistent 50-60fps.
Last edited by smashingzwan; Sep 4, 2023 @ 5:56am
I mean I can get my 3070 running everything on ultra at 60fps in 1080.

But in 1440 even with FSR on boy it's a struggle to maintain that 60.
Originally posted by smashingzwan:
Game runs great on my PC.

RTX 3080
AMG Ryzen 7 5800X3d 8-Core Processor 3.4GHz
16GB RAM

Running at 1440 with everything cranked to ultra and the game looks amazing and runs at a consistent 50-60fps.

Your 3080 should be doing that at 4k. Not 1440.
gatto_nero Sep 4, 2023 @ 5:59am 
Originally posted by =(e)= Lemonater47:
I mean I can get my 3070 running everything on ultra at 60fps in 1080.

But in 1440 even with FSR on boy it's a struggle to maintain that 60.
How it is possible? As 65% render scale is full hd. You moved resolution slider dont you? You moved it to 100% ?
You guys have DLSS 3.5 on right?
Originally posted by gatto_nero:
Originally posted by =(e)= Lemonater47:
I mean I can get my 3070 running everything on ultra at 60fps in 1080.

But in 1440 even with FSR on boy it's a struggle to maintain that 60.
How it is possible? As 65% render scale is full hd. You moved resolution slider dont you? You moved it to 100% ?

Nah I gotta get on the wrong side of 50% to maintain the same performance. Settings still on ultra of course.

But say 1080, FSR off entirely runs completely fine.

There's some overhead going on to where it ain't perfect even with FSR. Ryzen 7600X cranked to 5.3ghz constantly doesn't change anything.
Originally posted by Andrew, King of the Britons:
You guys have DLSS 3.5 on right?
DLSS 3 doesn't do anything for 3000 series GPUs. 4000 only.

God bless Nvidia and their lack of backwards compatibility.
Jimmy James Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:04am 
Below 60 FPS is not good
Arani Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:04am 
Originally posted by Rich:
(pointless redacted insult) It doesnt even run well at 3070 Ti. Also, what settings? What resolution? What resolution scale? (more pointless redacted insults)
This really. Well, aside from the pointless insults.

I have an OC'd i9-9900k, 16GB RAM, and a 3070-Ti, and I play the game on 3440x1440. Initially I had to take the details down to pretty much exactly minimum to not get choppiness in outside areas. Since the DLSS mod and some further adjustments, I'm now using around minimum/medium settings and it runs smoothly enough, it occasionally dips down to 40-50fps but that's just something I have to live with.

But I mean, let's be honest here. The game is nowhere near visually impressive enough to justify this massive performance requirement. By nowhere near I mean there are games out there that look 10x better and run 5x better while doing it. To say nothing about the mouse lags, the huge movement delay in 3:rd person, the wonky animations (especially jumping), to name but a few things. It's been obvious for a while now but Starfield really sealed it in that their Creation Engine seriously can't keep up at all.

My PC may not be ultra-high end, but it's still really good and can run most modern AAA games at high+ details (RTX off) at 80FPS+. Starfield looks like a game from 5-10 years ago, but runs like one 5 years into the future. The optimization is absolutely horrid here.
Last edited by Arani; Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:07am
pewp🖤 Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:08am 
500 $ graphic card with help of the DLSS of course
the minimum requirements for this game is literally 1070 ti
it means they didn't do anything towards adding details and improving any graphics
TheCr33pur Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:13am 
Originally posted by Arani:
Originally posted by Rich:
(pointless redacted insult) It doesnt even run well at 3070 Ti. Also, what settings? What resolution? What resolution scale? (more pointless redacted insults)
This really. Well, aside from the pointless insults.

I have an OC'd i9-9900k, 16GB RAM, and a 3070-Ti, and I play the game on 3440x1440. Initially I had to take the details down to pretty much exactly minimum to not get choppiness in outside areas. Since the DLSS mod and some further adjustments, I'm now using around minimum/medium settings and it runs smoothly enough, it occasionally dips down to 40-50fps but that's just something I have to live with.

But I mean, let's be honest here. The game is nowhere near visually impressive enough to justify this massive performance requirement. By nowhere near I mean there are games out there that look 10x better and run 5x better while doing it. To say nothing about the mouse lags, the huge movement delay in 3:rd person, the wonky animations (especially jumping), to name but a few things. It's been obvious for a while now but Starfield really sealed it in that their Creation Engine seriously can't keep up at all.

My PC may not be ultra-high end, but it's still really good and can run most modern AAA games at high+ details (RTX off) at 80FPS+. Starfield looks like a game from 5-10 years ago, but runs like one 5 years into the future. The optimization is absolutely horrid here.

Better be extra careful OC it, or will wear out sooner than you think. I been hearing few got their hardware fried. Even if you have good cooling system, still can wear it out.

Just need to be patient and see if they can make the game more stable and smoother. Most games that came out normally need adjustment and polish time to time.

I remember playing Skyrim for the firs time, man talk about alot of bugs and performance back then.
Hunter Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:14am 
Originally posted by Rich:
Bait thread. It doesnt even run well at 3070 Ti. Also, what settings? What resolution? What resolution scale? Pointless thread.
"it doesn't run well on my 3070ti so that must mean it doesn't run well on anyone else who also has a 3070ti" sure bro
_KayEss_ Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:17am 
Originally posted by Rich:
Bait thread. It doesnt even run well at 3070 Ti. Also, what settings? What resolution? What resolution scale? Pointless thread.

Wrong. Works smooth as Butter on my system. 3070 ti
Enclosure Sep 4, 2023 @ 6:19am 
Originally posted by =(e)= Lemonater47:
Originally posted by smashingzwan:
Game runs great on my PC.

RTX 3080
AMG Ryzen 7 5800X3d 8-Core Processor 3.4GHz
16GB RAM

Running at 1440 with everything cranked to ultra and the game looks amazing and runs at a consistent 50-60fps.

Your 3080 should be doing that at 4k. Not 1440.
3080 slower then 4070 and 470 is doing 60ish fps avg 1440p high.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 31 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Sep 4, 2023 @ 5:49am
Posts: 31