Open world Space RPG??? Loadingscreens everywhere...

[JeyZ7]

no open world no maps nothing... this is clearly less immersive than tetris... cuts and loadingscreens everywhere... Bethesda u never fail to dissapoint ur fans... wait what did u said...??? open world (means no loading screens) btw. immersive HUGE universe? i dont say this is a bad game... but... meeeh this is an lite RPG with poor story... and wait... u cant explore in an "Open world Space" Rpg??? spaceship. loadingscreen. new planet loadingscreen... DOORS?? XDDD LOADINGSCREEN.... what is this??? engine from 2000s??? seems like the same all the way just with pretty textures and better motion... Bethesda... sorry... but No Mans Sky is much better than this... great storyline... great graphics performance... just a "loading screen" when u jump to another Planet System and that seems pretty fair if u "warp" to it. Bethesade go and play NMS...

[ケツデカピングー]

the upper part of neon city and the lower part are actually connected by some stairs. but if you use elevator you experience a loading.
pretty dumb

[Wolf]

No incentive to actual try to immerse yourself and not fast travel since there's 20 loading screens involved. And then you fast travel and that's what you do 50% of the game. And people are surprised it got a 7/10

[GoreTiger]

Before anyone makes excuses, they promised an "Unparalleled exploration experience". lmao.

[Pandora's Actor]

Originally posted by JeyZ7:

no open world no maps nothing... this is clearly less immersive than tetris... cuts and loadingscreens everywhere... Bethesda u never fail to dissapoint ur fans... wait what did u said...??? open world (means no loading screens) btw. immersive HUGE universe? i dont say this is a bad game... but... meeeh this is an lite RPG with poor story... and wait... u cant explore in an "Open world Space" Rpg??? spaceship. loadingscreen. new planet loadingscreen... DOORS?? XDDD LOADINGSCREEN.... what is this??? engine from 2000s??? seems like the same all the way just with pretty textures and better motion... Bethesda... sorry... but No Mans Sky is much better than this... great storyline... great graphics performance... just a "loading screen" when u jump to another Planet System and that seems pretty fair if u "warp" to it. Bethesade go and play NMS...

the loading screens are 1-3 seconds. if that bothers you well.. go play nms then. where you cant make your own ship. dont have proper quest or companions. or a proper skill system. and the planets are all the same with the generation being extremely boring. and the creatures are all stupid and make no sense. Go play that if you are bothered by waiting 2 seconds lol

[donut32]

easily the best game of the last 30 years.

[JeyZ7]

Originally posted by GoreTiger:

Before anyone makes excuses, they promised an "Unparalleled exploration experience". lmao.

still it has 0=Zero exploration... Storyline and ways that u need to use.... is no exploration... if u make "space" game... thats a must be... in an open world rpg... even skyrim has 1 million times better open world and exploration... yeah its not in space... but we have 2023 and not 2011... And skryrim engine came out in 2003... they started skyrim in 2004... and it came out 2011... so the engine is almost now 20 years old... if u look on overall time... Starfield is what it is... Bad AF... just pretty on the right places if u dont look behind a corner or turn around... and if u blink enough often u dont even see "loading screens" lol... nahh sorry .... this game made nearly everything wrong u can do as a Space RPG... and they want 60 bucks or 100??? xDD outer worlds was better... and had better open world even it was just 1 map... and NMS is even their start was rough the beste Space exploration RPG... (no NMS is not a sim!!!) nms is action adventure scifi RPG survival game... this game made everything. and has nearly everything done right... its beatuyfull and great gameplay and even storylines and quest are mysterious and funny and great!

[JeyZ7]

Originally posted by Pandora's Actor:

Originally posted by JeyZ7:

no open world no maps nothing... this is clearly less immersive than tetris... cuts and loadingscreens everywhere... Bethesda u never fail to dissapoint ur fans... wait what did u said...??? open world (means no loading screens) btw. immersive HUGE universe? i dont say this is a bad game... but... meeeh this is an lite RPG with poor story... and wait... u cant explore in an "Open world Space" Rpg??? spaceship. loadingscreen. new planet loadingscreen... DOORS?? XDDD LOADINGSCREEN.... what is this??? engine from 2000s??? seems like the same all the way just with pretty textures and better motion... Bethesda... sorry... but No Mans Sky is much better than this... great storyline... great graphics performance... just a "loading screen" when u jump to another Planet System and that seems pretty fair if u "warp" to it. Bethesade go and play NMS...

the loading screens are 1-3 seconds. if that bothers you well.. go play nms then. where you cant make your own ship. dont have proper quest or companions. or a proper skill system. and the planets are all the same with the generation being extremely boring. and the creatures are all stupid and make no sense. Go play that if you are bothered by waiting 2 seconds lol

dude u clearly never played nms xDDD or ur just blind... sorry but nms has everything that SF is missing... everything! even story and quests that are good!!!

[9K]

Open world doesn't mean no loading screens it means that the map is not unlocked through linear progression (You know...like Tomb Raider or old school Halo). You really can just blow constellation off right at the beginning and go do whatever you want wherever you want all alone. That's all open world means it has nothing to do with immersion or cut scenes or load screens.

[Pandora's Actor]

Originally posted by JeyZ7:

Originally posted by Pandora's Actor:

the loading screens are 1-3 seconds. if that bothers you well.. go play nms then. where you cant make your own ship. dont have proper quest or companions. or a proper skill system. and the planets are all the same with the generation being extremely boring. and the creatures are all stupid and make no sense. Go play that if you are bothered by waiting 2 seconds lol

dude u clearly never played nms xDDD or ur just blind... sorry but nms has everything that SF is missing... everything! even story and quests that are good!!!

uh i have played no mans sky (53 hours) which is precisely why i say this. it seems you havent played it though. the quests in nms are confusing asf. and boring as well as its just go here go here go here oh sorry dont have this atlas pas now you need to go here and here and here. and dont forget going from planet to planet takes 30s-1m and sometimes even longer during supercruise. a very long artificial boring loading screen. and after the third planet you have seen it all and its boring.

ya no. this is much much better.

[GoreTiger]

Originally posted by 9K:

Open world doesn't mean no loading screens it means that the map is not unlocked through linear progression (You know...like Tomb Raider or old school Halo). You really can just blow constellation off right at the beginning and go do whatever you want wherever you want all alone. That's all open world means it has nothing to do with immersion or cut scenes or load screens.

Seamless is the definition for true open world with no loading screens. Starfield has a more linear open world where everything is locked into cells/regions. Reason this has a lot of people upset is because it directly goes against what they promised/advertised.

[GoreTiger]

Originally posted by Pandora's Actor:

Originally posted by JeyZ7:

dude u clearly never played nms xDDD or ur just blind... sorry but nms has everything that SF is missing... everything! even story and quests that are good!!!

uh i have played no mans sky (53 hours) which is precisely why i say this. it seems you havent played it though. the quests in nms are confusing asf. and boring as well as its just go here go here go here oh sorry dont have this atlas pas now you need to go here and here and here. and dont forget going from planet to planet takes 30s-1m and sometimes even longer during supercruise. a very long artificial boring loading screen. and after the third planet you have seen it all and its boring.

ya no. this is much much better.

As someone who'se played NMS since release (and actively playing it) You are 100% wrong especially on the "seen it all" comment. For example I just saw a planet combination i'd never seen before the other day and captured a giant tesla ball as a companion on the planet i'd never seen before.

The planets in NMS are a thousand times better then starfield. At least in NMS the entire planet is explorable from the point of landing. At least in NMS you can call down vehicles to help you explore. At least in NMS you can actually fly around the planet.

I got so bored exploring the olympus system moons in sf that I tabbed out of the game for an hour just to scroll through steam. A bunch of empty regions with only 2 kinds of minerals to find and the occasional random outpost, with no vehicle to help you get around faster. Absolutely boring.
But hey, at least you can fast travel to your ship so you can leave the boring planets quicker.

[JeyZ7]

todd howard... said in every interview... open world and FREE Exploration!!! if thats not a 100% lie u all a dumb af whoever says it was not promised... and open world is FREE SEAMLESS all over with some expectations normally everyone can look over... but this game is a RPG in a BOX and its hard locked...

[9K]

Originally posted by GoreTiger:

Originally posted by 9K:

Open world doesn't mean no loading screens it means that the map is not unlocked through linear progression (You know...like Tomb Raider or old school Halo). You really can just blow constellation off right at the beginning and go do whatever you want wherever you want all alone. That's all open world means it has nothing to do with immersion or cut scenes or load screens.

Seamless is the definition for true open world with no loading screens. Starfield has a more linear open world where everything is locked into cells/regions. Reason this has a lot of people upset is because it directly goes against what they promised/advertised.

No that's not what open world means. You're just trying to no true Scotsman the definition of open world. If seamless and open world were the same things you would not hear devs describe their games as "seamless open world", but we do hear that. Many open world games ARE seamless, but those aren't the same thing. Fallout and Skyrim have loading screens like this and they're accepted as open world (go look at the store pages and you'll see the first tag is OPEN WORLD). In Starfield the areas are sectioned off (into world spaces), but they're NOT LOCKED. You can go to them whenever you want. If Bethesda had said there were no load screens then that would be a lie, but describing it as open world isn't that.