1070ti minimum required? are they serious?

[yo paulie]

why get a 10% increase in visual quality compared to games from 5 years ago but demand 150% more power from our computer rigs?

[Ianis]

1070ti is prehistoric at this point.

Why are you crying that you cannot run a AAA title on a 10 year old gpu?

Get a 4090.

[Captain Weegee]

4090 is super expensive :c

[yo paulie]

playing on a simple 1080p computer monitor and 1070ti or something similar is all that is needed to play most modern games at a reasonable 60fps. not everyone wants to splurge big money on the latest GPU for such little visual return in increased performance.

[Liquidsteel]

i have a intel i7 32 gigs ram and a 1060 6 gig vid card and i get consistent 30 to 40 fps after 30 hours f gameplay on medium settings

[pr1mus]

they refuse to optimize the game because they know the cuck mod community will patch the game for them (and add all the good content down the road).

same old same old with Bethesda games.

[doomshadow612]

Why do you think? Money is the short answer. Game's graphics are garbage, it should run 4k/60fps ultra on anything above 2060. Of course the collusion that has taken place within gaming industry ensures that you need 200% more computing power, 200% more SSD space and 200% GPU power to run the trash they pump out every year and claim it's 'revolutionary' The coding part is easy - the insidious nature of the cabal trying to scam you into buying the "next big thing" in CPU/GPU is what truly makes it disgusting. And it will not change anytime soon because people lack the intelligence to understand that their computers have more than enough power to run anything thrown their way - it's the corrupt industry that dictates what you can and cannot run - via software updates, artificial nerfing of GPU capabilities and of course Windows. Microsoft is of course behind all of it. Who else could have enough money/power/monopoly of the market to steer things into the direction they're heading towards?

[Risotto]

Originally posted by party bear:

playing on a simple 1080p computer monitor and 1070ti or something similar is all that is needed to play most modern games at a reasonable 60fps. not everyone wants to splurge big money on the latest GPU for such little visual return in increased performance.

Welcome to PC gaming. Your hardware will eventually become obsolete, and that time is now.

You can opt out of this experience by just getting a console if you can't afford the PC experience.

[Zalzany]

Originally posted by pr1mus:

they refuse to optimize the game because they know the cuck mod community will patch the game for them (and add all the good content down the road).

same old same old with Bethesda games.

Or maybe because its 2023 and you need a new video card. Games is not even out yet and you guys are crying for optimization lol

[Redcord]

dude i have 1080ti and cannot get adequate fps on 1080p/low

let's forget about this unoptimized fallout 4 skin for a while

[pr1mus]

Originally posted by Zalzany:

Or maybe because its 2023 and you need a new video card. Games is not even out yet and you guys are crying for optimization lol

it is literally out right now in "early access" and most certainly won't magically get better optimization in less than 3 days when it officially releases.

Originally posted by Zalzany:

Or maybe because its 2023 and you need a new video card.

a 4090 can't even hit 100 FPS at 1080p, and that's a card that can power Cyberpunk at Ultra max everything with Raytracing at 4K @ 60FPS, what's Starfield's excuse to being so hard to run despite looking the way it does?

[Pandemic]

Originally posted by party bear:

why get a 10% increase in visual quality compared to games from 5 years ago but demand 150% more power from our computer rigs?

oh no a 6 year old gpu runs the game like ♥♥♥♥...who could guess that.

[echoes222]

Originally posted by PISSOFF:

1070ti is prehistoric at this point.

Why are you crying that you cannot run a AAA title on a 10 year old gpu?

Get a 4090.

because graphics are sh1t in this game, mate. BG3 looks better. Effing Cyberpunk looks better :D

[RoboFox]

Originally posted by pr1mus:

a 4090 can't even hit 100 FPS at 1080p, and that's a card that can power Cyberpunk at Ultra max everything with Raytracing at 4K @ 60FPS, what's Starfield's excuse to being so hard to run despite looking the way it does?

That is so obviously not true, as I'm not having any issues running this game with a 3070TI on an Ultra-wide 180 Hz monitor.

[pr1mus]

Originally posted by RoboFox:

Originally posted by pr1mus:

a 4090 can't even hit 100 FPS at 1080p, and that's a card that can power Cyberpunk at Ultra max everything with Raytracing at 4K @ 60FPS, what's Starfield's excuse to being so hard to run despite looking the way it does?

That is so obviously not true, as I'm not having any issues running this game with a 3070TI on an Ultra-wide 180 Hz monitor.

settings? fps? cpu?

[darkholyPL]

'are they serious?'
No they aren't because a 1070ti won't even run this game at anything close to 'playable'.