Another trash game by bugthesda

[shotta]

Imagine paying 300+ Dollars on a videogame that barely runs at 30 fps, and has A.I. Straight outta 2006 … With atrociously boring gameplay. Could never be me.

There's no landing, no takeoff, no flight on the planet. Even to get into the craft, via the ladder, there's a black loading screen 💀 there's no feeling of piloting in space, you're just standing still, like in a neo-geo game.

The NPCs are ridiculous and dressed like clowns, just walk around for 5 minutes and watch them. No charisma among the important characters, and dialogue that's limp as hell. Even if "we play for the RPG aspect", this universe will never rival Skyrim or Fallout.

It's a hyper-restricted and locked-in game

-No map

-No piloting

-Pnj, AI and combat suck

-Graphics from 2013

Another trash 2023 game

[MrCalazans]

Like I said before:

"Tell me lies. Tell me sweet little lies."

This song fits perfectly for Starfield. How disappointing! False marketing as usual. Fortunately, I did not pre order this game. The godd4mn thing costs R$ 300,00 here. Imagine yourself paying US $ 300 for a single game STANDARD EDITION and realising it's not what you expected.

That being said, thanks so much for everyone who recorded their gameplays and shared with us the pros and cons.

Futhermore, they also said NMS at its launch day was way better than Starfield.

According to PC Gamer, its exploration it's too limited for a game which allegedly call itself as an "Open Universe" game.

https://www.pcgamer.com/starfields-planet-exploration-is-way-more-limited-than-i-expected-and-yes-there-are-boundaries/

Honestly, I've been doing some research about this game. Completely disappointed.

Dumb I.A, heavy bugs, bad optimization, blank expression from NPCs, even though they're speaking to you in a happy, angry or sad way.

Needless to say about its exploration...

I won't be playing this for sure!

[Fartex]

seems like a lot of people are expecting a space sim ( like ED, SC) wich this game totally is NOT.
its a space game, hence why you got the fast travel and only need a ship to get to parts you havent been to yet.

[Narnyay]

fortunately that's not a problem for you is it op as you sensibly read/watched reviews before buying right?

[KaBandha]

Originally posted by Fartex:

seems like a lot of people are expecting a space sim ( like ED, SC) wich this game totally is NOT.
its a space game, hence why you got the fast travel and only need a ship to get to parts you havent been to yet.

Since when is being able to land your freaking ship on a planet manually and fly through space in a SPACE EXPLORATION game considered a space sim?

[Carlos Spicywiener]

Originally posted by Narnyay:

fortunately that's not a problem for you is it op as you sensibly read/watched reviews before buying right?

Yes OP. Let them do your thinkin for you

[Carlos Spicywiener]

Originally posted by KaBandha:

Originally posted by Fartex:

seems like a lot of people are expecting a space sim ( like ED, SC) wich this game totally is NOT.
its a space game, hence why you got the fast travel and only need a ship to get to parts you havent been to yet.

Since when is being able to land your freaking ship on a planet manually and fly through space in a SPACE EXPLORATION game considered a space sim?

flight sim. And We were told it wasn't, many moons ago

[Fartex]

Originally posted by KaBandha:

Originally posted by Fartex:

seems like a lot of people are expecting a space sim ( like ED, SC) wich this game totally is NOT.
its a space game, hence why you got the fast travel and only need a ship to get to parts you havent been to yet.

Since when is being able to land your freaking ship on a planet manually and fly through space in a SPACE EXPLORATION game considered a space sim?

since like forever mate. obviously you dont know the difference, but thats ok. after playing this game you will.

[TaKtLo$$]

what i do with this trash game when i buy my graphic card at 6.9.?`hope i get a key i can sell :)

[or10nsharkfin]

Originally posted by MrCalazans:

Like I said before:

"Tell me lies. Tell me sweet little lies."

This song fits perfectly for Starfield. How disappointing! False marketing as usual. Fortunately, I did not pre order this game. The godd4mn thing costs R$ 300,00 here. Imagine yourself paying US $ 300 for a single game STANDARD EDITION and realising it's not what you expected.

I know this is going to make me sound like I'm shilling for the company but, when people are referring to the "lies" are they actually false statements and promises made?

Because, I'm looking at all of the pre-release and reveal media that's been trickled down to us over the last year and, I really, really don't see anything that they specifically lied about. Everything that Todd Howard has said would be in this game, is in the game. At the very least it was understandable with Fallout 76. It was unnecessary, broken at launch, and overhyped for what it actually was.

With Starfield, it wasn't Bethesda making it out to be a space sim, it seemed like it was actually gamers placing those expectations on it because it's a space exploration RPG.

Todd Howard told us it would have 1000 planets across many star systems. The vast majority of those planets would be procedurally generated. This fact is true in the game.

I have had maybe one or two character animation glitches in my entire playthrough where someone wouldn't be positioned correctly on a chair.

My only real criticism is that it's still using an evolution of the Creation Engine.

So, I want to ask, are they "lying" because the game isn't what you expected it to be, or are they lying because there's a whole lot of misrepresentation of what was talked about versus what's actually in the final product?

[tyke]

Originally posted by Fartex:

seems like a lot of people are expecting a space sim ( like ED, SC) wich this game totally is NOT.
its a space game, hence why you got the fast travel and only need a ship to get to parts you havent been to yet.

People mainly expected a BSG game and it has none of the sense of an explorable interesting world which those have. It's just garbage.

Yesterday I had to force myself to keep playing and not go and continue playing Police Contraband, which I started the other day
https://store.steampowered.com/app/756800/Contraband_Police/

Again today I've had to force myself to Starfield, and 4 times I have had to take a break and go and drive around in Forza Horizon instead

[EmZ]

Originally posted by Fartex:

seems like a lot of people are expecting a space sim ( like ED, SC) wich this game totally is NOT.
its a space game, hence why you got the fast travel and only need a ship to get to parts you havent been to yet.

So by that logic gta is a car sim since you can drive cars? Dont need to be a space sim to let us use spaceships for something more than dull combat or landing/take off animation

[Caduryn]

Anyone saying it has 2013 Graphics for sure wasnt born in 2013 and never saw a 2013 Game

[MrCalazans]

Originally posted by or10nsharkfin:

Originally posted by MrCalazans:

Like I said before:

"Tell me lies. Tell me sweet little lies."

This song fits perfectly for Starfield. How disappointing! False marketing as usual. Fortunately, I did not pre order this game. The godd4mn thing costs R$ 300,00 here. Imagine yourself paying US $ 300 for a single game STANDARD EDITION and realising it's not what you expected.

I know this is going to make me sound like I'm shilling for the company but, when people are referring to the "lies" are they actually false statements and promises made?

Because, I'm looking at all of the pre-release and reveal media that's been trickled down to us over the last year and, I really, really don't see anything that they specifically lied about. Everything that Todd Howard has said would be in this game, is in the game. At the very least it was understandable with Fallout 76. It was unnecessary, broken at launch, and overhyped for what it actually was.

With Starfield, it wasn't Bethesda making it out to be a space sim, it seemed like it was actually gamers placing those expectations on it because it's a space exploration RPG.

Todd Howard told us it would have 1000 planets across many star systems. The vast majority of those planets would be procedurally generated. This fact is true in the game.

I have had maybe one or two character animation glitches in my entire playthrough where someone wouldn't be positioned correctly on a chair.

My only real criticism is that it's still using an evolution of the Creation Engine.

So, I want to ask, are they "lying" because the game isn't what you expected it to be, or are they lying because there's a whole lot of misrepresentation of what was talked about versus what's actually in the final product?

Its exploration is completely limited as far as I've seen. Each world has those boundaries and many of them is pretty empty.

[Baaaal]

If it barely runs at 30fps, maybe you should have spent those 300 dollars on upgrading your potato

[tyke]

Originally posted by Caduryn:

Anyone saying it has 2013 Graphics for sure wasnt born in 2013 and never saw a 2013 Game

Starfield is not a nice looking game. Some pretty good looking games came out in 2013. The Last Of Us, GTA5, Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite. Starfield isn't far off those and arguably looks a lot worse in terms of just being good looking grpahically. Starfield has higher technical visual fidelity of more polygons (at least in some scenes; a lot of Starfield what you're looking at is far less so than 2013 games), higher resolution textures etc, sure, but there were better looking games in 2013.

edit oh and Crysis 3 released in 2013