Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The game has terrible optimisation, and average fps is totally not justified by the level of detail in the game, ESPECIALLY in space. It's laughable, and I would imagine their engine is to blame.
Did anyone here really think the game would be optimized when Bethesda couldn't be bothered to implement an FOV slider or proper HDR support and took a fat bag of money from AMD as an incentive to not include DLSS?
I got some bridges to sell to you guys
I personally couldn't bear it, at least not with the level of detail the game is currently offering.
There is most certainly something in the background that is drawing more power than it should be doing. We'll probably find that out when modding support comes out in full swing.