Starfield - DLSS vs DLSS 3 vs Native Performance Comparison (200fps+)

[FuryX]

Not my video, but i thought this video shows a great example of what we are missing out on nvidia side.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvCR0jIYJSM
2hours for DLSS + XeSS
24 hours for DLSS Frame Generation.

This video shows DLSS, and you can see all the improvements and how clean the image gets even over Native.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkV3LwH5EGU

[LeftPaw]

Originally posted by FuryX:

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

The DLSS mod that is up for grabs is suppose to have come from Bethesda or given the go ahead by Bethesda. Apparently they sent the specs needed to a the modder weeks before release.

100% false.

I either read it in a article or got it from you tube, and their info may very well be false but who are you to say it's false? Give me evidence. If you are 100% positive it false you must have evidence.

[FuryX]

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

Originally posted by Masheen:

This was the DLSS2 mod btw: Starfield Upscaler on Nexus Mods

https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/111

Apparently one of them has problems and it's the DLSS bridge one that works. The one I linked.

What are u talking about? PureDarks one works fine.

[LeftPaw]

Originally posted by FuryX:

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

Apparently one of them has problems and it's the DLSS bridge one that works. The one I linked.

What are u talking about? PureDarks one works fine.

It says in the comments on both mods that the interface on one can cause crashes and then goes on to recommend the bridge version. Read them for yourself.

[Big Chaddus87]

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

Originally posted by FuryX:

100% false.

I either read it in a article or got it from you tube, and their info may very well be false but who are you to say it's false? Give me evidence. If you are 100% positive it false you must have evidence.

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

Originally posted by FuryX:

100% false.

I either read it in a article or got it from you tube, and their info may very well be false but who are you to say it's false? Give me evidence. If you are 100% positive it false you must have evidence.

I'm active on the PureDark discord and he himself said he has no idea who came up with that bunch of BS

[Phat Monkey]

Just tried the PureDark DLSS 3, works very well, there is a little light flickering some people have managed to sort it in the StarfieldUpscaler.ini. My FPS in Atlantis on a 4090 went from 60+ to 98+ and I have not lowered the resolution scale either, it is set to 100%.

[LeftPaw]

Originally posted by Phat Monkey:

Just tried the PureDark DLSS 3, works very well, there is a little light flickering some people have managed to sort it in the StarfieldUpscaler.ini. My FPS in Atlantis on a 4090 went from 60+ to 98+ and I have not lowered the resolution scale either, it is set to 100%.

Which ever one suits then go with it, I only relay info I am not the source and am only trying to help.
One has a interface, I expect that to be Puredarks, the other just replaces FSR2 and has no interface and problems were reported with said interface. And that is all I have to say on the subject. Do as you see fit.

[PopinFRESH]

Originally posted by IHaveNoMercy:

Wait, why DONT we have DLSS?

Because AMD paid Microsoft/Bethesda to not implement it... but "there is nothing preventing them from implementing it".

[Aurummorituri]

Originally posted by Handsome Squidward:

Originally posted by IHaveNoMercy:

Wait, why DONT we have DLSS?

The likely reason is because they need the game to run on Xbox. DLSS only works on Nvidia GPUs, and all consoles besides Switch use AMD. Even if they didn't, fsr works on a bunch if hardware, so yeah it's much worse but more accessible.

The likely reason is because they need the game to suck AMD dong for that munee. DLSS works on plenty of games also on Xbox. FSR works but is plainly inferior. I have DLSS from the mod and it looks so much better. Also, one guy patched it in himself, so those garbage "it takes too many dev resources" or "it's not open source so hard to do" arguments are dead.

[PopinFRESH]

Originally posted by Handsome Squidward:

Originally posted by IHaveNoMercy:

Wait, why DONT we have DLSS?

The likely reason is because they need the game to run on Xbox. DLSS only works on Nvidia GPUs, and all consoles besides Switch use AMD. Even if they didn't, fsr works on a bunch if hardware, so yeah it's much worse but more accessible.

Those are only reasons why they'd include FSR, not why they would exclude DLSS.

[MishaXG]

Have to admit that no DLSS by devs is a BIG joke!
How are we supposed to play games properly when we buy "high end PC" if now it's starts to become "only AMD" or "only Nvidia" games kind of things...
Overall the game is cool atm, but basically Nvidia 4000 series no really supported is a big black point.

Not to mention that modders day 1 release a mod to incorporate DLSS... sadly DLSS 3 is a paid thing... when you buy a game 100 euros man you won't have to go on a modder page or what ever else to be able to play the game in the best way your computer should handle it...
Retarded move from Bethesda honnestly... i hope they'll change that soon.

[PopinFRESH]

Originally posted by Aurummorituri:

Originally posted by Handsome Squidward:

The likely reason is because they need the game to run on Xbox. DLSS only works on Nvidia GPUs, and all consoles besides Switch use AMD. Even if they didn't, fsr works on a bunch if hardware, so yeah it's much worse but more accessible.

The likely reason is because they need the game to suck AMD dong for that munee. DLSS works on plenty of games also on Xbox. FSR works but is plainly inferior. I have DLSS from the mod and it looks so much better. Also, one guy patched it in himself, so those garbage "it takes too many dev resources" or "it's not open source so hard to do" arguments are dead.

To be clear, you're saying that games that are on Xbox and PC can have DLSS implemented; not that DLSS works on Xbox.

[MBBasar]

My eyes could not recognize and difference between fsr and dlss. And in the video fps also same both of them. So could not decide which one should I use. :/

[FuryX]

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

Originally posted by FuryX:

100% false.

I either read it in a article or got it from you tube, and their info may very well be false but who are you to say it's false? Give me evidence. If you are 100% positive it false you must have evidence.

You read an article that was fabricated. Source? PureDark himself, he was getting tired of people making up ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ articles and random reddit threads about it. It was demeaning the effort he put into his mod. When he said he can do it so quickly, he went into detail on why he was able to do it, it has nothing to do with Bathesda leaking a secret copy behind AMD's back to get DLSS support. This isn't some jason bourne movie.

[FuryX]

Originally posted by LeftPaw:

Originally posted by FuryX:

What are u talking about? PureDarks one works fine.

It says in the comments on both mods that the interface on one can cause crashes and then goes on to recommend the bridge version. Read them for yourself.

I don't need to read, i have them both, and i have no issue with either. One just has DLSS3, the other has DLSS2., its great there is more than one person doing this, but doesn't mean one is somehow 'inferior'. Those people on those threads, this is their first time even trying a mod and don't know how to properly install it.

[FuryX]

Originally posted by Phat Monkey:

Just tried the PureDark DLSS 3, works very well, there is a little light flickering some people have managed to sort it in the StarfieldUpscaler.ini. My FPS in Atlantis on a 4090 went from 60+ to 98+ and I have not lowered the resolution scale either, it is set to 100%.

Nice at 100% its effectively DLAA :)