Put DLSS

[lellollo]

Modders that already put dlss in this game have shown that the image quality is much better, even if the fps are almost the same. Some FG from dlss 3 would be usefull against this heavy to run game. Even cyberpunk seems light if conoared to this one

[Tachyon]

I've applied this mod {https://www.dexerto.com/tech/how-to-add-dlss-to-starfield-on-pc-step-by-step-mod-guide-2274531/} - works like a charm!

Running capped 60 fps (Nvidia control panel) @ 1440p
High Preset (62% Scale) - very smooth & stable now.
Dynamic Resolution OFF - Variable Rate Shading OFF - Motion Blur OFF
Spec: Asus Zephryus M16 Duo/6900hx/32GB Ram/3080ti 16GB Vram - 2TB Gen 4 SSD

This is around 900p with 60-80% GPU utilisation - leaving headroom for spikes & optimisation issues. I don't know what the 1% fps figure is, but not seeing any fps drops as when using FRS. IMHO - Visuals are still good and the game runs so much better - hopefully we see some optimisations soon from the developer...

[Slackerdude74]

It's an AMD sponsored game just deal with it.

[Tachyon]

Originally posted by ghosty74:

It's an AMD sponsored game just deal with it. :cozybethesda:

I reckon it is dealt with....always room for improvement though :-)

[Selfish Lee Everett]

Originally posted by Tachyon:

I've applied this mod {https://www.dexerto.com/tech/how-to-add-dlss-to-starfield-on-pc-step-by-step-mod-guide-2274531/} - works like a charm!

Running capped 60 fps (Nvidia control panel) @ 1440p
High Preset (62% Scale) - very smooth & stable now.

So you are downscaling from 1440 with that card?

[Cicizen]

Originally posted by ghosty74:

It's an AMD sponsored game just deal with it. :cozybethesda:

Nothing to do with AMD sponsored game.
AMD told that their are not stopping Nvidia to add DLS, so idk. We can hope it will eventually comes

[Tachyon]

Originally posted by Selfish Lee Everett:

Originally posted by Tachyon:

I've applied this mod {https://www.dexerto.com/tech/how-to-add-dlss-to-starfield-on-pc-step-by-step-mod-guide-2274531/} - works like a charm!

Running capped 60 fps (Nvidia control panel) @ 1440p
High Preset (62% Scale) - very smooth & stable now.

So you are downscaling from 1440 with that card?

______________________________________

Yes - net effect is a DLSS setting of somewhere between Quality & Balanced (62%) @ base resolution of 2560x1440 - I played around with higher/lower scale figures and various graphics settings - but found the games own high preset to actually be the sweet spot for visuals & performance for this particular rig. One has to experiment as always with DLSS....its not perfect....just happy it works in this mod :-)


DLAA = 100% Render Resolution Scale
DLSS Quality = 67% Render Resolution Scale
DLSS Balanced = 58% Render Resolution Scale
DLSS Performace = 50% Render Resolution Scale
DLSS Ultra Performace = 33% Render Resolution Scale

[lellollo]

Originally posted by Tachyon:

I've applied this mod {https://www.dexerto.com/tech/how-to-add-dlss-to-starfield-on-pc-step-by-step-mod-guide-2274531/} - works like a charm!

Running capped 60 fps (Nvidia control panel) @ 1440p
High Preset (62% Scale) - very smooth & stable now.
Dynamic Resolution OFF - Variable Rate Shading OFF - Motion Blur OFF
Spec: Asus Zephryus M16 Duo/6900hx/32GB Ram/3080ti 16GB Vram - 2TB Gen 4 SSD

This is around 900p with 60-80% GPU utilisation - leaving headroom for spikes & optimisation issues. I don't know what the 1% fps figure is, but not seeing any fps drops as when using FRS. IMHO - Visuals are still good and the game runs so much better - hopefully we see some optimisations soon from the developer...

you definetly are a pro, thanks for the information!

[locustolf]

Did any of you right click the game.exe file and disable full screen optimization? Seemed to help a lot from what I have gathered.

I get 60 fps in some spots and 110 fps in others. 2080ti, no dlss mod, no fsr, no scaling, high/med presets, no dynamic resolution, no VRS, and no motion blur. 60fps in space typically. 100+ fps in cave etc, and 50-60fps in certain towns/cities. 1440p 11700kf. Should note, my ram, GPU, and CPU are all overclocked.

[256shadesofgrey]

As long as DLSS is a closed tech that none of the other GPU manufacturers are allowed to implement, it should be boycotted. Until they change that FSR>DLSS, even if it's not true for image quality. As such there should be more game studios that refuse to implement it. The nvidia fanboys with their support for closed ecosystems are going to ruin gaming in the long run.

[lellollo]

Originally posted by 256shadesofgrey:

As long as DLSS is a closed tech that none of the other GPU manufacturers are allowed to implement, it should be boycotted. Until they change that FSR>DLSS, even if it's not true for image quality. As such there should be more game studios that refuse to implement it. The nvidia fanboys with their support for closed ecosystems are going to ruin gaming in the long run.

bro, DLSS uses neuronal accelerators. It's a hardware component that is responsable for AI into NVIDIA's latest gpus. That's why it's not open sourse as FSR

[patrick68794]

Already confirmed for an upcoming update

[Langkard]

DLSS only helps Nvidia owners. It does nothing for AMD or Intel owners. Just as Intel's XeSS only helps Intel owners. At least AMD's FSR is open source. Not that AMD hasn't also done its share of proprietary bullying in the past.

If I choose to do so, I can get 145+ fps in Starfield in 4K with mixed high/ultra settings on my AMD card, so it doesn't matter to me. Sadly, Starfield has issues when going above 60 fps with things like NPCs floating in the air, so I have it throttled to 60 and use all ultra.

[patrick68794]

Originally posted by Langkard:

DLSS only helps Nvidia owners. It does nothing for AMD or Intel owners. Just as Intel's XeSS only helps Intel owners. At least AMD's FSR is open source. Not that AMD hasn't also done its share of proprietary bullying in the past.

If I choose to do so, I can get 145+ fps in Starfield in 4K with mixed high/ultra settings on my AMD card, so it doesn't matter to me. Sadly, Starfield has issues when going above 60 FPS with things like NPCs floating in the air, so I have it throttled and use all ultra.

XeSS has a GPU agnostic implementation

[Langkard]

Originally posted by patrick68794:

Originally posted by Langkard:

DLSS only helps Nvidia owners. It does nothing for AMD or Intel owners. Just as Intel's XeSS only helps Intel owners. At least AMD's FSR is open source. Not that AMD hasn't also done its share of proprietary bullying in the past.

If I choose to do so, I can get 145+ fps in Starfield in 4K with mixed high/ultra settings on my AMD card, so it doesn't matter to me. Sadly, Starfield has issues when going above 60 FPS with things like NPCs floating in the air, so I have it throttled and use all ultra.

XeSS has a GPU agnostic implementation

It does? Well, I guess that's possible while still not being open source. I'm not a big fan of Intel. For years they left an abandoned shell of a $127 million unfinished office building in downtown Austin, Texas in the early 2000's as a result of the dot com bubble burst. They could at least have demolished it instead of leaving it as an eyesore. Finally the federal government closed a deal to buy the site for a new federal courthouse.

[lellollo]

Originally posted by Langkard:

DLSS only helps Nvidia owners. It does nothing for AMD or Intel owners. Just as Intel's XeSS only helps Intel owners. At least AMD's FSR is open source. Not that AMD hasn't also done its share of proprietary bullying in the past.

If I choose to do so, I can get 145+ fps in Starfield in 4K with mixed high/ultra settings on my AMD card, so it doesn't matter to me. Sadly, Starfield has issues when going above 60 fps with things like NPCs floating in the air, so I have it throttled to 60 and use all ultra.

M8, DLSS works due to neuronal accelerators which are a hardware component of RTX gpus. These are responsable for AI into NVIDIA’s products. AMD and Intel’s gpus do not have AI, so of course it cannot work on that hardware