I read the IGN 7.0 review and it doesn't at all seem balanced

[Dewsplash]

It spends 95% of the time talking about the negative. Giving very little info on what's good. I thought the score was going to be a 4 or under based on what I was reading. I mean a 7.0 is a "good" game with more good than bad. I'm not saying the criticisms are invalid its just the other reviews I read seemed to be more fair in their time spent on the good and bad. Coming from someone who doesn't really care if its a GOTY type game or not.

[Gideon]

Do you also get steak reviews from vegans?

[Ironwu]

Dewsplash の投稿を引用：

It spends 95% of the time talking about the negative. Giving very little info on what's good. I thought the score was going to be a 4 or under based on what I was reading. I mean a 7.0 is a "good" game with more good than bad. I'm not saying the criticisms are invalid its just the other reviews I read seemed to be more fair in their time spent on the good and bad. Coming from someone who doesn't really care if its a GOTY type game or not.

You're right. It was way to positive about the game. Should have been 4/10

[ChrisPharmD]

Let's be real, if IGN gave Starfield a 9/10, everybody here would be like, "IGN are geniuses. They are intelligent human beings with no Nintendo bias."

[puppet74]

ChrisPharmD の投稿を引用：

Let's be real, if IGN gave Starfield a 9/10, everybody here would be like, "IGN are geniuses. They are intelligent human beings with no Nintendo bias."

no ur just have a different type of person on here, like sony fan boys saying ign suck , there have been paid off ext.

[ChrisPharmD]

puppet74 の投稿を引用：

ChrisPharmD の投稿を引用：

Let's be real, if IGN gave Starfield a 9/10, everybody here would be like, "IGN are geniuses. They are intelligent human beings with no Nintendo bias."

no ur just have a different type of person on here, like sony fan boys saying ign suck , there have been paid off ext.

Okay, and? I'm like a lot of people. I'm unlike a lot of people.

[PopinFRESH]

Wybrem の投稿を引用：

The game looks like a ps3 game lets be honest and runs terribly. It looks boring and has no soul.

DF's early pre-review for the console versions show it runs very well and is pretty much a locked 30fps other than a couple dips in two of the largest cities.

[KalGimpa]

reviewers are humans

they are going to have differing opinions

what people should do is find a reviewer that likes the same games as them

that way they can listen to someone they agree with and make an informed decision

[Æsir]

100 XboxAddict
100 IGN Spain
100 Game Rant
100 Washington Post
100 GAMINGbible
100 GamingBolt
100 Het Nieuwsblad
100 Hey Poor Player
100 Attack of the Fanboy
100 Generación Xbox
100 SomosXbox
97 MondoXbox
95 Atomix
95 CGMagazine
95 IGN Brasil
94 Hobby Consolas
91 Gaming Age
90 Gamer.nl
90 Worth Playing
90 TheXboxHub
90 But Why Tho?
90 Carole Quintaine
90 DualShockers
90 Gamereactor UK
90 GAMES.CH
90 GamingTrend
90 Press Start Australia
90 Screen Rant
90 Siliconera
90 We Got This Covered
90 Windows Central
90 Jeuxvideo.com
90 Game Informer
85 Multiplayer.it
85 NPR
82 WellPlayed
80 GamePro Germany
80 The Enemy
80 TRG
80 TheGamer
80 Malditos Nerds
80 GamesHub
80 Inverse
80 Stevivor
80 Trusted Reviews
80 ZTGD
70 GameSpot
70 Digital Trends
70 PCMag
65 The So Videogames Podcast

[Mentally Unstable]

I trust IGN's criticisms for the most part (especially the lack of a city map) though I reserve judgement for things like the inventory and weapons. However, I do not agree that it warrants a 70. To me, it sounds more like an 80.

I fully expected the criticism about barren planets. I had this concern even before we had the first starfield showcase. That's why I wasn't mad about there being limited sectors or boundaries. Because there isn't much point to exploring the whole planet if there's nothing unique awaiting players.

[The_Natural]

The IGN guy who gave starfield a 7.5 gave Marvel: Midnight Suns an 8. His opinion doesn't count.

[Mad Max]

Bethesda didn't send IGN a check.

[puppet74]

The_Natural の投稿を引用：

The IGN guy who gave starfield a 7.5 gave Marvel: Midnight Suns an 8. His opinion doesn't count.

he gave prey a 4 so yeah

[wildcardbitches]

Everything negative brought up in the written IGN review is a big deal for me. I play ES or FO to explore a wide open world full of hidden secrets and loot. This game basically doesn't have that at all. That a HUGE negative for me.

Some people probably play these games and mostly just stick to the main quest and side quests. Apparently that's this games bright spot. So someone could say I don't care about that exploration crap and think this is the best game in a long time.

Honestly to me this game sounds like Mass Effect/Outer Worlds with a bunch of crappy empty copy/paste content thrown in to say "we have 1000 worlds to explore"

[puppet74]

wildcardbitches の投稿を引用：

Everything negative brought up in the written IGN review is a big deal for me. I play ES or FO to explore a wide open world full of hidden secrets and loot. This game basically doesn't have that at all. That a HUGE negative for me.

Some people probably play these games and mostly just stick to the main quest and side quests. Apparently that's this games bright spot. So someone could say I don't care about that exploration crap and think this is the best game in a long time.

Honestly to me this game sounds like Mass Effect/Outer Worlds with a bunch of crappy empty copy/paste content thrown in to say "we have 1000 worlds to explore"

i mean from what i've read you can still go in one direction for like 40min before you hit an invisible wall. so at the end of the day, you have a bigger game than fo4 but its split up into planets , thus they create loading zones. I get thats not as much fully open world, but i mean what can you do when you have a game based on traveling around planets as the goal.