Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This guy does 100% achievement reviews.
I think.. 2? review sites gave it 7, pretty much everyone gave it 8-10
tbh i think you just read the same people talking about the exact same review, the IGN review.
Wide but shallow. Main questline outshined by side content. Word mostly instanced and separated into tiles and chunks.
This much I expected. I was hopeful but I expected this.
What I was looking for however is the strength of core systems like combat.
Because while modders fixed mostly everything related to locations, quests and balance they never were truly able to fix Skyrim's awful combat.
And those core systems get universal praise. So the game will make for an excellent mod vehicle. That is what I was looking for.
its a 90 on metacritic for PC, how high did you want it lol
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2023/08/31/starfield-review-pc-it-is-what-you-wanted-it-to-be/?sh=7c9532cb2d89
I dont care what other "Reviewers" say. I will make my own review.
What are you talking about? the majority are 9+s. There is like 4 7s and 6 8s (converting percentages to numbers for consistancy.
What are you on about? The game is getting great reviews, youtubers like ACG like it and it has an average of 88% from critics on Metacritic and 87% on xbox.
7/10 Saudi Gamer
7/10 Digital Trends
7/10 PCGamesN
7/10 Gamespot
7/10 IGN
looks rough shiesh