40-55 fps in towns at 1440p on a 2080ti and FSR2 enabled

[bulldog0890]

woo boy, thats some garbage right there

[hgshurtugal01]

I don't bother with 60 FPS for that reason.

[Maizel]

Publicado originalmente por morph113:

Publicado originalmente por Toyosatomimi no Miko:

A six year old card that Bethesda said is the recommended card. So you'd expect it to be able to get a solid 60FPS at least.

On ultra settings and 1440p resolution? I don't think so.

I don't think OP claimed it was ultra settings.

[FullMetalPanic]

Too little info. You can have a 2080ti but if your running 8GB and a 7700K with it.....

Also....FSR in what setting? And how stable is it. If it doesn't stutter that helps a LOT.

Also as far as I know a 2080Ti can't run resizeble BAR.

[Silverlight]

Publicado originalmente por Maizel:

Publicado originalmente por morph113:

On ultra settings and 1440p resolution? I don't think so.

I don't think OP claimed it was ultra settings.

If anyone wants to follow this thread, I'll post my benchmark when the games comes out

I'll make this game run silk smooth on the 2080ti at at least 60. Mostly high settings.

[Toyosatomimi no Miko]

Publicado originalmente por Bellen:

Publicado originalmente por Toyosatomimi no Miko:

Look, I hate video game journalists for the failed political activists they usually are, and would love to have them all executed by being launched into the sun or other sufficiently violent method. But using the RECOMMENDED SPECS and writing an article based on that talking about performance is not good grounds to fire someone.

It will be when we find out they had Firefox with 373726 tabs running during this test

Dawg, just take the loss on this one. Game no run good in cities. Past Bethesda titles had this issue of bad optimization for the time as well, especially so with Fallout 76 and 4.

[Silverlight]

Publicado originalmente por Toyosatomimi no Miko:

Publicado originalmente por Bellen:

It will be when we find out they had Firefox with 373726 tabs running during this test

Dawg, just take the loss on this one. Game no run good in cities. Past Bethesda titles had this issue of bad optimization for the time as well, especially so with Fallout 76 and 4.

Nah. I'm gonna put the L on OP here.

It's fine to create dread click articles based on rumors and ChatGPT generated stats.

I don't have to listen

People tried this right as CP was launching too.

[morph113]

Publicado originalmente por sL3nd3rMann:

Publicado originalmente por morph113:

On ultra settings and 1440p resolution? I don't think so.

It says in the initial op post. And FSR 2 enable. So its not 1440p.
It might be 1080p or even 720p depends if its quality or balanced or performance.

Yes we know how upscaling works. Doesn't change the fact that OP provides very little details or even any source. LIke what were the rest of the specs? What CPU was used? What settings was the game running at? Depending on the game, ultra settings can be very demanding and you may need top hardware for it. It was clear that recommended specs were not meant for ultra settings, they rarely are.

For example Forza Motorsport has minimum specs (low settings), recommended specs (high settings) and ideal specs (ultra settings). Recommended specs is a Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti. But don't expect to play the game on ultra with that GPU. Because ideal specs (ultra settings) are listed with an RTX 4080.

Also often there is a setting like shadows where if just changed from ultra to high you can save a ton of fps with often very little visual difference. If the tester tried to play the game on ultra settings with an old GPU, I mean what did he expect?

[Silverlight]

Publicado originalmente por sL3nd3rMann:

Publicado originalmente por morph113:

Yes we know how upscaling works. Doesn't change the fact that OP provides very little details or even any source. LIke what were the rest of the specs? What CPU was used? What settings was the game running at? Depending on the game, ultra settings can be very demanding and you may need top hardware for it. It was clear that recommended specs were not meant for ultra settings, they rarely are.

For example Forza Motorsport has minimum specs (low settings), recommended specs (high settings) and ideal specs (ultra settings). Recommended specs is a Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti. But don't expect to play the game on ultra with that GPU. Because ideal specs (ultra settings) are listed with an RTX 4080.

Also often there is a setting like shadows where if just changed from ultra to high you can save a ton of fps with often very little visual difference. If the tester tried to play the game on ultra settings with an old GPU, I mean what did he expect?

You are correct. There isnt much information to make an informed, correct conclusion.

Also curious if it was an intel or AMD branded CPU and if that will matter in this game.

[MeGa]

Publicado originalmente por Elitepatriot:

I would say that is solid for a 6 year old card

Release date: Q3 2018

6 years eh? Learn to count loool

Also, most of people is not very tech savy here. Its a 3070 equivalent, so the "how old" thing is pointless.

We could be comparing one of most powerful supercars of 10 years ago, and even if "older" they are more powerful than 90% of cars released after. Its the same. 2080ti / 3070 is not for "games at mid settings, 1080p res and less than 60 fps".

[doomshadow612]

Publicado originalmente por MeGa:

Publicado originalmente por Elitepatriot:

I would say that is solid for a 6 year old card

Release date: Q3 2018

6 years eh? Learn to count loool

Also, most of people is not very tech savy here. Its a 3070 equivalent, so the "how old" thing is pointless.

We could be comparing one of most powerful supercars of 10 years ago, and even if "older" they are more powerful than 90% of cars released after. Its the same. 2080ti / 3070 is not for "games at mid settings, 1080p res and less than 60 fps".

You’re wasting time posting common sense. It’s a known fact that game development is all about activism rather than making well optimised games. Bugthesda optimisation has always been garbage - thus their games are stuttery mess even when the system used exceeds ‘recommended’ requirements. I didn’t really read the topics but I bet it’s full of shills writing garbage like “recommended system reqs are intended for running the game at 1080 with medium settings!” What about minimum then? 720 all low? Lmao

[GeassV]

Publicado originalmente por morph113:

Publicado originalmente por sL3nd3rMann:

It says in the initial op post. And FSR 2 enable. So its not 1440p.
It might be 1080p or even 720p depends if its quality or balanced or performance.

Yes we know how upscaling works. Doesn't change the fact that OP provides very little details or even any source. LIke what were the rest of the specs? What CPU was used? What settings was the game running at? Depending on the game, ultra settings can be very demanding and you may need top hardware for it. It was clear that recommended specs were not meant for ultra settings, they rarely are.

For example Forza Motorsport has minimum specs (low settings), recommended specs (high settings) and ideal specs (ultra settings). Recommended specs is a Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti. But don't expect to play the game on ultra with that GPU. Because ideal specs (ultra settings) are listed with an RTX 4080.

Also often there is a setting like shadows where if just changed from ultra to high you can save a ton of fps with often very little visual difference. If the tester tried to play the game on ultra settings with an old GPU, I mean what did he expect?

from leaker
cpu: 3800x
gpu: 2080ti
1440p high setting only motion blur medium
dynamic resolution: on
render resolution: around 20 maybe
fsr 2: on
film grain: full

45-60 fps most of the time and
60-70 fps in dungeons and space

[Ceciliantas]

Publicado originalmente por bulldog0890:

woo boy, thats some garbage right there

Game also heavily relies on CPU, if your CPU is trash then, yea. Try OCing both CPU and GPU. Also, stop downloading Pronz.

[Bill Gates]

Publicado originalmente por Bellen:

Publicado originalmente por Maizel:

I don't think OP claimed it was ultra settings.

If anyone wants to follow this thread, I'll post my benchmark when the games comes out

I'll make this game run silk smooth on the 2080ti at at least 60. Mostly high settings.

I dont think you will have any issue doing it. I think AMD is trying to make some sales and Bethesda/AMD is overstating the specs. it probably has worked. I have 6700 XT and am pretty confident I can run 60 FPS at 1440P on high settings

[Silverlight]

Publicado originalmente por GeassV:

from leaker
cpu: 3800x
gpu: 2080ti
1440p high setting only motion blur medium
dynamic resolution: on
render resolution: around 20 maybe
fsr 2: on
film grain: full

45-60 fps most of the time and
60-70 fps in dungeons and space

Nice. At least I have a 5800x3D. And I'll be disabling all this weird post processing effects (always do)

[morph113]

OK I think I found the source, it's a Reddit post but since it's a leak I'm not sure if I can link it here.

Apparently he played on high settings, also showing the graphic settings menu. He says he didn't fiddle around with graphic settings, just went with high settings preset. He gets 45-60 fps most of the time, 60-70fps in dungeons and in space. He says it runs smooth and no stutters.

He also says the planet boundary thing while true, is blown out of proportion and not an issue. He says it's GOTY nominee for sure and he would give it a 9.5 or 10/10 easily. He says he hasn't played Oblivion or Morrowind, but that the game is deeper than Fallout 4/Skyrim in RPG mechanics.

So I guess if you have at least recommended specs, you should be good with getting 60fps on medium settings probably. Game most likely still looks great on those settings anyway. If you got better hardware, you should probably be good hitting 60fps constantly on high or even ultra settings.