Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This will indeed be a very CPU heavy game and FG is awesome for that. But it wont be in.
Just accept it so we can naturally evolve PC gaming. This is ridiculous. You understand AMD does not deny meme marketing and has plants in every single major forum and subreddit to propagate vram issues and FSR vs DLSS?
DLSS has its own hardware ffs!
This game will run best with FSR because the game engine is built exclusively for it.
No amount of crying from the Nvidia fanbois will change that.
Forcing DLSS on Starfield would most likely produce artifacts and ghosting. It would degrade the graphical fidelity instead of enhancing it.
This is simply ignorance. FSR output is garbage when compared to both DLSS and XeSS. This is exactly why AMD use sponsorship/bribe money to exclude superior competing tech, the side by side comparisson. Now no one is saying FSR should be removed. Those with 6.5+ year old GPUs and those who made the mistake of buying AMD GPUs have to rely on the poor Quality FSR option. But those with a modern RTX GPU (2,3 or 4000 series) would choose DLSS due to vastly superior image quality. Those with a modern Intel GPU would choose XeSS again due to vastly superior image quality.
I find it incredible to see PC users challenging the use of modern PC graphics and indeed openly preferring the poor quality provided by AMD GPUs.
"Is DLSS Really "Better Than Native"? - 24 Game Comparison, DLSS 2 vs FSR 2 vs Native" - https://youtu.be/O5B_dqi_Syc
"Nvidia's DLSS 2 vs. AMD's FSR 2 in 26 Games, Which Looks Better? - The Ultimate Analysis" - https://youtu.be/1WM_w7TBbj0
"Can AMD Match Nvidia Yet? - FSR 2.2 vs DLSS 2.4 Analysis" - https://youtu.be/w85M3KxUtJk
What happens when a hardware vendor, AMD, spends their development money bribing developers rather than spending on developing the product? 8% market share and AMD’s Promised Performance-Boosting “HYPR-RX” Technology Misses Launch Schedule - https://wccftech.com/amd-promised-performance-boosting-hypr-rx-technology-misses-launch-schedule/
FSR 3? Do we really need 3rd generation garbage? Come on guys, we should demand better on PC.
The intention for many, including myself, posting negatively on AMD's exclusivity announcement is to make Bethesda/Microsoft reconsider the inclusion of modern PC tech such as DLSS and XeSS. I wish we could do the same for RT with the result being akin to CP2077's Overdrive option but that would require development time.
the wish is noble, but whats to achieve in steam game forums for that matter? or said otherwise, I doubt, microsoft/bethesda will read here and say "oh my, what a cool idea!".
Who's restricting the discussion to just Steam? As you can see from the OP that the general tech sites have picked up on this. Social media is alive and well.
PCPer, the old mans podcast, picking up the story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z74xLRhFquU
yeah, you are right - the chance is there, but slim, IMO.
I could clearly see the difference between the two in The Witcher 3. Did you have Sharpness set to High? For me, DLSS was very noticeably sharper than FSR. Both where set to Quality.
Perfect timing -
Got to keep up the pressure or else we, as PC gamers, lose out.