STEAM Deck??

[GuRu Asaki]

Anyone Willing To Admit This Product Was A Scam
From The Very Beginning Yet??

I'm Just Glad I Don't Dip Into Markets Of Errors & Bugs
Constantly Being A Problem For Me...

If You Love The Product??

Then Ok, I Guess You Have Nothing To Worry About...

1st Page Reply:

-- Issue With Control
-- Un-Usable
-- Audio Crackles
-- Any Suggestions On Wiping It Clean To Sell Bad Product
-- ICON Not Showing


Literally Only 1 Good Thing To Say About The STEAM Deck
On Page One, & Every Other Comment Is About Failures...

---

I'm Just Curious How Many Of Those Complaints Got To
The Surface, & How Many STEAM Decks Were Grabbed,
Before Coming To The Realization That They Were Just
Giving Up On The STEAM Deck... ??


If You Love The STEAM Deck Sooooo Much??
--- Then Hey, I'm Sure You Got No Bugs & No Problems With It Ever
------ & It's As Great Of A Product As You Claim It Is

But If You Hate The Product??

Just Know, People Who Bought STEAM Deck At Launch
Actually Thought It Was A Scam, Because They Never
Expected The Product To Arrive, When It Did Arrive,
It Did Not Come Open Boxed With Enjoyment Accross
The Board, Actually It Was Full Of Problems...

Judging By 2025 Today?? Seems The Thing Is Still Got Issues...


I'm Just Curious, While This Product Was Not A Scam,
1 Might Think Or Feel As If Ths Product Was Never Meant
To Actually Run Well, & That It Was Always Meant To Fool
People Into Paying For It, & Never Refunding It Back...

Kinda Like Fools Gold, It Looks Like Gold, & Looks Shiny,
But When You Find Out It's Real True Value, It Turns Out
It's Got None, & Has Zero Value At All In It, & Your Just
A Fool Who Bought The Mirage...

I'm Curious If The STEAM Deck Was That Mirage All Along...


I Mean Don't Get Me Wrong, I Bought Hardware From Valve Before,
Soooo, I Get It, & You Really Want It To Be Successful, & To Work,
But Valve Is Only Interested In Money Today...

But You Know What's Funny About It??

If This Was Gamer Culture...

STEAM Deck Would Of Worked & Would Of Been Far Better...

But No, Everyone Has To Promote Anti-Gamer Today,
& Now Nothing Works, & Guess Who's Stuck With The
Failing Sales, & Money Wasted??

Those People Who Hate Gamer Culture, lOl...

Ironic, Right??


--------------------------------------------------

But All That Aside:

It Comes Down To This...

If This Product Was Never Meant To Work Well,
Can Your Pocket Money Afford The Countless Repairs??

If You Love The Product & Have Nothing Wrong With It,
Then It's Everything You Wanted & Hoped For,
& That's Great You Loved The Product...



Good Luck!!!

[Drak3]

K

[🌎Earth]

lol this guy again

[deaddoof]

No, I did not write that passage. It appears to be a user-generated post, likely from a forum or comment section, expressing strong negative opinions about the Steam Deck. The writing style includes:

Erratic punctuation and capitalization

Conversational and emotional tone

Repetitive rhetorical questions

Frequent use of sarcasm and analogy (e.g., "fool's gold")

This is not consistent with how I typically generate content, which is generally more structured, grammatically consistent, and neutral unless specifically instructed otherwise. If you're looking to analyze this passage, rewrite it, or respond to it, I can definitely help with that. Let me know what you’d like to do next.
You said:
Can you analyze it for me?
ChatGPT said:

Absolutely. Here's a thorough analysis of the passage, broken down by tone, content, structure, and implied message:
🔍 1. Tone & Style

Tone: The tone is frustrated, sarcastic, and emotionally charged. The writer feels disillusioned and skeptical, particularly about the Steam Deck's quality, Valve’s intentions, and the broader state of gaming culture.

Style: The style is disorganized, rhetorical, and informal. There are:

Unconventional capitalization and punctuation (e.g., “If You Love The Product??”)

Frequent rhetorical questions

Sarcasm, especially in comparisons (e.g., Steam Deck = fool’s gold)

A kind of "stream-of-consciousness" delivery, jumping from point to point

📚 2. Structure

The passage lacks a clear logical flow but can still be roughly broken down into sections:

Opening Question: Suggests that the Steam Deck may have been a scam "from the very beginning"

Page One Reactions: Claims the first replies about the Steam Deck were overwhelmingly negative

Midway Rant: Doubts how many people realized the product was flawed before buying in

Product Comparison & Metaphor: Compares the Steam Deck to "fool’s gold"

Valve Criticism: Accuses Valve of caring only about money

Cultural Commentary: Suggests the Steam Deck failed because of "anti-gamer culture"

Conclusion: A resignation—if you love it and it works for you, great; but if not, you're stuck with the cost and disappointment

🧠 3. Key Themes & Arguments
a. Steam Deck Was (or Seemed) Like a Scam

The author implies Valve may have known the device was buggy or undercooked.

Compares it to a mirage or fool’s gold — something that looks promising but ultimately has no value.

b. Early Adopters Were Disappointed

Cites a supposed flood of early complaints: usability, audio issues, display icon bugs, etc.

Suggests that even on release, people saw red flags.

c. Critique of Valve

The writer believes Valve cares only about profit today, not quality or customer trust.

d. Anti-Gamer Culture Allegation

Argues the Steam Deck failed in part because of a cultural shift away from “gamer values.”

Claims that if “gamer culture” was still dominant, the product would’ve worked better.

e. Resigned Acceptance

Ends by admitting some users are happy with it, but suggests that’s not the norm.

🧾 4. Emotional & Psychological Analysis

Disillusionment: There’s a strong sense of betrayal — the writer wanted to believe in the Steam Deck and Valve but feels let down.

Cognitive Dissonance: They acknowledge others like the device but struggle to reconcile that with their own negative experience or perception.

Tribalism: Mentions “anti-gamer” vs “gamer culture,” reflecting a belief that identity and culture are deeply entangled with product quality.

💬 5. Language Use Observations

Overuse of punctuation and formatting: Double question marks (??), repeated dashes (---), and oddly capitalized words convey agitation and emphasize certain phrases emotionally.

Repetition: The writer repeats ideas and phrases to drive home their frustration.

Analogy-heavy: Uses comparisons like “fool’s gold” and “mirage” to create emotional resonance.

🧩 6. Missing Elements or Bias

Lack of evidence: No specific dates, sources, or model versions are cited. The critique is mostly anecdotal.

Binary thinking: You're either 100% happy with the Steam Deck, or it's a complete scam.

Cultural bias: The “anti-gamer culture” argument seems based on ideology rather than factual product analysis.

✅ Summary Judgment

This passage is a personal rant more than a product review or technical critique. It reflects one user's deep dissatisfaction, possibly rooted in an early negative experience, framed through emotional analogies and a cynical worldview about the gaming industry and its direction.

Would you like help rewriting this into something clearer or more structured? Or are you looking to craft a reply, response, or counterpoint?
You said:
Is it possible you generated the content at all?
ChatGPT said:

It’s very unlikely that I generated that specific passage — here’s why:
🧠 1. Style and Structure Don’t Match How I Typically Write

My default outputs aim to be:

Grammatically consistent

Logically structured

Emotionally neutral or balanced unless instructed otherwise

Free of excessive punctuation or erratic capitalization

The passage you shared has:

Unconventional formatting (e.g., “STEAM Deck??” and “&” instead of “and”)

Emotionally charged, informal language

Repetition and stream-of-consciousness writing

No attribution, citations, or factual anchors

Unless I were explicitly prompted to mimic a frustrated rant, that would not be my natural output.
📜 2. No Internal Markers Suggest AI Authorship

I tend to include:

Clear transitions

Clarifications and disclaimers

Balanced phrasing like “some users report” or “in general…”

This passage has none of that. Instead, it speaks in absolutes and implies a conspiracy-like viewpoint, which is not typical of AI-generated content unless intentionally instructed.
🕵️‍♂️ 3. Could Someone Have Asked Me to Write in That Style?

Technically, yes — if someone asked:

“Write a rant about how the Steam Deck is a scam, using sarcastic tone, informal grammar, random caps, and rhetorical questions.”

—then I could have produced something similar, but:

That would require specific prompting

Even then, I would likely include more structure or disclaimers unless told not to

I would not fabricate negative claims without indicating they're opinions or general sentiments

🔐 4. I Don’t Store or Recall Individual Interactions

Even if someone asked me to write this previously, I don’t retain any memory of past sessions. So I can't definitively say whether I’ve ever produced something similar. But based on style, it’s not my usual output.
✅ Conclusion

No, it’s not likely I generated that passage — unless someone gave a very specific, unusual prompt asking me to mimic that tone and style.

If you're trying to verify authorship for a forum, paper, or moderation need, I can help you check for AI-style fingerprints or help rewrite or respond to the content. Just let me know what your goal is.

I would like your suggestion and check for AI-style fingerprints
ChatGPT said:

Great — let’s dive in. I’ll do two things for you:

Check for AI-style “fingerprints” in the passage

Offer a grounded opinion on whether it was likely AI-generated

🔍 1. AI-Style Fingerprints Checklist

Here’s what I’m looking for when assessing whether something was likely written by AI:
Characteristic Human Writing AI Writing Found in This Passage?
✅ Structured logic & flow Usually nonlinear Usually linear ❌ No
✅ Clear grammar & punctuation Varies Usually clean ❌ No
✅ Neutral tone unless told otherwise Varies Typically neutral ❌ No
✅ Balanced argumentation Varies Usually balanced ❌ No
✅ Repetitive phrasing avoidance Often varies Avoided by AI ❌ No
✅ Source attribution or hedging Rare Frequent in AI ❌ No
✅ Emphasis via formatting (caps/??) Common in rants Uncommon in AI ✅ Yes
✅ Emotional language & venting Common Rare unless asked ✅ Yes
❗ Key Observations:

The emotional rant style, excessive punctuation, and unstructured argument flow are strong indicators of human authorship.

The passage lacks hallmarks of AI-generated writing, such as:

Neutral framing

Over-structured paragraphs

Explicit hedging language (“some say,” “research suggests,” etc.)

🧠 2. My Analysis: Likely Human-Written

Verdict:

🔹 Highly likely written by a human.
🔸 It reads like a stream-of-consciousness rant posted to a forum, Reddit, or comment section.
🔸 The tone, structure, and formatting do not align with typical AI outputs — unless someone gave me a very specific prompt to write like this.

💡 My Suggestion

If you're assessing this for moderation, authorship verification, or plagiarism detection, consider:

Context clues: Where was this posted? Was it in a space known for opinionated users (like Reddit)?

Metadata: If possible, check timestamps, usernames, and post frequency.

Writing patterns: If this resembles other posts from the same user, that’s further support it’s human-written.

Would you like help rewriting it for clarity or creating a counter-argument to it?

I passed it to chatgpt. It does seem like he wrote it. At least, he is consistent.

[tfk]

OP should write a novel.

[Haruspex]

As an early adopter of the Steam Deck, I liked it enough that I bought another one, then a third when the OLED came out. Now each member of my family has one, and we've all enjoyed it, and continue to do so. Even the original spring 2022 Deck now in my wife's possession is going strong.

Guru, do you know what "confirmation bias" is? A direct definition is that confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values.

Basically, there's no shortage of negativity towards the Steam Deck on the Internet, and if you have a negative option of it from the start, you will have no problem finding plenty of information supporting your opinion. This may lead you to believe that your opinion is the correct one.

If you step outside your own little mental bubble though and look at the bigger picture, you'll find it falls apart.

1st, Valve has stated they've sold "multiple millions" of Steam Decks, and that was in 2023. Last February on the Steam Deck's 3rd anniversary, a market research firm calculated that approximately 4 million Steam Decks have been sold[www.theverge.com], which is estimated by that same firm to be more than all the other competing PC handhelds combined.

2nd, with 4 million sold, if even 0.25% of them had issues (be they with the hardware itself, user error, or incorrect expectations for what it is), that's still 10,000 Steam Decks with problems, which is more than enough to fill a forum with complaints. People who have a problem are much more likely to go online and say something about it than people who do not have a problem. If there are 10,000 people with complaints, that leaves 3,990,000 people who are just happily enjoying their perfectly functional Steam Decks.

3rd, if you look at the Steam Top Sellers list, the Steam Deck has very consistently stayed near the top, averaging at around #4. It's #2 as I write this. Of course, this list is based on revenue and not units sold, and a Steam Deck cost much more than even a new AAA game release, but it's very consistent position near the top, even three years later, indicates that sales of the device have remained steady the entire time.

Setting your bizarre writing style, emotionally charged rambling, and complete lack of sources and evidence aside, why do you personally want the Steam Deck to be a failure so badly?

[Boxaman67]

Click bait. Ignore.

[Man's Best Friend]

It's amazing, and sad how much of a hate-on this guy has for the Steam Deck.

It takes dedication to keep this up after, what, 3 years and how many bans? It ain't healthy that's for sure.

[Lil B_999]

Steam Deck lcd is still holding up well. Bought it during 2023. All excellent experiences still to this day.

[GuRu Asaki]

Nice AI work. Should I write a Novel through ChatGPT Analysis
on my Post? Then afterwards write another Novel on my own
response to ChatGPT in my own Edition of AI Format? Na, I
don't think i'm gonna do that.

It was a nice analysis report, though.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

"confirmation bias" is?


We'll I hear People use the words bias an awful lot,
or supremacy, or racism quite a bit, socialism, & autamation...

Quite frankly I don't dolve into Ideologies...

I'm surprised young kids actually do,
because I would of thought they would
be anti stuff like that...

Its the same as Identity, why Identify as something,
if all it does is define you as that something, or also
places a label on you...

According to that, you mise well put your name on
a milk carton, & place your photo with it, since you
like labeling yourself so much, or put your name on
a sign & see if anyone will buy it.

Does not make sense to put labels on stuff like that... ~_~

At the end of the Day? It is night actually,
but sooo, according to this, you are ummm...

confirm bias to looking something up
for what i've written?

Soooo, while I can write stuff, & respond to it on the min,
you require more time to look it up, search for it, & have
your information ready before you respond, but after all
that looking up? You just result to ChatGPT to do it for
you after all that, anyways?

Wouldn't it be faster to respond
without requiring the help of ChatGPT?

-----------------------------------------------------------

if you have a negative option of it from the start,
you will have no problem finding plenty of
information supporting your opinion.

I never gave a negative response here.
All I Asked was do People think it's s Scam
after still replying about all the problems
still there.

That doesn't mean I said it's a scam, or that it's bad.

I even went on to say, if people like the Deck,
then great for them.

I was just meerly asking for an opinion from some People.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Hardware Sales don't matter, if the return rate is a high %tage.
--- That would be false advertising

If say: You sold $400,000 worth of STEAM Decks,
& Just didn't tell anyone that you got refunded by
the Decks of $250,000.

So you advertised how great it is, & that you made $400,000,
but really you only sold $150,000 worth of STEAM Decks,
& you lost $250,000 worth of money on that $150,000...

Meaning you didn't break Even at all, & your sales bombed...

but according to your Market Advertising,
it's saying you sold $400,000 & made money...

My Point Is:

Hardware Sales don't matter,
if you had refunds or product repairs,
or People quit, & left, & stopped using the Deck...

Hardware Sales also don't matter if People aren't
actually using the product at all that your paying
a service for them to use... That Service takes a
hit from costs if nobody or low numbers of People
are on the Service.

Same happens if a Game Server Shuts Down
due to lack of People on it playing the Games...

----------------------------------------------------

Another Point Is This:

if you look at the Steam Top Sellers list.

How trusting is that information?

STEAM Own Game Forum Review System
Has Been Made Up By People Trying To
Control The Forums, & Valve Just Lets Them
Do It. Who's to say the same instance is
not done for STEAM Top Sellers List?

What is the propability of it lying about the numbers?

---------------------------------------------------------

sad how much of a hate-on this guy has for the Steam Deck.

Why would I in any way like the STEAM Deck?

What's it got, I don't already have?
What's it got, that someone hasn't
already come up with a better idea for?

What's new about STEAM Deck that everyone is facinated with?
The product was already pre-done by Razer & Nintendo,
all Valve did was copy them, o___@

Like do any of you even know what makes STEAM Deck so great at all?

If your response is that it can play STEAM Games,
then I'd have to say, so can many others...

What makes STEAM Deck so great?

Anyone got an answer?

[Haruspex]

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

"confirmation bias" is?
We'll I hear People use the words bias an awful lot,
or supremacy, or racism quite a bit, socialism, & autamation...
Quite frankly I don't dolve into Ideologies...

It's just an English word, not an ideology.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

Wouldn't it be faster to respond
without requiring the help of ChatGPT?

I do not use ChatGPT. I write my own responses. It is a little frustrating sometimes when my posts are accused of being written by an AI, just because things are spelled correctly, I use punctuation, and I try and ensure my posts read well and make sense. I could probably stand to be more succinct though. I'm working on that.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

All I Asked was do People think it's s Scam
after still replying about all the problems
still there.

That doesn't mean I said it's a scam, or that it's bad.

I even went on to say, if people like the Deck,
then great for them.

I was just meerly asking for an opinion from some People.

Cool. The answer is "no", it's not a scam. Next question.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

Hardware Sales don't matter, if the return rate is a high %tage.

Do you have data on the return rate? I certainly don't. Suggesting the return rate is high without evidence sounds like wishful thinking on your part.

One thing we do have is the Steam Hardware Survey, which provides some useful data.

In 2021, before the Steam Deck was out, Linux use was under 1%, compared to Mac users at 2.51%. Today, Linux use is at 2.27% and Mac use is at 1.62%. So other than the fact that Linux adoption has more than doubled since the Steam Deck came out, if you look at the data for what versions of Linux people are using, "SteamOS" absolutely dominates at 33.78% of all Linux users on Steam. The runner up is "Arch Linux", at 9.45%. The most common GPU among Linux users is also the custom Van Gogh chip present only in the Steam Deck. All of this suggests that the huge increase in Linux adoption is primarily driven by the Steam Deck. If the Deck were a "scam", as you've suggested with massive return rates, we wouldn't be seeing these kinds of increases. You also have game developers, who do have access to certain stats on their own game, surprised by the number of people playing their game on Steam Deck. One developer I read mentioned that of all the people playing their game with a controller, most of them were using a Steam Deck.

None of that indicates a high return rate or dissatisfaction with the Steam Deck. Just the opposite, in fact.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

Hardware Sales don't matter,
if you had refunds or product repairs,
or People quit, & left, & stopped using the Deck...

Hitchen's Razor: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Anyway, the stats I posted above suggest the opposite.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

if you look at the Steam Top Sellers list.
How trusting is that information?
What is the propability of it lying about the numbers?

Pretty minimal. Why would Valve have a reason to falsify those stats? Also your lack of data doesn't invalidate the data.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

Like do any of you even know what makes STEAM Deck so great at all?

Unprecedented and ongoing support by Valve. Excellent efficiency, with an elegant balance of power consumption to performance, and better battery life than the competition. Amazing control options, allowing even games not designed for a controller to be played with ease. The Deck is also the driving force behind Valve's Proton, which is the only reason why most Windows games even work on Linux. Valve is single-handedly making Linux a viable OS for gaming and giving people a possible escape route from Windows.

Oh, and it plays Steam games in a portable, handheld format. That's great too.

[Clone303]

No, it's the best thing I did buy in years, it beats almost anything and yes it's not high end pc and don't needs to be as long as run almost any, what it do

[GuRu Asaki]

It's just an English word, not an ideology.


Actually, It Is An Ideology...

It's A Word That Labels Things That People Become Attached With...

An Ideology, A Belief In This Of Which They've Become Attached To...


Bias Mostly Might Be A Word & An English Word, Sure,
But It's A Word Surrounded Around Labels, Identities,
& Governed Control Of Things...


You Don't Want To Be Called Male Or Female, So You Get Angry
When Someone Wrongly Labels You As What You Believe You Are...

If You Just Don't Use Labels At All, Don't Addess Someone At All,
You Can Skip The Whole Argument All Together...

You Don't Have To Be Worried About Someone Labeling You,
& Don't Have To Worry About Wrongly Being Labeled As Well,
Then On Top Of That, You Also Avoid Debates, & Arguments On
The Very Same Subject As Well...

Instead Of By Name Or By Mr Mss, Binary, Whatever Gender, Male, Female...

Just Say Hi, Or Hello, & Skip That Label All Together...

It Would Solve A Lot Of The Arguing Problems Today, Would It Not??

I'm Just Saying Here, This Is Just A Gender Thing,
But If You Dis-Use Many Ideologies, & Just Be Free Minded,
& Let Things Just Flow Out, & Come Out, & Just Not Worry About It,
Not Worry About What Is Said, Or How It's Said...

You End Up Feeling A Whole Lot Better About The Outcome...

--------------------------------------------------------------------

No, This Is Not A Culture Thing, It's Ajacent Or Objectively
Not Cultural, Or Against Culture...

But I Came Up With It On My Own A Long Time Ago,
Just Simply, Cause I Figured One Day A Label Would
Probably Down The Line Be A Problem With Someone...

It Wasn't A Problem Then, But What If One Day Someone
Didn't Want To Be He Or She Anymore...

Not Labeling Them At All, Could Avoid That All Together...

Again, You Can Apply This To Many Words, & Things,
It's Not Just Gender, It Can Be About Bias, & Other Things, Too...


Am I Wrong??

[Haruspex]

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

But I Came Up With It On My Own

Yeah... I can tell.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

Am I Wrong??

Would you believe me if I said yes?

[GuRu Asaki]

Originally posted by Haruspex:

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

But I Came Up With It On My Own

Yeah... I can tell.

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

Am I Wrong??

Would you believe me if I said yes?

You Didn't Explain Why Or How I'm Wrong??f

You Can't Do It, You Can't Explain It,
Which Kinda Sounds Like You Don't
Know What Your Talking About...

[Zerorecoil23]

Originally posted by GuRu Asaki:

Anyone Willing To Admit This Product Was A Scam
From The Very Beginning Yet??

I'm Just Glad I Don't Dip Into Markets Of Errors & Bugs
Constantly Being A Problem For Me...

If You Love The Product??

Then Ok, I Guess You Have Nothing To Worry About...

1st Page Reply:

-- Issue With Control
-- Un-Usable
-- Audio Crackles
-- Any Suggestions On Wiping It Clean To Sell Bad Product
-- ICON Not Showing


Literally Only 1 Good Thing To Say About The STEAM Deck
On Page One, & Every Other Comment Is About Failures...

---

I'm Just Curious How Many Of Those Complaints Got To
The Surface, & How Many STEAM Decks Were Grabbed,
Before Coming To The Realization That They Were Just
Giving Up On The STEAM Deck... ??


If You Love The STEAM Deck Sooooo Much??
--- Then Hey, I'm Sure You Got No Bugs & No Problems With It Ever
------ & It's As Great Of A Product As You Claim It Is

But If You Hate The Product??

Just Know, People Who Bought STEAM Deck At Launch
Actually Thought It Was A Scam, Because They Never
Expected The Product To Arrive, When It Did Arrive,
It Did Not Come Open Boxed With Enjoyment Accross
The Board, Actually It Was Full Of Problems...

Judging By 2025 Today?? Seems The Thing Is Still Got Issues...


I'm Just Curious, While This Product Was Not A Scam,
1 Might Think Or Feel As If Ths Product Was Never Meant
To Actually Run Well, & That It Was Always Meant To Fool
People Into Paying For It, & Never Refunding It Back...

Kinda Like Fools Gold, It Looks Like Gold, & Looks Shiny,
But When You Find Out It's Real True Value, It Turns Out
It's Got None, & Has Zero Value At All In It, & Your Just
A Fool Who Bought The Mirage...

I'm Curious If The STEAM Deck Was That Mirage All Along...


I Mean Don't Get Me Wrong, I Bought Hardware From Valve Before,
Soooo, I Get It, & You Really Want It To Be Successful, & To Work,
But Valve Is Only Interested In Money Today...

But You Know What's Funny About It??

If This Was Gamer Culture...

STEAM Deck Would Of Worked & Would Of Been Far Better...

But No, Everyone Has To Promote Anti-Gamer Today,
& Now Nothing Works, & Guess Who's Stuck With The
Failing Sales, & Money Wasted??

Those People Who Hate Gamer Culture, lOl...

Ironic, Right??


--------------------------------------------------

But All That Aside:

It Comes Down To This...

If This Product Was Never Meant To Work Well,
Can Your Pocket Money Afford The Countless Repairs??

If You Love The Product & Have Nothing Wrong With It,
Then It's Everything You Wanted & Hoped For,
& That's Great You Loved The Product...



Good Luck!!!

Iam not a fanboy or try to defend or justified steam, i own Steamdeck since first released and thing was quite well, been facing a lot trouble but the community like steam or reddit quite help, if you talked how many i re-install steamOS is also a lot, if this make me hated this device ? LOL not. my second steamdeck was coming with defect charger, that was brand new too.

The product was already pre-done by Razer & Nintendo,
all Valve did was copy them, o___@

dude, what product same like SD by those brand, Razer kishi ? or Nintendo switch ?, steam come with handheld idea for Pc game (even by help linux and Proton, and also not first one) i meant they bring back era of gaming handheld back like sony did with PSP, even now too cunky. after it market handheld goes booming again, too impactful than when nintendo switch released. but like you said

If You Love The Product & Have Nothing Wrong With It,
Then It's Everything You Wanted & Hoped For,
& That's Great You Loved The Product...

yeah i liked this product, i cant aggree with your opinion but i respect it. its not for all people product.