安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
"cool story bro moment" of the thread, lol.
maybe you misread the question, or assumed erroneously is not about politics or how economics related to that. for this topic, in this context, and relative to the words used by op (ie "trade war" and the concept of "rich = always evil"), is absurd to expect non-political and non-economy answers.
if you believe is possible to make an objective criticism or comment about what op asked, in such a way you cannot mention politics or economy, please share your example.
this is what the topic is actually about, and entertainment. is not actually about the tariffs, since he failed to mention things like brands, components, concrete stuff, and in a more objective fashion (ie, again, the "rich = auto-evil").
Errr... Tariff arrive to Steam because the majority of the internet became escapism. At a certain point, escapism becomes counterproductive and you will ironically experience it at the escapism.
Even if R+5 comments doesn't understand the realities of the world, you are still affected by the guy mis read of the current situation.
Ummmm.... Define positive. Defined negative..... Trade agreements are multi generational battles. It is easier to break them to create them. Since you probably do not have a understanding with fiat currency either, I would hold off on the globalization word.
While my line of work is in a different field, my graduate degree work was in economics. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
There are no winners in a trade war, just survivors. Until the US can magically produce all of the necessary raw commodities it needs for a non-existent manufacturing base (that will take decades to build, to say nothing of the massive labor retraining and skill-building to operate these new industries), prices will rise while the decreasing demand abroad will have an outsized negative effect on the economy (the Keynesian multiplier for exogenous demand is a huge boon for the US economy). Only fools are willing to gamble their futures for the concept of a plan with no end in sight.
My question was on whether Valve had intimated any potential price/availability changes in the short-term to the Steam Deck. If you happen to have actual information, please let me know.