Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Valve doesn't want to release full sales numbers. Having reviews can help track sales and when purchases were made. Valve only tells the public when they feel a number threshold has been met but no specifics other than that.
No way to completely verify who owns a Deck.
Besides that, my deck is perfect.
Just look up "Steam deck bricked no RMA" and "Steam Deck bricking SD cards" and you'll realize that if it could be reviewed it would probably be rated worse than Cities: Skylines II. And Valve doesn't want that.
Valve made the decision long before the Deck was even made or sold. For example, check the Valve Index VR:
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1059530/reviews/
which was released before the Deck. So your narrative doesn't match the timeline.
Agreed.
1. People looking to buy the product will first look on the products page for reviews not sift through pages and pages of a forum they wouldn’t even know existed possibly.
2. Any time a company censors they try to do things to off set that they are censoring / silencing by allowing some info on this forum it allows them to
Use the “see we aren’t censoring” line, even tho they know the majority of buyers would look on the product page for reviews and most people looking into it won’t bother with forums.
Politicians and governments do this kind of mind games all the time.