Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Its uses the SAME APU (new process, no changes in terms of power draw and performance) as the old one. The only thing that they improved is the RAM.
You can get a LOT more performance with an OLED display for the same money from other manufacturers.
This is certainly a device for hardcore Steam Deck Fan(boys).
Do not spread misinformation. You are so wrong on many points:
https://youtu.be/Z1KLj06fn2s
The APU on the OLED model is now 6nm instead of 7nm, which means it's more efficient. This, coupled with a 25% larger battery means considerable more battery life plus less fan noise and lower heat production.
You're at least right in that other devices like the ROG Ally and Lenovo Legion technically offer more performance when pushed, however they achieve this increase performance in a kind of brute-forced way by just throwing more wattage at the problem. Yes, you can get more FPS, but your battery life is going to be something like 40 minutes worst case scenario. Maybe 50 minutes to an hour thanks to the Legion's slightly bigger battery.
Valve could have gone the brute-force route, but they understand that this is a portable device, and they very intentionally and carefully balance performance, with battery life, focusing on efficiency. This shows when running the Deck at lower wattages, where the Deck actually performs better at lower TDP than the Z1 extreme powered devices.
What else, full HDR 2.0 support, bigger display, more responsive touchscreen, better haptics, improved thumb sticks and bumper buttons, improved audio (The Deck already had best in class audio, and they've made it even better.), Wi-Fi 6E support, and wake on Bluetooth.
Mark my words, we will see an even higher performance Steam deck in the future, but Valve isn't going to rush some rushed engineering, brute-forced system out the door like the competition does. Only when they can get a significant enough performance bump while still keeping things cool and efficient will we see a Steam Deck 2.0.
I guess the resolution and 7-8 inches (too small) are the only things I can critique, but to me its an optimal choice, if I go with one.
Perhaps I will wait for an other day, to see what they and the competition come up with for the second round in a few years, but to me it is clearly superior on this day. Also I do not think the price is unreasonable, you get a working computer with display that does what it is supposed to, plays my games when travelling.
Thanks for reading:)
I was thinking about it. Would they try again with oled deck?
Either way, deck2 is pretty predictable relative release date. Watch when Apple will release a lpddr6 device. Valve will release deck 2 with a few month of it.