安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
This won't help. Just wait for the next gen version that will have a much faster APU (most likely AMD 7000 series), and these will definitely come with more RAM.
I play video games. In this case, hogwarts legacy, and at lowest with FSR on performance, i cap out pretty much all the memory. and in desktop mode, i have a system freeze pretty muc daily because surprise, 16GB ram also means shared as video memory. I have 64GB ram, and with my power usages, i can easily use up these 16GB.
The default SWAP size is way too low which is 1 GB. I would recommend make a 8-16 GB swap partition.
That looks like a possible point of failure for the storage on the Steam Deck. I recently saw a post suggesting that the Deck may put too high a priority on swap, which might increase writes on that 1GB partition. I wonder how the drive will react with that 1GB partition is worn out from too many writes.
If you read the replies, I commented the OP doesn't understand OS topics like swap...
Desktop workloads are random and there are known freezing issues whenever swap is too low. Ubuntu got bit with 1 GB swap default. There were plenty of people who experience the OOM killer.
Btw, SSD can tolerate a ton of write. Writing swap when needed is not why SSD fails.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1675200/discussions/1/3387291961144501191/
That's annoyingly slow. And swap is nvme "emergency ram" to not go to a system halt because no more physical ram. And also, using swap is a sure nvme killer as nvme's can only write so much.
A move to more RAM is the better way forward, especially as demand for more RAM is outpacing the demand for more CPU or GPU power.
Yep. I plan on doing the same ram upgrade as a guy in ohio who upgrades deck's with ram and wifi. And i plan to upgrade mine not only to 32GB ram, but go from 5700mhz was it, to 6400mhz, so faster ram too. And that not only helps in games to properly allocate all it needs, but also as i'm a poweruser in desktop mode. when i used deck as main pc when my main rig was down for a month, i had to hard reset deck several times daily as i kept forgetting i onkly had less than 16GB ram (less than because whenever i did anything that used HW accel, it uses ram as video memory, meaning less for programs). So 32GB would be a huge boost in more than one way.
https://www.slickbuysmodsandrepairs.com/
Same.
SWAP is a great solution for gaming.... Games are in memory databases. Swap ensure you have full dynamic use of your 16 GB and give your memory manager something else to play with. SWAP is does not replace RAM and vice versa...... I repeat. SWAP is not about replacing RAM. SWAP is not RAM of last resort. When it becomes RAM of last resort, yes you should be increasing RAM. However, Steam Deck ships with a joke amount of 1 GB SWAP. Every OS implementor will always say they implemented swap to reclaim anonymous pages and reduce in memory fragmentation. The whole point of swap is to allow the memory allocator to be more efficient.
All OS implementors run swap in non critical situations. SWAP is not emergency ram. All OS implementors do not treat swap as emergency ram. This myth has to die.
In fact, using swap during emergencies is a bad idea. Makes the whole system worse
Swap is added for other memory allocator benefits. It doesn't have to be as fast as RAM for swap to guarantee full memory throughput. Of course, it should be faster than SD cards.
.....
Almost every test has shown SSD have pretty good durability overall. You must buy pretty awful nvme if they can be killed with Swapping. I digress only awful OS can excessively swap.