Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Late game, most likely so.
AI is notoriously stupid when it comes to late game battle calculations. I've managed to score a couple victories on what the computer told me were "impossible" battles.
The AI is not capable of 'clever' setups. It works best with basic, straight forward armies.
That's why it needs a numbers advantage against the human player.
If you keep that in mind, and keep adding fodder then you should win if you chose your battles well.
For example, spiders can be really tough to beat on auto. At least in my experience.
the AI doesn't do so well when you make builds that require a bit more hands on control, so factions like Dark or Reavers can have a lot of difficulty if you have to rely on auto-battles more often, like in multiplayer matches.
Sometimes the AI in autoresolve even won when I thought "lol I lose 100%", a scout vs 1 unit, should always lose but it used spells to win (so a win from 20 power vs 200)
Or when there is a 3v3 clash, the AI did better than I did at times (most of the times it is worse tho), sure the autoresolve took like 1 minutes to get done but it was still better
Early on the auto resolve can be quite bad as more often than not it gets one or two units killed or the entire army heavily damaged (meaning you gotta recover in your territory for 2-3 turns) which can slow down the clearing speed of neutral armies, on top of that you wont be able to put down a city pretty early when you gotta recover that often
However, you should fight most your battles manually unless you do not care about the autoresolve result
Like, only autoresolve when you feel like it should be fine to do (for example, an army of an enemy ruler is at your throne city, autoresolving that away should be fine if no other army is anywhere near). In solo you can ALWAYS do manual combat after if you didnt like the autoresolve resolution (in multiplayer it depends on how the realm is set up and how much turn time you got)
You should play a single player game, click autobattle first on every battle, and then redo the battle yourself every time. This way you can find out how well you do in general compared to the AI, and you can get a feeling whether it helps or hinders you to use autobattle. You may even get a feeling for which situations you can leave to the AI and which you should handle yourself.
I forgot you can watch the replay. I sure would like to know how thats possible, because the AI in auto usually just runs up to the enemy smacks them in the face. Its not worried about taking damage or casulties, its just taking whatever action is available to it that reduces the enemies hp.
I'd assume that, if your army is mostly melee units with maybe 1 healer, then auto resolve would go quite well, as i think that fits nicely into what the AI wants to do. But if for example your stack is full of archers, that probably wont do well. The AI will run away, taking opportunity attacks, and get as far away as it can, and then miss every shot because of range.
Maybe im wrong of course, but i'd say your odds increase when your stack is something that plays into the strat the auto-AI uses. because its not going to know what strategy you had in mind. (and i would absolutely love a dragon age style AI system where we can set priorities for the AI to focus on, though I mainly want this so I can turn some of my stacks in a siege into AI instead of having to control 18 characters + 6 summons.)
however that's assuming you are using a decent "build" with enchantments/transformations that boost relevant units. if you research a bunch of racial transformations, but don't use a lot of racial units, you probably won't do well. if you use a lot of support units, try and get good support enchantments. if you're main armies are built at cities instead of summoned, get draft boosting tomes etc. etc.
also i find the AI is still pretty bad at dealing with combat summons. combat summon heavy setups/armies/spells usually do very well against them. (spider matriarchs, the T3 summoner unit from mystic culture, ritualist hero class, totem of the wild are all prime examples)