Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The whole statement from Nintendo was to stop messaging them about Palworld.
It's not the game they said they where looking into is Pokezoo.
They're investigating how they can make their next Pokemon game as successful as Palworld.
The funny part is that statement was directed at Pokezoo we know now, so they don't even care to acknowledge their fanboys rage over Palworld
Improve performance and have better bug QA then who knows what they can do the game is set is stone it's like a James Bond film.
Funny if true, few of my friends played every game and tried Palworld saying how it's what they wanted for a while. How many raging Poke fans are there vs ones that are enjoying the game for now?
If Nintendo were smart here's what they would do:
- Copy Palworld's design top to bottom, in its entirety, with Pokemon, with better production value. Palworld devs wouldn't be able to do ♥♥♥♥ about it. Palworld fans would be happy. Pokemon fans would be happy. Nintendo would make a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of money.
Somehow though, I doubt they'll be smart enough for this move.
Yeah funny how you think that when Nintendo revealed who they are going after.
Facts are facts bud, It was Pokezoo not Palworld.
Dragon quest should sue for copying designs for the original pokemon