Palworld is selling us free assets.

[Ave]

delete/lock this, this community is too toxic to have a discussion with.

[Ave]

Originally posted by alation13:

Originally posted by Ave:

i made it myself.

It looks like a pokemon to me, better pay some royalties to Nintendo.

thats not how it works but ok.

its called fan art.

[alation13]

Originally posted by Ave:

Originally posted by alation13:

It looks like a pokemon to me, better pay some royalties to Nintendo.

thats not how it works but ok.

its called fan art.

I could have sworn it was called Copyright Infringement.

[Ave]

Originally posted by alation13:

Originally posted by Ave:

thats not how it works but ok.

its called fan art.

I could have sworn it was called Copyright Infringement.

nope, but nice trolling attempt.

[ThexRedxJester]

Yeah Free assets? bet, Know what's not free? Creating the game and coding it. Programming it to behave according to how you imagined. What are we paying for? oh yeah, the developers time and focus on creating such a project, regardless if the assets were free or not. They put it together and gave you a great game. Why are you so salty on that? Like to see you do better man, C'mon, I dare you. do better, otherwise, stfu.

[Sparrowlicious]

Originally posted by alation13:

Originally posted by Ave:

thats not how it works but ok.

its called fan art.

I could have sworn it was called Copyright Infringement.

Unlike Japan, transformative work aka fanart is actually protected in a lot of countries, like the US.

Plus, there have been people who got hired for comic and tv projects due to their fanart. So shove those comments about fanarts, you lil troll

[....]

Originally posted by Ward:

It's funny tho, as soon some game releases, its up to youtube how the influencer announce it. For other games this is bad and people go all crazy for outsourcing, for palworld people are highly defensive about it, which is a game that is 90% an asset flip, probably the most successful ever.

People are monkes and always will be

What are you even talking about?

Honestly why would anyone care if a game buys or uses a free asset instead of making it themselves leading to faster development and a bigger game and more content as long as main elements that matter are handcrafted?

Also - people like you seem to have no clue - did you never realize in many games and movies that especially generic things like sounds are reused in hundreds of games and movies?

To be honest i think this should be expanded - i would prefer a good walking animation used in every game instead of having many games with many bad walking animations etc.

I would even argue that beeing able to use certain gameplay mechanics in other games more would improve games a lot. There is no point in constantly reinventing the wheel. For example the climbing mechanic from Zelda - i think it extremely immersive and superrior to most other games ive seen. Same applys to other mechanics from other games, for example inventory management (skyrim would have been 200% better if it used a normal established inventory system) etc.

[Tim Timsen]

Originally posted by Ave:

delete/lock this, this community is too toxic to have a discussion with.

"Nobody agrees with me, everyone is toxic!"

[WereChicken]

JFC this isn't an asset flip. Yes they're using stock assets, however the implementation is all that counts and this is a bunch of fairly generic gameplay elements combined in a way that's genuinely fun to play and feels pretty fresh.

At this point it feels like a bunch of wannabe game devs crying that this is getting attention while the plebs ignore their masterwork walking simulator discussing why conservatives are evil or some corporate sell outs whose main claim to fame is a low level role on monetized cash grab of formerly good IP 7

Yes, the game needs a fair amount of polish and more end game and some pvp, however that's going to come as the game nears full release.

The criticisms of this game feel like the whinning from the same people when elden ring and hogwarts legacy came out.

[Monarchco]

Originally posted by Ave:

delete/lock this, this community is too toxic to have a discussion with.

I don't care if the asset is a purple box because its bugged.
If the game is fun, the game is fun. That's all that matters at a point.

[alation13]

Originally posted by Monarchco:

Originally posted by Ave:

delete/lock this, this community is too toxic to have a discussion with.

I don't care if the asset is a purple box because its bugged.
If the game is fun, the game is fun. That's all that matters at a point.

But is there a tick in the purple box.
You know modern gaming is all about ticking boxes.

[Caduryn]

Originally posted by Ave:

delete/lock this, this community is too toxic to have a discussion with.

Yes, this is what happens when YOU make trolling and lying Topic

[[Blood Raven] Cyrus]

crazy how when you ask for evidence they have none to give and most evidence they do provide is fake because people who make fake evidence mad at animal abuse or some dump reason

[tonbalıg]

People want only one thing from a game and thats having fun. We dont care about rest :)

[Aquascape420]

op changed the original post cuz they got sick of their own troll. love it

[Izeyash]

Well then, let's preserve what ave has said, shall we?

Original post read the following:

Originally posted by Ave:

https://imgur.com/a/IiwE8OD

i think most people that have developed something in unreal engine know this riffle... its from:
https://www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/en-US/product/military-weapons-silver

i mean... i understand if they use bought assets but you can't sell us free ones....

In this thread, I find myself reflecting deeply on the discourse unfolding. Ave, I must inquire: do all these individuals now represent my alternate accounts as well? I ask simply due to your prior assertions during our exchanges in another forum.

The harsh reality of the matter is that the original poster lacks professional experience in this domain, nor does he possess the qualifications to engage in such discussions. While it is not always necessary to be a chef to critique cuisine or a film producer to analyze cinematic flaws, it is pertinent to note that the issue of "free assets" is of minimal consequence in this context.

I recall similar instances where misconceptions arose regarding benchmarks and the real-world performance of computer hardware. Despite requests for evidence, you were unable to substantiate your claims, suggesting that information was readily accessible via a simple online search. When presented with contrary evidence and criticism, your response has remained consistent, characterizing dissenters as trolls and maintaining your stance as correct.

I trust that you have gleaned valuable insights from these interactions.