Palworld

Palworld

Ver estadísticas:
Este tema ha sido cerrado
THIS GAME ⁧⁧SUCKS 26 ENE 2024 a las 7:53 a. m.
50
10
4
7
[PETITION]Please Remove Lovander
Lovander's design is inappropriate and sets a bad example for gamers. Lovander's lore doesn't make sense. Lovander needs to be removed from the game! Anyone else agree?
< >
Mostrando 316-330 de 665 comentarios
GroovyHobo 7 FEB 2024 a las 8:44 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por MewTressym:
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:
Exactly how am I pushing for some sort of social justice DEI equality/equity? Becuase that's what a SJW is.

Dear hypocrite: You cannot push for societal moral justice without being a social justice warrior.

DEI is just the SJW Moderns version of what your type started.

They are fundamentally exactly the same.

The only difference is who each of you want in power at the end of your persecution rampage. Which ironically is the same exact oligarchs you both unwittingly serve.

Moral justice can simply be called justice. Justice is moral by its very nature so it's redundant to call it that.



Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:

You are taking my intent behind my words completely wrong. "Wouldn't work with the modern audiences" was simply my way of saying, "people today would cancel it" and not that modern audiences are somehow superior.

Turned into:

Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:

I absolutely do get that quip since it is indeed you who is starting to catch up. I'll quote the comment you misunderstood and then highlight how slow you are.



Back at you.

Go look at your replies prior to those.
Kindred Spirit 7 FEB 2024 a las 8:50 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:
Go look at your replies prior to those.

Again, I know you weren't speaking about "modern audiences" in a positive manner. This is obvious if you had actually read the post your first reply was confused about, which I helpfully provided with your reply, and then you'd understand that I was merely continuing the pejorative use.

Any confusion here has always been on your part. :cute:

My reply to Sagebrush:

Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:
Publicado originalmente por Sagebrush:
"Modern audience" is indeed a forced meme that everyone with a functioning brain is sick of. The thing is more and more of internet-based communications are fake and filtered, producing a manufactured false consensus that doesn't actually reflect reality. It's true many are just consensus-seekers and virtue signallers, but the market is currently speaking.

What is truly funny is how that "modern audience" is trying to become more like Christian fundamentalist authoritarian in media repression than they realize, with some heading straight towards Muslim fundamentalism.

At least the religions generally have some sort of standard to go by, versus when "modern audiences" came up with womxn one week and declared it problematic the very next in speedrun of dogma folding in on itself.

That is why these poor new kids can't understand parody in the same way as the old churchy fuddy duddies.

Both of us using "modern audience" as pejorative.

Your reply to me:

Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:
Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:

What is truly funny is how that "modern audience" is trying to become more like Christian fundamentalist authoritarian in media repression than they realize, with some heading straight towards Muslim fundamentalism.

At least the religions generally have some sort of standard to go by, versus when "modern audiences" came up with womxn one week and declared it problematic the very next in speedrun of dogma folding in on itself.

That is why these poor new kids can't understand parody in the same way as the old churchy fuddy duddies.

You are taking my intent behind my words completely wrong. "Wouldn't work with the modern audiences" was simply my way of saying, "people today would cancel it" and not that modern audiences are somehow superior.

You thought I was replying to you. :lunar2019deadpanpig:
Última edición por Kindred Spirit; 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:13 a. m.
vaanomega 7 FEB 2024 a las 8:51 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por ThorianZz:
THIS GAME A SCAM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TOYS with PEOPLE TIME, you build on ONLINE and then simply they turn off the "Official" server, and its gone, all those 30/40/50 h of time, now if you guys have that much time you can LOSE, you poor sacks of no future, but some people have jobs and times, and some still wana play and in 99999 bugs atleast come back to "someting", not to ZERO, NIET, NADA, ZEROOO and then you get trols, litle kids that dont have meaning of time, and think they will live forever losing 5000H in games and ITS NORMAL, NO ITS NOT, if you BUY SOMETING, even if its Fking new you just need to secure peoples time, WE ARE NOT FKING TOYS FOR YOU GUYS TO ♥♥♥♥ OFF TIME OF US.
And btw, 700.000, HOPE THIS ♥♥♥♥ GETS 100.000 in 3 weeks, so this guys that are in the forums talking ♥♥♥♥ about people ho is complaining, with reasons, gets ♥♥♥♥♥♥ on a dead game.

The game is in Early Access, meaning that it's in developpement and in Alpha or Beta phase, anything could happen, especially on servers, if you want to keep your progression, play in your own world
CT-99 STRIKER 7 FEB 2024 a las 8:52 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Rheumathailer:
No Karen its fine.

I like Karens, they keep the prices of salt low with the excessive offer. Capitalism is Beautiful, only second to a nice well made Steak.
MewTressym 7 FEB 2024 a las 8:54 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:
Publicado originalmente por MewTressym:
Dear hypocrite: You cannot push for societal moral justice without being a social justice warrior.

Moral justice can simply be called justice. Justice is moral by its very nature so it's redundant to call it that.

You conveniently left the "Societal" part of that off. Probably intentionally.

Self awareness, not conservatives strong suit.

Burning "witches", starting crusades, enacting inquisitions, and now pretending you aren't exactly the same breed as the modern SJW ilk. Persecuting actually good people in the name of your societal moral fiber as if your societal moral fiber is any different then social justice.

The first people to step up and commit horrible atrocities, are the always self righteous judgemental pricks who think they are enacting "Justice". Justice against the furries? Justice against the conservatives? Justice against the racists/sexists/istiphobes? It's all the same. Your justice is just a farce to cover up your immoral inability to be civil and peacefully get along with others.
maeharaprojekt 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:12 a. m. 
The devs are Japanese, living and working in Japan. Japan is not the USA and is not any flavor of Abrahamic (Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, insert your sect or cult here).

No. Those religions making up less than 3% of the population of Japan do not count. They are effectively non-existent, socially and politically, being hilariously outnumbered by Shinoists in Japan.

Japan sees this SJW vs Moral Majority vs Woke vs NeoCon vs [insert your idealogy] nonsense for what it is:

Somebody Else's Problem.

They have their own, home-grown problems and can't be bothered with yours.
Última edición por maeharaprojekt; 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:16 a. m.
Kindred Spirit 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:14 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por maeharaprojekt:
The devs are Japanese, living and working in Japan. Japan is not the USA and is not any flavor of Abrahamic (Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, insert your sect or cult here).

No. The less than 3% of those religions having adherents in Japan do not count. They are effectively non-existent, socially and politically, being hilariously outnumbered by Shinoists in Japan.

Japan sees this SJW vs Moral Majority vs Woke vs NeoCon vs [insert your idealogy] nonsense for what it is:

Somebody Else's Problem.

They have their own, home-grown problems and can't be bothered with yours.

[Laughs in Street FIghter VI and Body Type 2.]
JackieTheDemon 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:18 a. m. 
Ya'll wanna remove Lovander and just forget Verdash exists.
maeharaprojekt 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:22 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:
Publicado originalmente por maeharaprojekt:
The devs are Japanese, living and working in Japan. Japan is not the USA and is not any flavor of Abrahamic (Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, insert your sect or cult here).

No. The less than 3% of those religions having adherents in Japan do not count. They are effectively non-existent, socially and politically, being hilariously outnumbered by Shinoists in Japan.

Japan sees this SJW vs Moral Majority vs Woke vs NeoCon vs [insert your idealogy] nonsense for what it is:

Somebody Else's Problem.

They have their own, home-grown problems and can't be bothered with yours.

[Laughs in Street FIghter VI and Body Type 2.]

That is not the dunk you think it is. In Japanese games, the origin of "Body Type 1" and "Type 2" is not due to "DEI" and "ESG" - that is conspiracy-theory garbage made up by Westerners. Ease of localization and letting regional distributors take care of it, if its necessary, that is very much a thing.
GroovyHobo 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:23 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:
Go look at your replies prior to those.

Again, I know you weren't speaking about "modern audiences" in a positive manner. This is obvious if you had actually read the post your first reply was confused about, which I helpfully provided with your reply, and then you'd understand that I was merely continuing the pejorative use.

Any confusion here has always been on your part. :cute:

My reply to Sagebrush:

Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:

What is truly funny is how that "modern audience" is trying to become more like Christian fundamentalist authoritarian in media repression than they realize, with some heading straight towards Muslim fundamentalism.

At least the religions generally have some sort of standard to go by, versus when "modern audiences" came up with womxn one week and declared it problematic the very next in speedrun of dogma folding in on itself.

That is why these poor new kids can't understand parody in the same way as the old churchy fuddy duddies.

Both of us using "modern audience" as pejorative.

Your reply to me:

Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:

You are taking my intent behind my words completely wrong. "Wouldn't work with the modern audiences" was simply my way of saying, "people today would cancel it" and not that modern audiences are somehow superior.

You thought I was replying to you. :lunar2019deadpanpig:

Right but the context is a bunch of people were taking me literal as you can see here,

Publicado originalmente por MewTressym:

"Modern audiences" no f that.

Modern audiences is just slang for trying to push your own personal morals on others and the world as a whole is fed up with it. Stop trying to colonize the world with your personal ideology.

We don't care.

I've seen the old school cartoons, and they were funny. Americans are waaaaaaay to comfortable with demanding comedy be silenced and censoring "problematic" things, IE: things they don't like. Well other people DO like those things and you have no right to take that from them. "Well it offends this person" if you're offended that's a you problem not an us problem. YOU need to get help. Not us. YOU need to get offline and go read a book instead. Not us. YOU need to fix your head, not us.

Publicado originalmente por Netsa:
Publicado originalmente por MewTressym:
Modern audiences is just slang for trying to push your own personal morals on others and the world as a whole is fed up with it.
Don't mind me, I'm just setting up a soapbox over here... I'll take it down in a minute, don't worry...

I agree with this except for the "world is fed up with it" part. We like to believe that "modern audiences" are just super enlightened and care about all people, but it's more just that people in general are pretty easy to sway towards whatever the current popular opinion is. The biggest decider is the confidence and passion of the person who's currently speaking.

With the internet, it's easier to gain access to passionate speakers with big view counts and ratios, then assume that whatever they're saying must be right because so many people agree with them. Even if the speaker in question lacks experience and the people that agree with them are anonymous and may not be representative of you whatsoever.

The end result is that the literal modern audience isn't really fed up with it at all, they aren't thinking for themselves and they never really have. Even with the people who say they're fed up with it, many of them are just echoing other people. Here's a scenario:

You're watching a cartoon and see a racy race joke.
If you were watching it alone, you may or may not laugh based on your beliefs at the time.
If you were watching it with friends or a crowd, your laugh is influenced by who you're with.
If you were watching it publicly or as a streamer, your laugh is influenced by how much backlash you think you're going to get by doing one or the other.

See a pattern? Basically, even if you find it funny, you can probably be convinced that it's not funny (and vice versa). When this chilling effect reaches popular people, that effect also gets passed back down after they either make the "wrong move" or take extra time justifying their opinion, and this creates the modern audience.

At the end of the day, the problem isn't whether you laugh, it's how much pressure you were under for having an opinion. People aren't any more accepting of conflicting opinions than they were 100 or 200 years ago, they just carry out their anger differently. We're not at the level where we carry out that anger in the form of debate, though. We still use punishments. Attacks, demonizations, cancellations...

...all the way down to petitions about pink salamanders in video games.

Apologies! I'm taking down the soapbox right now, I swear.
:cozyspaceengineersb::p2cube:

Publicado originalmente por Sagebrush:
"Modern audience" is indeed a forced meme that everyone with a functioning brain is sick of. The thing is more and more of internet-based communications are fake and filtered, producing a manufactured false consensus that doesn't actually reflect reality. It's true many are just consensus-seekers and virtue signallers, but the market is currently speaking.

Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:

What is truly funny is how that "modern audience" is trying to become more like Christian fundamentalist authoritarian in media repression than they realize, with some heading straight towards Muslim fundamentalism.

At least the religions generally have some sort of standard to go by, versus when "modern audiences" came up with womxn one week and declared it problematic the very next in speedrun of dogma folding in on itself.

That is why these poor new kids can't understand parody in the same way as the old churchy fuddy duddies.
Noisa. 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:23 a. m. 
Bet you look just like Lovander, so you are the only case where ingame character is representing someone in real life.
Kindred Spirit 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:24 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por JackieTheDemon:
Ya'll wanna remove Lovander and just forget Verdash exists.

Petallia, Dazzi, etc.
GroovyHobo 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:24 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por MewTressym:
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:

Moral justice can simply be called justice. Justice is moral by its very nature so it's redundant to call it that.

You conveniently left the "Societal" part of that off. Probably intentionally.

Self awareness, not conservatives strong suit.

Burning "witches", starting crusades, enacting inquisitions, and now pretending you aren't exactly the same breed as the modern SJW ilk. Persecuting actually good people in the name of your societal moral fiber as if your societal moral fiber is any different then social justice.

The first people to step up and commit horrible atrocities, are the always self righteous judgemental pricks who think they are enacting "Justice". Justice against the furries? Justice against the conservatives? Justice against the racists/sexists/istiphobes? It's all the same. Your justice is just a farce to cover up your immoral inability to be civil and peacefully get along with others.

There is no "societal" justice in a moral justice system. And most of those situations were evidence of a corrupted justice system and not a moral one.
Última edición por GroovyHobo; 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:26 a. m.
Kindred Spirit 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:27 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:
Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:

Again, I know you weren't speaking about "modern audiences" in a positive manner. This is obvious if you had actually read the post your first reply was confused about, which I helpfully provided with your reply, and then you'd understand that I was merely continuing the pejorative use.

Any confusion here has always been on your part. :cute:

My reply to Sagebrush:



Both of us using "modern audience" as pejorative.

Your reply to me:



You thought I was replying to you. :lunar2019deadpanpig:

Right but the context is a bunch of people were taking me literal as you can see here,

Publicado originalmente por MewTressym:

"Modern audiences" no f that.

Modern audiences is just slang for trying to push your own personal morals on others and the world as a whole is fed up with it. Stop trying to colonize the world with your personal ideology.

We don't care.

I've seen the old school cartoons, and they were funny. Americans are waaaaaaay to comfortable with demanding comedy be silenced and censoring "problematic" things, IE: things they don't like. Well other people DO like those things and you have no right to take that from them. "Well it offends this person" if you're offended that's a you problem not an us problem. YOU need to get help. Not us. YOU need to get offline and go read a book instead. Not us. YOU need to fix your head, not us.

Publicado originalmente por Netsa:
Don't mind me, I'm just setting up a soapbox over here... I'll take it down in a minute, don't worry...

I agree with this except for the "world is fed up with it" part. We like to believe that "modern audiences" are just super enlightened and care about all people, but it's more just that people in general are pretty easy to sway towards whatever the current popular opinion is. The biggest decider is the confidence and passion of the person who's currently speaking.

With the internet, it's easier to gain access to passionate speakers with big view counts and ratios, then assume that whatever they're saying must be right because so many people agree with them. Even if the speaker in question lacks experience and the people that agree with them are anonymous and may not be representative of you whatsoever.

The end result is that the literal modern audience isn't really fed up with it at all, they aren't thinking for themselves and they never really have. Even with the people who say they're fed up with it, many of them are just echoing other people. Here's a scenario:

You're watching a cartoon and see a racy race joke.
If you were watching it alone, you may or may not laugh based on your beliefs at the time.
If you were watching it with friends or a crowd, your laugh is influenced by who you're with.
If you were watching it publicly or as a streamer, your laugh is influenced by how much backlash you think you're going to get by doing one or the other.

See a pattern? Basically, even if you find it funny, you can probably be convinced that it's not funny (and vice versa). When this chilling effect reaches popular people, that effect also gets passed back down after they either make the "wrong move" or take extra time justifying their opinion, and this creates the modern audience.

At the end of the day, the problem isn't whether you laugh, it's how much pressure you were under for having an opinion. People aren't any more accepting of conflicting opinions than they were 100 or 200 years ago, they just carry out their anger differently. We're not at the level where we carry out that anger in the form of debate, though. We still use punishments. Attacks, demonizations, cancellations...

...all the way down to petitions about pink salamanders in video games.

Apologies! I'm taking down the soapbox right now, I swear.
:cozyspaceengineersb::p2cube:

Publicado originalmente por Sagebrush:
"Modern audience" is indeed a forced meme that everyone with a functioning brain is sick of. The thing is more and more of internet-based communications are fake and filtered, producing a manufactured false consensus that doesn't actually reflect reality. It's true many are just consensus-seekers and virtue signallers, but the market is currently speaking.

Publicado originalmente por Chief Redpill:

What is truly funny is how that "modern audience" is trying to become more like Christian fundamentalist authoritarian in media repression than they realize, with some heading straight towards Muslim fundamentalism.

At least the religions generally have some sort of standard to go by, versus when "modern audiences" came up with womxn one week and declared it problematic the very next in speedrun of dogma folding in on itself.

That is why these poor new kids can't understand parody in the same way as the old churchy fuddy duddies.

The only one remotely speaking about "modern audiences" in such a manner is Netsa and only in pointing out how it is a naive ideal used to sway [Current Thing]. Sound familiar? The rest are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ on the concept. How is this difficult for you to understand?

Also, "wouldn't work with a modern audience" is why some things were breakaway hits, while pandering towards a modern audience accidentally gets Ken nominated for an Oscar.
Última edición por Kindred Spirit; 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:30 a. m.
MewTressym 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:29 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por GroovyHobo:
There is no "societal" justice in a moral justice system. And most of those situations were evidence of a corrupted justice system and not a moral one.

You really don't see the connection even still. Do you think the SJW Moderns see themselves as not acting out of moral virtue? They absolutely espouse moral virtue as the reasoning for what they do. They just have different morals then SJW Classic. And both of them are intentionally fed their morals by an oligarchy that uses it all to control them both. You aren't a hero for saying Lovander should removed, you're a self righteous hypocrite with zero self reflection and nothing but a tourist who thinks they know better then the community they're trying to infiltrate.

Like, for real, get off steam tourist. Go away. Steam has games that cater to Furries, Lolicons, Shotacons, incest lovers, and every form of degeneracy, and you are on steam. If you are on the platform supporting it you are supporting a platform that actively caters to every degeneracy you say you oppose. So do the world a favor, and delete your steam account and kindly GTFO.
Última edición por MewTressym; 7 FEB 2024 a las 9:31 a. m.
< >
Mostrando 316-330 de 665 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 26 ENE 2024 a las 7:53 a. m.
Mensajes: 665