Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
First off: Don't reach for insults. It doesn't help your argument.
Second: It's already been proven that assets haven't been stolen. The models have completely different topologies which suggests that they were all made by scratch. You can argue that they used Pokemon models as a reference to make something very similar, but that isn't the same as stealing assets.
It's actually quite normal for companies to purchase music and graphical assets from outside of the development studio for their games, Nintendo themselves have historically been known to do this for textures and sound effects in some of their biggest titles, including Super Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time. This isn't a problem, it's only a problem when a game is nothing but those assets with no changes, which is CLEARLY not the case here.
It's the intentionally vague "justice if you can afford it" system the west has that leads to things like Bethesda literally owning the word "Scrolls" and countless other idiotic examples of the legal system being abused.
By the strict definition of what law? American Law? European Law?
None of the models are identical. Any 3D modeler that looks at it points out that the models themselves are clearly different, which you can tell because the wireframe meshes don't match at all. They're pointing out other areas of concern,
And most importantly, coypright is not taught before you left high school. Copyright is not something most people learn about at all.
Well they say ignorance is bliss.
You can't copyright a concept, all the designs are obviously not stolen. It's copyright, not similarright. Right now the only relevant discussion in terms of copyright is about the models, which are conclusively not Pokemon original models given they have an obviously different wireframe mesh.
I know Nintendo ♥♥♥♥♥♥ your wife or something but this black and white narrative of people questioning things somehow equals shilling for a corporation is retarded. So is blind hatred for it, really.
Okay so now lets just say that they traced the stolen assets. Still illegal.
they are right
come on guys, I dont even support them, the last games by Gamefreak were absolute ♥♥♥♥.
But the assets of this game, the Pals, are 100% copied by Pokemon. Just look Luxio, Lucario, Wooloo etc. they are identical.
Nintendo is right.
One look at their crafting animations and you think that they aren't just flipping assets? Bro it's the exact same animation that fortnite has. You have to be trolling.