If Palworld copied, then so did Pokemon

[D. Flame]

If Palworld copied, then so did Pokemon:

https://i.imgur.com/Lj5ngGU.jpg

[krishnath.dragon]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Evil_Befall:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από krishnath.dragon:

Nintendo might, but they'd lose in court, just like they did when they sued Temtem.

Yeah clearly game freak thinks it's not copying from pokemon or they would have sue them
But sounds more like nintendo and nintendo fans are salty it's not on switch

Gamefreak doesn't actually own any of the Pokemon IP, it's all owned by Nintendo. And if they decide to sue, they will lose in court, again. As the game is not actually infringing on their IP.

[XRYXIX]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Wölki:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από christenedchryzz:

Yeah digimon came out first actually lol

i just went to wiki it seems to be that digimon was later. what am i missing?

Yo sorry I was told wrong I thought digimon came out first but pokemon did by 1 year they were mad close compatibly but they are pretty different concepts with how they go about the mons and characters

[LNX BDSKZ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από D. Flame:

If Palworld copied, then so did Pokemon:

https://i.imgur.com/Lj5ngGU.jpg

Make sure not to forget about Megami Tensei 1/2 inventing the genre of Monster Tamers, and yeah, if we were to listen to these supid Pokemon Stans who want want new Monster Tamer sued then Pokemon should've been sued by DQ and SMT/Persona.

Some subsets of Pokemon fans are just so delusional they'll foam at the mouth attacking anyone else they think is taking any form of inspiration from a multi billion dollar corporation.
Terminally online weirdos.
This is why I prefer looking at Pokemon fancontent and such instead of interacting with the fandom.
Nutjobs like that are one of several groups of vocal minority in the community that are so overwhelmingly vocal it's unbearable.

[lnomsim]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από THANKS OBAMA:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Evil_Befall:

If game freak really gave a damn about other creators using
creature collecting in there games
Digimon wouldn't even have even exist anymore
they would have sued them
And fact digimon still exist proofs they don't care

Digimon came out before Pokemon did lmao.

Pokémon:1995
Digimon:1997

[LNX BDSKZ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Baphled:

Dragon Warrior Monsters (or Dragon Quest Monsters) was an amazing gameboy game that came out about 2 years after the first Pokemon games. There's a lot to be desired in the game, but it had (and still has) some of the best monster breeding mechanics of any monster collecting game.

Also to be fair, there's been a million monster designs over the years, even prior to Pokemon. A lot of them are based on real animals, and it's difficult to make something completely removed from any similarity to previous monsters. To be more fair, the creators of Palworld did use the models of Pokemon for their base and made modifications to get them to be unique enough. I'm completely ok with this.

Dragon Quest 5 [The first with monster taming] released in 1992, Pokemon green released 1996.
Megaten 1 released 1987.

Pokemon was years away from being the first. This is why it is utterly infuriating seeing Pokemon stans attack other franchises, ESPECIALLY dragon Quest and Megaten/SMT/Persona, Nintendo Direct livestream chat during trailers for SMTV were some of the most insufferable cancerous messes I have seen, toxic children raging claiming it was a Persona/Pokemon/Undertale ripoff when it fathered all 3 of those franchises in different ways.

[MrSoul]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Drianikaben:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Wölki:

i just went to wiki it seems to be that digimon was later. what am i missing?

Digimon was definitely after pokemon. Idk where this argument came from, but i've been seeing it for years. Digimon started in 1997 as virtual pets, a counterpart to tamagatchi. Pokemon started as a video game in early 1996.

The first digimon game was september 98.

The first pokemon episode was april 1997. Digimon was august 99. It's not even close. Pokemon was at it's full popularity 2 full years before digimon.

Thank you xD
Skimming so didn't bother to do this myself. I get feeling most kids in here, and spreading that, aren't old enough to know what a tamagotchi is, let alone have owned one of any kind growing up. If really wanna strain my brain, some ish' a youtuber said one day now taken as fact xD

[BigMilkCartonsYT]

ah yes, the same photo everyone is reposting like its a gotcha response, when its a handful of designs from 27 years ago. youre really sticking it to em with that one lmao

[Banz]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Evil_Befall:

If game freak really gave a damn about other creators using
creature collecting in there games
Digimon wouldn't even have even exist anymore
they would have sued them
And fact digimon still exist proofs they don't care

That's rubbish. Pokemon doesn't even own the creature capturing genre

[Biff]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από D. Flame:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Baphled:

Dragon Warrior Monsters (or Dragon Quest Monsters) was an amazing gameboy game that came out about 2 years after the first Pokemon games. There's a lot to be desired in the game, but it had (and still has) some of the best monster breeding mechanics of any monster collecting game.

Also to be fair, there's been a million monster designs over the years, even prior to Pokemon. A lot of them are based on real animals, and it's difficult to make something completely removed from any similarity to previous monsters. To be more fair, the creators of Palworld did use the models of Pokemon for their base and made modifications to get them to be unique enough. I'm completely ok with this.

Pokémon released in 1996. Dragon Quest released in 1986. It came first by like a decade.

Not only that but Pokemon was a straight ripoff of dragon quest *5* which didn't release until 1992 (4 years before pokemon). DQ5 not only had the designs that people claim game freak copied but it also introduced the monster capturing mechanic that was used and built upon in Pokemon.

Everyone knew this back in the day and were fine with it. So it's kind of Ironic watching Pokemon fans lose their mind over pal world.

[Shamurai]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Last Place:

Do some of you really not know that Creature Collecting is a genre that has existed outside of pokemon?

We're talking about a demographic who have only ever played Pokemon, the only books they've read were Harry Potter, and the only films they ever seen were (Disney) Star Wars.

[D. Flame]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από BigMilkCartonsYT:

ah yes, the same photo everyone is reposting like its a gotcha response, when its a handful of designs from 27 years ago. youre really sticking it to em with that one lmao

"if it happened a long time ago, then it didn't happen at all" - pokemon fans, literally

[D. Flame]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από ilduce:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Last Place:

Do some of you really not know that Creature Collecting is a genre that has existed outside of pokemon?

We're talking about a demographic who have only ever played Pokemon, the only books they've read were Harry Potter, and the only films they ever seen were (Disney) Star Wars.

Fair. Dragon quest is probably older than most of them.

[Evil_Befall]

palmon even outsold pokemon scarlet and violet

[geeki101]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Rae:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από `digitaL.braVo:

Nintenbros seething that this is the game people wanted and they shat out Pokemon Go.

This isn't the game I wanted to play in place of pokemon bro lmao. This is entirely different. Nintendo won't give a rats ass about this hot mess of a game and community when the mods start rolling out to turn it into an ugly monstrosity. I know us pokemon fans are in our 30s now but I still don't want my childhood pokemon with guns, to be enslaved and put to hard labor or to butcher them and sell them to a black market. This is closer to Ark than pokemon anyway.

stop pearl clutching just cause the devs you shill for haven't released a good game in over a decade and instead of adding to the formula they just make it easier, you call this game a "hot mess" then whats Pokémon? you think its better cause it hasn't added anything in over a decade? this whole attitude of Pokémon not being "tainted" and "ruining childhood" bs is why the games stayed the same and just got easier so they could attract the only 2 people braindead enough to play the tripe fanboys and children

oh also looking at those sales numbers, active players and the fact Nintendo officially responded id say palworld lives in there head rent free they clearly cant sue on anything cause they would of already done it as Japan were BOTH companies are based has 0 fair use lmao

[geeki101]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Zaltys:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Pontianak Tamer:

You literally tire or weaken them to a point of death or exhaustion then capture them. Of course they 'chose' to be captured.
By your insane logic, roofies in clubs are perfectly fine and willing on the victim's end.

It is what the series states. Also used to explain why you can't capture roofied fainted Pokemon.

i like how you ignored all the other points lmao, they are still used for labour and some have horrific descriptions but you keep living in you're fantasy pal, it would be like me making a game were you punch kids into submission then when somone was like "why do you beat kids in you're game" i just go "woah woah the baby just had to know you were strong enough to chose you!" if anything you just proved the pokemon world is inconsistent with terrible writing