this game has been stealing designs from many artists and games

[Lil Silly Vert]

if you bought the game, you're supporting designs that have been stolen from artists and games

SOURCE: https://vxtwitter.com/Saetapocha1/status/1718232547073655110
SOURCE: https://x.com/AutumnRaptor1/status/1747658670706409952?s=20

[[EX]DRAG0N]

Don't care. Cry more noob.

[ChibiPiiee]

Originally posted by Vertigoism:

if you bought the game, you're supporting designs that have been stolen from artists and games

SOURCE: https://vxtwitter.com/Saetapocha1/status/1718232547073655110
SOURCE: https://x.com/AutumnRaptor1/status/1747658670706409952?s=20

The people who made Palworld, have also bought the rights to use several assets/permission to use assets. It's not unusual for game company's to use assets from other games. It happens a lot. A lot of times they can just take and use them, because some just put them out there.

If they get sued, they get sued. But, I doubt they will. You can take inspiration from games, and make it your own; without copying/stealing anything. I see similarities in the game, for sure. But, they aren't quite the same.

[Slayrix]

First link I can't figure out what you are talking about, are you suggesting that just because someone made a pokemon that had arms like that, that means no one else can ever make a pokemon design that is close to that? I mean they don't even look identical, they didn't steal anything... second link just straight up doesn't work, your point was?

[Kackstift]

stop crying..

[Dankcove]

Bro literally the second link straight says "Someone should bust Pokémon for doing the same thing then, lmao." What point were you trying to make there dummy.

[yoyohayliTTV]

They literally haven't been stolen. It's PARODY. And why are you so upset about this ONE creature-collecting game when DOZENS have been made before, and Nintendo has NOT gone after them, either? Clearly, Nintendo doesn't see an issue. OF COURSE designs that include animal elements will resemble designs independently created that feature the same animal elements...because there are only so many ways to make a dog or a cat or a horse or an elephant or etc etc.

Nintendo and TPC have known about this game for the 3 years while it was in development. Why would they SUDDENLY have issue with it AFTER it has come out? They don't see an issue with it. You've jumped on a bandwagon that you don't even fully understand (IP theft and design copying) and are just ITCHING to accuse SOMEONE of doing Bad Thing (TM) just so you can feel self-righteous.

Go play some TemTem next.

[Silverlight]

I hope it steals ponyta next.~~

[IronPrimarch]

*sees angy post*
*buys second copy*

[Kharnzor]

Originally posted by IronPrimarch:

*sees angy post*
*buys second copy*
:3079o_o:

Yep lol

[Innominatam]

Originally posted by alan0n:

Now, now, now. The numerous legal scholars on this forum have repeatedly assured me that as long as this game isn't turn based then it cannot be subject to copyright or trademark infringement.

Nintendo cannot claim copywright over a concept you do realize pokemon themselves have taken designs from other games like dragon quest.

Just because one game makes a different version of an electric mouse the other game cannot claim they stole their IP.

Because you cannot COPYWRIGHT CONCEPTS pokemon can only claim copyright over their designs EXACTLY

[Carnatux]

The first source was debunked when the artist found a trailer from 2 years prior to their drawing of the said "copied" work. they already apologized and said it was an coincidence.

[Cumbusted]

Not that you can do anything with them, but I wish I was stupid enough to post for clown awards.