Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Pokemon fanboys can get F'd.
If Digimon can exist, so can this.
TPC, must have patented the idea of capturing creatures, as well as trademarked every single creature that could possible exist within the known universe....
All jokes aside, if you had used your eyes you would have seen other topics like this, with plenty of people explaining why this will not get a lawsuit, nor would they have any grounds, to do so.
eat them
use them as ammo
and so on
it will be so much fun!
Non-Pokemon creature collector games aren't exactly rare though.
Just a few examples of ones that haven't been taken down by lawsuits:
TemTem
Cassette Beasts
Monster Sanctuary
Siralim
Monster Rancher
Digimon
Rhapsody a Musical Adventure
La Pucelle
Slime Rancher
TemTem was one that people kept saying was going to get sued and didn't.
Not a lawyer, so I could be off, but that's the gist of how I remember it from the last time it was explained to me.
Since the Lapras design for one of the pals is based off Nessie and the Dinosaurs that had the similar build.
So even if the pokemon is blue and looks similar to Lapras, it's more or less comedy and a parody.
That's another thing to take in to account.
This game is more or less a PARODY of pokemon.
Same as the Animal rights advocates versions of Pokemon.
Moemon and so on too.