hello broken arrow vs Warno i want the game but here are 2 types.

[OweOmePRO❤]

title

[Real Slick 1]

Put the games away and take a language class first.

[soldier6661111]

They are 1 type - arcadey RTT games. They are two games though.

[Sneaky_Beaky]

Warno is better.

[Pestilence]

Warno is better in many ways, but the biggest issue with Warno for me is the super slow developement and very low player count. No matchmaking and low player counts means a lot of wasted time in lobbies. Also people quitting games right as they start and other nonsense. In Broken Arrow, if you quit, you cant join another game until the one you quit is over. Warno should have that too.

[Mighty-Python-20]

on a whole WARNO but Broken Arrow can be fun but as mentioned above its an arcade game vs WARNO. check out you tube content to help you decide.

[soldier6661111]

Originally posted by Mighty-Python-20:

on a whole WARNO but Broken Arrow can be fun but as mentioned above its an arcade game vs WARNO. check out you tube content to help you decide.

Both are arcade games.

[Abacus]

broken arrow looks cool, but Warno is just a larger project with a greater refined system. Soon the army general will come out. i'd wait to see that.

Broken arrow devs make a lot of AA strategy games, so they understand they genre.

[AnDroiD->>]

yeah WARNO needs to stop the current lobby format of multiplaying and utilise a system like war thunders or h.l.l. / more like a constant here u go jump in if u want. and fill teh gaps with ai... that way theres always a game going on.

[ArmedGhost-]

Originally posted by Real Slick 1:

Put the games away and take a language class first.

LMAOOO

[ArmedGhost-]

Originally posted by Simply B:

broken arrow looks cool, but Warno is just a larger project with a greater refined system. Soon the army general will come out. i'd wait to see that.

Broken arrow devs make a lot of AA strategy games, so they understand they genre.

Being playing the hell out of Broken Arrow, but I so far I defiantly prefer the gameplay in Warno over Broken Arrow personally.

[ArmedGhost-]

Originally posted by soldier6661111:

Originally posted by Mighty-Python-20:

on a whole WARNO but Broken Arrow can be fun but as mentioned above its an arcade game vs WARNO. check out you tube content to help you decide.

Both are arcade games.

Thousands of languages and this dudes speaks full on clown.

[ArmedGhost-]

Originally posted by Rollonleviking:

Warno looks like a 20 years old RTS. Broken Arrow is beautiful.

Originally posted by Rollonleviking:

Also paradropping in Broken Arrow is so good !

Originally posted by Rollonleviking:

And reconnect to last battle before joining the next...
Good feature! Prevents at least a cascade of players leaving!

bro just yapping

[ickylevel]

Broken arrow is less refined, less straight to the point than WARNO, which is totally understandable. It's normal that WARNO would be better, since it's a refined version of eugen's past games.

[ras shvrebi vano]

warno

[Elerik]

Warno is better but ticking points create frustrating moments around just one or two capture zones. In Broken Arrow fight is at larger area and more chaotic which is great. And match is not decided except moment when enemy capture all points. In Warno when one side get +X ticks that create desperate situation so everybody are focused to play balanced middle map games all the time. Once its broken players simply disconnect, for many there is no point to play more because after 20 minutes balanced meat grinding, break through means game end in couple of minutes with minimum chance to get back