WARNO
Vomitous Oct 4, 2022 @ 7:17am
Depleted Uranium AP rounds
Used by Americans in 20mm, 25mm, 30mm, 120mm
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
[EUG] MadMat  [developer] Oct 4, 2022 @ 9:42am 
We've limited DU rounds for high-end tanks and countries actually using them:
* M1A1(HA)
* T-80U & UD
* AMX-30 BRENNUS
[ING] Ingvarplay Oct 5, 2022 @ 1:03am 
Originally posted by Miskyavine:
Originally posted by EUG MadMat:
We've limited DU rounds for high-end tanks and countries actually using them:
* M1A1(HA)
* T-80U & UD
* AMX-30 BRENNUS

Oh is that why the M60A3 TTS has the lowest AP of all NATO 105s despite the M833 having the highest RL pen of any in service 105 of the cold war? and the only round that ever surpassed it was the M900 Also for non DU shells how is the Normal AMX-30/AMX-10RCs have higher AP then the DM-33 the highest penning non DU 105? and if USSR gets acsess to all the rare ammo they had at full AP weres the M900 on the M1s? why does the M1A1HA lose a bunch of AP because of rarity of M829A1 but the T80U/UD get the stats as if every single AP round they fire is a post cold war BM-46?

Also wtf is with the the non T80U/UD 125 have 18 AP if they arent using DU BM-42? because if they arent yikes because T80BVs should by all means be sporting BM-26 and NSWP should only have BM-15 thats what they had... not the rare AF even today BM-42 lmao

what about ammo types like the 25mm Bradley that only used DU ap ammo you just make up a random arbitrary stat for them and call it good?

TOW-2A were that at? like literally the mainline TOW-2

AT-4 lmao what a joke of a AT choice down right pathetic that its locked to one div or 2 ♥♥♥♥♥♥ units in 8th when it was THE mainline LAT for all US divisions even outnumbering all M72 variants by nearly twice and its been proven to you a hundred times. especially compared to all the liberties taken with the PACT lats the AT-4 is the worst of the advanced LATs and its so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ rare its not funny despite being the most prolific of all the advanced LATs.

Weres the MIM-23C/D PIP-2 70% of the I-Hawks in the US aresenal? Weres the MIM-23E PIP-3 the other 30% US didnt even maintain MIM-23Bs in 1989 lmao

MIM-72G Chapperal were the missile stats at? lon ger range then the Roland 2/3 by several KM but shortest range of all medium sized AA also missing its 8 reload missiles because someone yall cant figure out a simple GFX effect that even WiC had around 17 years ago

Also speaking of missing reloads weres the Avengers reloads? you guys even modeled the extra missile storage yet forgot the extra missiles? weird that only happens to one countries units.


What AP round is the M60A3 Using? because in 1989 US only stocked M833 105s because of the radiation leaks of M774 unless M60A3 is supposed to have HEAT for some ahistorical BS reason you prolly thought up. Should be same stats as the DM-33(105) is the Leo 1A5 has but with 1 more AP

What shells is even the AMX-30/AMX-10RCs even using ingame? because no remotely intimeframe French ammo anyone can find can remote justify why there 4-5 AP higher then they should be or how the 50-70mm armor somehow justify 12 F/A

Also explains why the pivads cant even defend itself from APCs lmao

Warno should have in its Marketing punish excellence reward mediocrity making the worst units falsely just as good as some of the best units ever made lmao As always everyone gets extreme liberties taken for buffs US pays a 20-50% perfmormance tax and misses out on a ton of intimeframe equipment while everyone else rocks 1990s prototypes/units with massively inflated stats. Any reason or is to you the US still "dEmoRaLiZeD bY vIEtNaM"?

Realistic ww3 battle simulater? more like sad communist propaganda. But not shocking compared to the Axis treatment in SD-2 the only shocking part about that one is the Axis cant play as 33rd Waffen Grenadier Division.

Realism when it cripples the US balance when it cripples the US Realism when it buffs everyone else balance when it bufffs everyone else. The EUgen way.

lol. This game is a nato army simulator
Originally posted by Miskyavine:
Originally posted by EUG MadMat:
We've limited DU rounds for high-end tanks and countries actually using them:
* M1A1(HA)
* T-80U & UD
* AMX-30 BRENNUS

Oh is that why the M60A3 TTS has the lowest AP of all NATO 105s despite the M833 having the highest RL pen of any in service 105 of the cold war? and the only round that ever surpassed it was the M900 Also for non DU shells how is the Normal AMX-30/AMX-10RCs have higher AP then the DM-33 the highest penning non DU 105? and if USSR gets acsess to all the rare ammo they had at full AP weres the M900 on the M1s? ...
Wait for it...

Originally posted by Miskyavine:
... Realistic ww3 battle simulater? more like sad communist propaganda. But not shocking compared to the Axis treatment in SD-2 the only shocking part about that one is the Axis cant play as 33rd Waffen Grenadier Division.
There it is! You're omitting two very important letters from that division's designation, aren't you?
Vomitous Oct 5, 2022 @ 9:04am 
Originally posted by ingvarson:
Originally posted by Miskyavine:

Oh is that why the M60A3 TTS has the lowest AP of all NATO 105s despite the M833 having the highest RL pen of any in service 105 of the cold war? and the only round that ever surpassed it was the M900 Also for non DU shells how is the Normal AMX-30/AMX-10RCs have higher AP then the DM-33 the highest penning non DU 105? and if USSR gets acsess to all the rare ammo they had at full AP weres the M900 on the M1s? why does the M1A1HA lose a bunch of AP because of rarity of M829A1 but the T80U/UD get the stats as if every single AP round they fire is a post cold war BM-46?

Also wtf is with the the non T80U/UD 125 have 18 AP if they arent using DU BM-42? because if they arent yikes because T80BVs should by all means be sporting BM-26 and NSWP should only have BM-15 thats what they had... not the rare AF even today BM-42 lmao

what about ammo types like the 25mm Bradley that only used DU ap ammo you just make up a random arbitrary stat for them and call it good?

TOW-2A were that at? like literally the mainline TOW-2

AT-4 lmao what a joke of a AT choice down right pathetic that its locked to one div or 2 ♥♥♥♥♥♥ units in 8th when it was THE mainline LAT for all US divisions even outnumbering all M72 variants by nearly twice and its been proven to you a hundred times. especially compared to all the liberties taken with the PACT lats the AT-4 is the worst of the advanced LATs and its so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ rare its not funny despite being the most prolific of all the advanced LATs.

Weres the MIM-23C/D PIP-2 70% of the I-Hawks in the US aresenal? Weres the MIM-23E PIP-3 the other 30% US didnt even maintain MIM-23Bs in 1989 lmao

MIM-72G Chapperal were the missile stats at? lon ger range then the Roland 2/3 by several KM but shortest range of all medium sized AA also missing its 8 reload missiles because someone yall cant figure out a simple GFX effect that even WiC had around 17 years ago

Also speaking of missing reloads weres the Avengers reloads? you guys even modeled the extra missile storage yet forgot the extra missiles? weird that only happens to one countries units.


What AP round is the M60A3 Using? because in 1989 US only stocked M833 105s because of the radiation leaks of M774 unless M60A3 is supposed to have HEAT for some ahistorical BS reason you prolly thought up. Should be same stats as the DM-33(105) is the Leo 1A5 has but with 1 more AP

What shells is even the AMX-30/AMX-10RCs even using ingame? because no remotely intimeframe French ammo anyone can find can remote justify why there 4-5 AP higher then they should be or how the 50-70mm armor somehow justify 12 F/A

Also explains why the pivads cant even defend itself from APCs lmao

Warno should have in its Marketing punish excellence reward mediocrity making the worst units falsely just as good as some of the best units ever made lmao As always everyone gets extreme liberties taken for buffs US pays a 20-50% perfmormance tax and misses out on a ton of intimeframe equipment while everyone else rocks 1990s prototypes/units with massively inflated stats. Any reason or is to you the US still "dEmoRaLiZeD bY vIEtNaM"?

Realistic ww3 battle simulater? more like sad communist propaganda. But not shocking compared to the Axis treatment in SD-2 the only shocking part about that one is the Axis cant play as 33rd Waffen Grenadier Division.

Realism when it cripples the US balance when it cripples the US Realism when it buffs everyone else balance when it bufffs everyone else. The EUgen way.

He convinced me Im not buying this game, whenever it is released.
Cryptic Oct 5, 2022 @ 4:20pm 
Originally posted by ㅇㅇ:
Originally posted by ingvarson:

He convinced me Im not buying this game, whenever it is released.
It's a decent game but miskyavine brought up good points

I just wish there wasn't so much over balancing to the point of losing realism
Last edited by Cryptic; Oct 5, 2022 @ 4:53pm
Captain Fubar Oct 5, 2022 @ 6:14pm 
Originally posted by ingvarson:
Originally posted by Miskyavine:

Oh is that why the M60A3 TTS has the lowest AP of all NATO 105s despite the M833 having the highest RL pen of any in service 105 of the cold war? and the only round that ever surpassed it was the M900 Also for non DU shells how is the Normal AMX-30/AMX-10RCs have higher AP then the DM-33 the highest penning non DU 105? and if USSR gets acsess to all the rare ammo they had at full AP weres the M900 on the M1s? why does the M1A1HA lose a bunch of AP because of rarity of M829A1 but the T80U/UD get the stats as if every single AP round they fire is a post cold war BM-46?

Also wtf is with the the non T80U/UD 125 have 18 AP if they arent using DU BM-42? because if they arent yikes because T80BVs should by all means be sporting BM-26 and NSWP should only have BM-15 thats what they had... not the rare AF even today BM-42 lmao

what about ammo types like the 25mm Bradley that only used DU ap ammo you just make up a random arbitrary stat for them and call it good?

TOW-2A were that at? like literally the mainline TOW-2

AT-4 lmao what a joke of a AT choice down right pathetic that its locked to one div or 2 ♥♥♥♥♥♥ units in 8th when it was THE mainline LAT for all US divisions even outnumbering all M72 variants by nearly twice and its been proven to you a hundred times. especially compared to all the liberties taken with the PACT lats the AT-4 is the worst of the advanced LATs and its so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ rare its not funny despite being the most prolific of all the advanced LATs.

Weres the MIM-23C/D PIP-2 70% of the I-Hawks in the US aresenal? Weres the MIM-23E PIP-3 the other 30% US didnt even maintain MIM-23Bs in 1989 lmao

MIM-72G Chapperal were the missile stats at? lon ger range then the Roland 2/3 by several KM but shortest range of all medium sized AA also missing its 8 reload missiles because someone yall cant figure out a simple GFX effect that even WiC had around 17 years ago

Also speaking of missing reloads weres the Avengers reloads? you guys even modeled the extra missile storage yet forgot the extra missiles? weird that only happens to one countries units.


What AP round is the M60A3 Using? because in 1989 US only stocked M833 105s because of the radiation leaks of M774 unless M60A3 is supposed to have HEAT for some ahistorical BS reason you prolly thought up. Should be same stats as the DM-33(105) is the Leo 1A5 has but with 1 more AP

What shells is even the AMX-30/AMX-10RCs even using ingame? because no remotely intimeframe French ammo anyone can find can remote justify why there 4-5 AP higher then they should be or how the 50-70mm armor somehow justify 12 F/A

Also explains why the pivads cant even defend itself from APCs lmao

Warno should have in its Marketing punish excellence reward mediocrity making the worst units falsely just as good as some of the best units ever made lmao As always everyone gets extreme liberties taken for buffs US pays a 20-50% perfmormance tax and misses out on a ton of intimeframe equipment while everyone else rocks 1990s prototypes/units with massively inflated stats. Any reason or is to you the US still "dEmoRaLiZeD bY vIEtNaM"?

Realistic ww3 battle simulater? more like sad communist propaganda. But not shocking compared to the Axis treatment in SD-2 the only shocking part about that one is the Axis cant play as 33rd Waffen Grenadier Division.

Realism when it cripples the US balance when it cripples the US Realism when it buffs everyone else balance when it bufffs everyone else. The EUgen way.

lol. This game is a nato army simulator
you have porridge for brains if you think this is communicst propaganda. This entire post is just annoying schizo posting.
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Oct 4, 2022 @ 7:17am
Posts: 6