Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Tho I agree some of the quality of lifes in warno are welcome.
Funny, let Warno try beat Wargame: Red Dragon score of Milion of copies sold in first half year from realase then we can talk of Wargame dieing... Warno as i alweys said function only on cycle of Sale/update while RD wichout updates/and less sales beat population of Warno a few times...
I personally don't see a major issue with the balance. Red and Blue seem to me to have fairly decent representations of their strengths and weaknesses. Yes, I can pick nits on whether a unit should have a 3 vs a 4 for front armor, or if it should cost a bit more or less. I'm all for fine tuning it. I just don't want to see actual units made to be equivalents of each other, etc.
Liked the additions in Steel Division more, but I'm not that into WW2 so I didn't play them as much as I should (fully expect to go back to SD2 at some point though)
So WARNO is like the best of both worlds for me - the other titles where absolutely good though, or I wouldn't have bought them.