Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The 20AP even against the 17-19AV non superheavy tanks was close to useless. M1A1, Leo2A4, Chally 1. While in WARNO currently almost every NATO tank has 17+ AV except the very few M60...
In ALB where guns were more inaccurate and the 17AV+ tanks were few also worth more.
Great for pushing a 1v1 tank battle in your favor
Also flank shots
They are meant to be support vehicles for infantry, not taking tanks head on
I love BMP 2, as creeping them along with infantry in woods, basically smashes blue infantry
Their armor is enough to survive a hit from infantry rockets, and can often stun infantry before the second rocket fires
Well i had 2 BMP-2s with a t-80bv go against another t-80bv and all 3 died
but still they were all firing on the single tank, and only one hit landed that did very minor damage
t-80 kills both of my BMPs with basically no damage taken
And his tank blasted your IFV’s…. Whats the issue?
In general, the BMP-2 is intended to serve as anti-infantry/anti-helicopter fire support, while the BMP-1 is more focused on anti-light-vehicle fire support with its 73mm cannon. Their ATGMs are there to give them a way to fight back if they stumble into enemy MBTs, but they're not tank destroyers; their first and foremost duty is to deliver their troops to their destination.