Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
You're probably better off finding another server regardless of whether or not you can report them for this.
Just don't respond to their toxicity. Ignore them, and if you feel targetted too much through non-text (pvp, pve griefing), then you may just need to find another server to play on.
As much as starting over sucks, at the end of the day it's not worth keeping yourself in an environment that is poison to you.
And for future advice, people who behave this way pray on those who respond. If there's something you reasonably need to say (that isn't just being toxic yourself), say it and leave it. Elaborating and continuing to argue with them will just fuel them. Deny them their platform and they'll get bored of you.
"Bro, you need to bring an industrial tractor. I'm a fatty. Oh, and a normal prison won't do, you'll need to find me a free spot at the local zoo."
Play it up.
QFT. I also enjoy the CSGO forums. Some of the derps in there are hilarious.
I do agree with the first bit. Leaving a toxic environment is always the right call.
As for the rest, however...
The actions of the other is always ultimately their own responsibility, but...
Say that someone engages in the same sort of toxic behaviour they ultimately get victimised by, except they are a bit too good at it.
Say that they don't know when to stop, and can't or won't try to deescalate when others have had thoroughly enough of them.
Say that they can't read the room, and a result, they inadvertently turn entire communities against themselves in the process of getting a rise out of a few people.
Now, I'm not saying this necessarily is the case, but that it definitely could be. By his own admission, this has happened to him several times. Can't you say that they're culpable to some degree, however much ignorance or social ineptitude underpins it?
I know, benefit of a doubt and all that, but still... Isn't there a space for nuance even in these sorts of scenarios?