Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Right, so they should have named it "Generic City Manager 26: Frozen Wasteland Edition", but not Frost Punk 2.
The video at the front refers to the genre as societal survival game.
We want Frostpunk 2, which extends Frostpunk 1 with new mechanics, while being true to the award winning, loved Frostpunk.
If they want to make a completely new game with only the story of previous one - don't call it Frostpunk 2. Call it Something Else: Frostpunk or whatever.
FP2 is a completely different game. And that is sad.
Who are We?
From what I have seen so far, this feels less like the first, and more like a generic city building game. Think city skylines is more like it because while it can let you place some special buildings down, otherwise everything else is auto made in zones/districts.
Had thought it would've gone with the 1st gameplay and moved the survival theme to a sort of basic survival (obviously still gotta worry about the cold, but not THE cold) but with a heavier lean towards politics. Since once people realize "oh hey, we aren't gonna die tomorrow...so who we gonna vote for?".
The rest was a puzzle survival building game with great narrative.
Plus most mechanics of FP1 are in FP2 and in fact this is a problem for some mechanics not scaling well.