Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2828021726
However, once you reach end-game content (NG+), the scaling of perk activation chances is a game-changer indeed. In return, you could argue that all perks that have a low or medium chance to activate are pointless, unless you can reach decent luck stats.
As for the choice of talismans, do not prioretize stats here. Go with the ones that have active skills that suit your playstyle. E.g. a free reset of your runic cooldowns can be much more enjoyable than some passive effects.
Yes, it is absolutely worth it.
In fact my biggiest gripe in Niflheim was balancing charms that prioritize resistance to the poison mist and luck stats for better rewards