Can we document users specs and performance here?

[DEMANATI]

Like, ppl that play the game say their specs and how well it runs to see what's the lowest specs we can get away with in this game
*Common issues mentioned in replies*
- people are having trouble with index controls
-Physics seem off(could be related to frame rate idk)
-some people with high specs(20-30 series cards and i7+ processors) can't reach a high steady frame rate of 100+ depending on the settings
-airlink reprojecting
-some are having issues getting past the loading screen or long loading screens

[-tobi- 🂱]

i5-9600k, RTX 2080, 16gb RAM, Oculus CV1 with 3 Sensors runs stable on high settings

[MoltenBaguette]

i5-12400f, 3060ti, SSD, Running on high with htc vive, no fps drops

[Cigarrette_Man]

i7-7700HQ and a 1060.

32GB of ram.

Thx, MSI

[Are you Joshin' me?]

Escrito originalmente por StarryEyes:

I'm getting a smooth framerate just the physics seem...i dk, off somehow. maybe its just the game.

The physics are definitely curbed for now at least. The weight stats are skewed and feels like the physics are running at a lower fps than the game

[Slice*>]

ryzen 7 5800X, RTX 2070S, 32gb ram, valve index, can't get stable 80 fps on medium, a lot reprojection

[Elizorg]

htc vive
Nvidia RTX 3060ti, Intel i7-11700 (not overclocked), 32GB RAM.
all good on "ultra" graphics but as soon as I try to set everything on ultra in custom settings, Im noticing fps drops

[Aragao]

Ryzen 5600x, GTX 1060 6gb OC, 16 GB RAM 3200mhz
Quest 2 Res 2000x2140~ per eye
low settings
played a bit with 72 Hz, MSI after burner registered around 55% GPU usage only.
4000 Mb memory usage with peak around 5000 mb
CPU was around 10 to 20%
RAM usage 10 to 11,5 gb
overall I got a really good feeling about how it ran, maybe even better than boneworks, BUT some settings hits REALLY hard the performance, I recommend testing and making your own customs settings

[Moosey789]

5700X / RTX 3070 / 32GB RAM, Quest 2, Virtual Desktop "High", 90hz Streaming Setting. I can maintain stable 90fps if I go 0.8 resolution scale with 4x MSAA and low HBAO. OR I can play stable 90fps if I turn off HBAO and go 2x MSAA at 100% resolution scale. I also lowered volumetrics to low. Shadows medium. Cascade 2. LOD 1.5. Screen space reflections low. Looks good. Boosted sharpening in VD to offset 0.8 scale, but keeping the HBAO and SSR definitely makes it look nice. If you prefer sharpness just turn off those features and keep the internal res up.

I'd be curious to hear if anyone has better experience with AirLink/Link.

[MRkingbacca]

Pimax 5K Super
Ryzen 7 3800X / 32GB 3600MHZ RAM / RX 6750XT / 1TB Samsung 980 SSD/
game won't go past loading screen.

[Rune]

Just finished Boneworks, could use res 500% and 2xMSAA, all other settings maxed, still got solid 90 fps.

With Bonelab kinda feels like my oc'ed RTX 3090 is the bare minimum for acceptable image quality, lol.

Devs stated that system requirements were similar for Boneworks and Bonelab, must be joke of the century :-)

Looks like low-poly Quest assets, with way too super-duper-polished surfaces.

Btw, normal light from fixed lamps is fake, when I put my hand under a lamp, the light does not illuminate my hand and there is no shadow cast by my hand - just like the fake Questified light in Red Matter 2. But when you hold a torch, you do get some proper light and nice dynamic shadows.

I'm using SteamVR res 200% and res 1.2 in-game (might equal res 240%). I get solid 90 fps for now with these settings:

MSAAx1
SMAA = disabled (does not look better activated)
HBAO = low (does not look better using higher settings)
Shadow res on Ultra
Shadow cascade = 4
Volumetric on High
Screen space refections = med
Bloom = high
Lod bias 3.0

If prefer high res to high msaa, high res clears up the image quality and provides antialiasing, while high MSAA removes jaggies but not the blur from low res. So push res as high as possible, and lower msaa as much as possible. 2c.

[Zod]

hmm, given this also runs on a quest2, maybe the low setting should use quest assets or some equivalent.

[Rune]

I bet a RTX 4090 can't do 90 fps in this game with all in-game settings on Ultra or maxed.

Strange that such a demanding game comes with no support for DLSS.

[Aragao]

testing around a bit, found out SSR and HBAO are the most demanding by far, more than halves frames. will be running SSR off because low looks worse than off sometimes, and HBAO low bc its not that different on visuals comparing with med and high, and it saves a lot of frames.
And yeah as Rune said, SMAA and MSAA are better off or in the lowest settings so you could bump up the resolution

[A Random Canadian]

Radeon RX 6600, i7-3770, 16GB RAM, and a SAMSUNG HMD Odyssey+, runs well on medium.

[DEMANATI]

thank you all for your participation