The Ranchers

The Ranchers

View Stats:
20 and 30 min reviews
What's with the negative reviews after 20 mins. I have bought it but am busy so will play tomorrow. Not sure 20 mins is enough time to rant and hate on a game.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 38 comments
I don't know man, did you try reading the what the negative reviews posted under the review? They give a little section on why they didn't like the game.
Originally posted by Luci:
I don't know man, did you try reading the what the negative reviews posted under the review? They give a little section on why they didn't like the game.
It's bonkers i can't wait to try it tomorrow to see what these 20 mins reviews are about.
Misleading us on the multiplayer being one. Thats the biggest thing for anyone, most like the coop play, same world etc and thats how they tried selling it and its separate world, youd get better out of a £5 shop sim game
Originally posted by Just2Ep1c:
Misleading us on the multiplayer being one. Thats the biggest thing for anyone, most like the coop play, same world etc and thats how they tried selling it and its separate world, youd get better out of a £5 shop sim game
Not tried it yet just seems very bizarre that most reviews are under 1 hour.
You first time bought game on steam or what? :lunar2019crylaughingpig:
Originally posted by Boris:
Originally posted by Just2Ep1c:
Misleading us on the multiplayer being one. Thats the biggest thing for anyone, most like the coop play, same world etc and thats how they tried selling it and its separate world, youd get better out of a £5 shop sim game
Not tried it yet just seems very bizarre that most reviews are under 1 hour.
some expected a full on multiplayer and now are butthurt its not (possible not yet) those take are to an degree just stupid and entitled.

Now those mentioning bugs like seemingly being unable to create a account (which is somehwat of questionable thign to beginn with) are more reasonable.
Originally posted by Yuuki:
Originally posted by Boris:
Not tried it yet just seems very bizarre that most reviews are under 1 hour.
some expected a full on multiplayer and now are butthurt its not (possible not yet) those take are to an degree just stupid and entitled.

Now those mentioning bugs like seemingly being unable to create a account (which is somehwat of questionable thign to beginn with) are more reasonable.

What are you going on about? The game states you can play with your friends. If I bought the game wanting to play with a friend and and it didn't share progression while in the same world I would be mad too.
A lot of them are because of how the game controls and honestly, I think that's a fair assessment (if the game controls are too awkward to have fun it is going to impair your enjoyment of the game). Or things ike I gave it a negative for requiring online for single player. Which is total bs and ddeserves an instant bad review.
Originally posted by Luci:
Originally posted by Yuuki:
some expected a full on multiplayer and now are butthurt its not (possible not yet) those take are to an degree just stupid and entitled.

Now those mentioning bugs like seemingly being unable to create a account (which is somehwat of questionable thign to beginn with) are more reasonable.

What are you going on about? The game states you can play with your friends. If I bought the game wanting to play with a friend and and it didn't share progression while in the same world I would be mad too.
sadly not sharing progression isnt all that new if play other early accsess games even in straight up open world survival games. Its nothing new thats what i am on about.

Heck even Core keeper didnt had shared progression for a while in EA if i remember right.
I think a lot of people expect an extremely polished game because of how long its been. Which I understand. Though, people don't understand how hard it is to keep a project funded, have a team stay on track, and meet everyone's needs. Building a game isn't black and white. There is experienced people and then are some who are working their first project. I try to go into playing these games with patience and understanding. Many people just pick apart because they "waited a long time". If its not your cup of tea, don't play it. If its not what you expected, let the developer know. Though, to play a game for less than an hour and just completely have your mind made up....is rough. It's a blessing and a curse with reviews. Sometimes you just have to bite the bullet and adjust to the players. That is what makes or breaks a game, by how they react with it.
A steady online connection and crashing servers. You don't need 10 hours to dislike this. :lunar2020thinkingtiger:
Originally posted by Random009:
You first time bought game on steam or what? :lunar2019crylaughingpig:
Sorry I don't know what your on about.😁
The game as solo/singleplayer is fine and i like it. Most of my gripe is the online coop. It was marketed to be played with friends... Yeah it is but somehow you can only join to "help" rather than having the same progression or even unlocking the same thing.

I know some games does that but man.. just a little disappointed since I've been looking forward to more diverse coop experience

Still holding on to the game since the dev said "they're looking into the shared progression issue" idk what that means but hopefully its a good news
Can someone give me the lowdown on how the multiplayer works then? Is it like you can't build or buy things being the issue?

What can the other player do in the world? And what can't they do?
Once again, the issue with multiplayer shared progression is a bug that was not in previous versions of the game and is already being worked on for a hotfix.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 38 comments
Per page: 1530 50