Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I love this engine
Poof, unwishlisted and call me when it hits 80% off. Already waited 20 years.
Some of the wargames RTS have 10vs10
2vs2 is way too less, imagine if 1 player quits, the game is over
multiplayer is a let down
Why release a game on an engine not made for RTS? To show off graphical capabilities? RTS doesn't have to be amazing, with RT and other bells and whistles. It has to support large maps, many units and many players. Can't anyone make a decent RTS anymore?
Is this true? I thought the pre-release materials said this was "as close to as unlimited" as your PC could get, just like the old RA?
That's disappointing was about to get 5 copies but now i'll pass if it's only 2 v 2.