Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Maybe wait till we get to see how building tech trees look like, what the naval and avaiation combat is (i mean so far we have apache, hercules and some jet on GDI side but not a blip on NOD obviously proper RA II Kirhoff would be welcome, the mammoth of the sky).
hell i have not yet even gotten my hands of heavier units like APC on Dynasty side (yes i drop the analogy and using proper names now),
ideal aim is to have rock paper scissors stuff betwen the factions Lighter faster toop on dynasty, maybe mssive overspecialisation on the other side (emulating the utility for every situation style NATO uses) where as third would go for middle of the road - heavy emphasis on APCs as midway between cars and tanks, adaptability through manouves rather than just deploying dozens of completly differing vehiles i dunno.