Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
doesn't change the fact it's still an incomplete game
So was Mass Effect 1 "incomplete" because it was first announced as a trilogy and 2 & 3 weren't out yet? Is The Last of Us Part 1 "incomplete" because The Last of Us Part 2 exists?
Oh... Oh I'm so sorry.
why do you have to spoil the fun >.< xD
Nor do I think the price point some people have to pay is fair either, but I got it on Epic for 30 bucks when it first came to pc, so. No reason at all to buy it a third time.
If they used any sort of standard naming scheme like they did with XIII or something, these topics wouldn't keep coming up. The game title is misleading.