Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
For example Subnautica on PS4 is 14GB while on PS5 it is 5GB. Control: Ultimate Edition on Xbox Series X/PC is 42.5GB but on the PS5 it is 25.79GB.
In addition to the high compression ratio of this tech it also has extremely powerful decompression capabilities meaning there is essentially no reason for things like video or audio to be decompressed in storage so bulky video and audio which commonly ate up tons of space historically in games will not be an issue here as it often isn't on PS5 in general.
I agree. It is extremely difficult to gauge the extent of the overworld / open area exploration based on the trailers or the visual changes (esp with Square Enix' atrocious behavior of nearly always uploading low quality videos for their trailers like this one).
What is interesting is the open wilderness areas likely take up a significant chunk of the game's overall physical volume to explore but such areas, which seems true in the trailer so far, tend to repeatedly use much the same assets for obvious reasons. Despite this the game is going to use two blu-ray discs and likely not for license protection reasons in this case which suggests the locales (cities/towns notably) we visit may be bulkier than I was expecting as they're more likely to use numerous assets compared to the wilderness, much like Remake's Midgar had a rich variety of assets.
One thing I hope for is they have strong enemy diversity in Rebirth which the Midgar section in the original game and remake episode 1 didn't particularly have.
I am thinking about grabbing FFXVI for PS5. Should I buy the physical or digital copy? I have only played two digital PS4 games on my family's PS5 and we have no physical games on it, so not really sure how physical discs with the console.
Think there is any difference on load times or anything significant? Does the physical copy wind up using a lot of storage space or just minimal for like save data and updates? I wonder how the sound (of the disc being read) will be? If I use the PS5, it is usually in the dead of night with the volume low. So, that actually is a consideration for me, hah!
If you don't mind taking the time to answer, I would appreciate your insight.
I don't own a PS5, personally, so one thing I don't know for sure and worth considering in your case is whether the verification check of a physical disc when playing makes much noise. It might not since it isn't reading much due to being just a verification check but I can't guarantee how they set it up with regards to that. Overall, if you can get the digital version unless there is something collector specific from a physical edition you really want I would just go for the digital copy now days, even for sake of backing up since often they don't even have game data on the disc, like the CoD example, and require it to be downloaded anyways so it is even gradually (some games do this some do not) losing its purpose as a means of archiving old games. As for loading, it will be the same regardless since it wont pull data for actual play from the disc in either physical or digital copies as it will run off the installed data, instead. I haven't looked into the Xbox for this purpose but I imagine it is much the same since it also has potent I/O capabilities and there is little reason to run off the disc now days, especially as disc reading even compared to the slower Xbox Series X is substantially slower than its internal storage.
Its probably the most common question on the internet when it comes to this series.
1st off I will say, no. You don't have to play OG to enjoy Remake or Rebirth.
However, if you do play OG FF7 you will appreciate the amount of detail put into the characters, the music, and many other aspects that made the original game great. Not necessarily nostalgia induced slices of joy, but what people might call easter eggs for this game.
I personally think they struck gold with Remake. Remakes and remasters of games don't really get this kind of attention or take a 6 hour piece of a game and turn it into 40 hours. I have a friend that has never played the original. And he kept asking me questions about "how they could create a 40 hour game out of the first few hours of the original? It seems to seamless."
When I played it it felt dragged in a few places like the side quests and as the game ages and you play it more than once, the game starts to show its age in some areas. But watching him play for the first time reminded me of my first time playing it. And I was blown away.
I was on cloud 9.
I think you might miss out on some fun stuff if you didn't play the original. But I think a lot of this pure joy I felt comes from playing this game back in 1997. They totally exceeded expectations.
That said, yes, it does feel baffling that people are asking whether they would need to play part 1 of the remake in order to understand what's going on in part 2.
Square told us we would never get a remake and they are correct the word remake in the title is a play on words due to Sephiroth remaking the timeline. There is a lot going on and yeah even Dirge of Cerberus playing that gives you an idea of some of what is happening.