Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Unless you want to play with online a friend, in that case Sacrifice would be the best choice since the first one only has couch co-op and no online.
From 5 hours into sacrifice it feels like a downgrade and has made several stupid design decisions that seem common in this genre for sequels. No proper interconnected world, having to go back to a central location to level up (at least you don't to talk to a boring npc who repeats the same few lines.) I'm hoping its more a dark souls 3 situation where a bad first impression leads to a great mid/late game but its too early for me to tell.
Coding a few "arena" like rooms in vertical levels where bosses would make their stand would have been way better.
Thick atmosphere. You can actually smell the mist and rain the art direction is that well done.
Sacrifice also lacks the dark, bloody and raw aesthetic of the original game.
That said, Sacrifice isn't a bad game. It's like Elden Ring vs. Bloodborne.