Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The part that is factually untrue.
Rome did not have same sex marriages. Sex between men was certainly prevalent, but to say they were married is inconsistent with the historical record.
Yes, men in ancient Rome married other men, including emperors. However, the idea of same-sex marriage as we know it today was not common.
Evidence
Emperor Nero: Married at least two men, including Sporus, who was castrated and treated as a wife
Emperor Elagabalus: Reportedly married his male partner Hierocles in the early 3rd century AD
Cicero: Insulted Mark Antony for being promiscuous in his youth, including a marriage to Curio
Hadrian: Had a relationship with Antinous, which was immortalized in Marguerite Yourcenar's Memoirs of Hadrian
Trajan: Known for his fondness for boys
Please do your research!
Please improve your functional reading comprehension.
A gaggle of emperors calling their boy-toys “wife” does not equate to Romans having marriage defined for same sex couples.
Learn how to do actual research.
Even with proof you still denied the truth, is it because you cant handle the fact one of the most powerful empires in human history didnt care about who they loved or ♥♥♥♥♥♥. You sound upset and homophobic only a hater would come on here and argue about me asking if there is MM in a game.
Not only that, he also failed to cite. Stating something is true isn't evidence. Sylow is correct. Commoners weren't allowed to have same-sex relationships as they rarely had subordinates.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7045212/
Regardless of this being true, Slaves of Rome places you as someone of high esteem and means, thus allowing the ownership of many slaves and a large place to keep them. :) Happy ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥!
Unrelated - I hope it's ok to ask from everyone - we are trying to improve reviews very badly (plus, good review gives us the option to grow and develop more fast) so if it's possible to ask to leave (an honest) review would be amazing <3