Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It might sound strange, but we don’t have any intentions of developing this game for another decade.
So what is the core of Militsioner? It's an immersive-sim about a relationship with the Law. So at that time, actively in development were: an open dialogue system with voice input, a tamagotchi-like mood system for all npc’s, a dynamic time system and a law system.
We had to abandon the voice recognition system. it was inevitable that some features we had initially aimed for would be cut. It’s natural for every project. While such decisions are typically made behind closed doors in most studios, our commitment to open development means that you get to witness it in real time. But we feel like it's crucial to maintain transparency with you about these unavoidable decisions.
To pull that off, you gotta figure out his routine. The LAW needs to sleep too. Time is a key element, everything in the game world operates on its schedule.
It's very important for us that the player experiments and finds their own way to solve each task. But such an approach is very labor-intensive. Typically, in games like Dishonored, each path is crafted separately and represents a complete segment of the game that the player will never see unless they choose that specific route. We can’t afford such expenses. How to maintain freedom without adding years to the game's development?
It's up to the player to decide how to get through. Each door may look the same but offers entirely different solutions depending on whether the player has a lockpick, is on good terms with an NPC who can provide a key, or if the player has swiped it from that NPC. Or even wait for the night time and discreetly break the lock with a brick.
One of the recurring issues was that people were avoiding the game's mechanics all together. Players struggled to grasp what they needed to do in the game at all, leaning towards tactics they had already seen in other games. They were playing someone else's game.
After spending several months testing and making fixes, we found ourselves with a demo that felt completely different – more like a real game. We significantly changed the overall loop, tossed in heaps of new content, characters, and details to spice up the game.
Hey, this is nowhere near the final cut of the game. The tamagotchi thing still needs some tinkering, the dialogue system is on a quest for a new direction and, honestly, the game's a bit of a walk in the park right now. It's tough to be super objective – our eyes are a bit foggy, but overall, we received very positive feedback. The demo has bloomed into something way bigger than our original plan for these two years, even with the inevitable cuts. Most importantly – we've figured out where to steer this ship next.
Loading
