Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
well said and conclusive, should lock the thread with this statement.
when the developers confess a single cheat hidden in the game.
More than a bit of nudity, the true heritage of Larry is ridiculous cheating secrets.
If you do not want players to get a wrong idea, license a different game, not a Larry Game. Nobody is asking for an adult movie with explicit sex-scenes, people are asking for original games kind of content, to be true to the franchise.
Please, do not change the sense of the words, like a sjw would do. This is not even an approach, is just using Larry name to sell a different game, with other words, a kind of scam. You can clarify it here, but you know not everyone read the forums, and not everyone use steam. If you can get some money from people with the wrong expectations, It's ok for you right? Making this thread is not enough; you should advertise this at covers, art and promo. But is better to say ey, we already said it! Your fault if you did not read this.
People do not care about your vision, opinions and political views. People care about the game they are going to buy and play, is not our fault that you want to change a "spicy and funny" game to a different game that fits your political ideology.
You can delete my post or ban me, I do not care, but you cannot say I am posting this everywhere, because I am not, in fact I am not even going to follow this. I do not need you to educate me or show me your visions, I needed you do make new Larry games, not a game with detailed sex scenes or this thing.
We both know this thread is just to cover your backs, and I do not have any sympathy for your company, however, we are at the middle of a pandemic, so I wish you safety. Maybe someday you will learn that gaming is just for fun, different types and genres are welcome, and there was nothing wrong with the original approach of Larry games and no reason to take the ip to make something different.
-cheers.
I think it's wrong to say it's no Larry Game because it lacks sexual content, because it's full of sexual content, we can see Larry nude ass too.
For me it is even too much sexual content, because Larry is more about humor. He's a looser trying hard to get in touch with women. It's about humor and the sexual content is the vessel to carry that humor. But in this Larry the humor is often overwhelmed by just plain sexual content. I guess we are not twelfe years old and Larry is not famous for a beavis and butthead styled humor, like "look penis - haha"...
I also found it disturbing that Larry is having succesful sex with a lot of women, this is simply not Larry style, ok, you can develop Larry, but it's no fun.
I missed the sex scenes, there are mostly blackscreens. I don't miss pictures of a naked Larry and some girls there, but I miss the reward for my progress in the game and the developers missed a great chance to place some, let's say classy, humor about sex.
And there's also the possibility to pixel every delicate part of everything, like the classics did, I guess that would be ok for the most of us, because it's not about explicit nudity, it's about humor.
My point was NOT, that there's no sexual content in the game. My point is that there's a f******g overwhelming sexual content in the game, including even nudity (no boobs of course), but we have developers, which claim that there's no nudity in the game because of their own ethic decision.
We have developers who claim to the fanbase that there's of course nudity in the game and for the rest of the world there's a topic (yes this one) where they claim that there's no nudity in the game.
They want to do it right for everyone and that's what I call double standards or a lie.
That's the point that pisses me off.
If you use humor in general and humor about sexuality in this paticullar case you can't do it right for everyone. It's a controversal field. And if you develop a Larry adventure you will have thought about this...
You cannot say nudity is bad and sell Larry games on the other hand, maybe you should have done a Kings Quest sequel or something instead.
What would have happened if Monty Phyton and South Park would have tried to do it right for everyone? The Simpsons for example tried to milden their humor and that were the worst seasons of all times.
Maybe think about that? And don't forget, you (dear developers) have chosen Larry to work on....
For me your answers are showing that my accusations are true and for my it's a failure to open that topic, seriously WHY???
To tell the world that you are not behind the original idea of the Larry series, or what?
And for me it's legit to say we show no boobs, because we are forced to do so, but this, sorry again dear developers, leaves a real bad taste in my mouth. Especially after you claimed that "there is quite some nudity in there, just imagine the paintings in the hotel lobby" after you posted in the opener "but to make a Larry game with nudity, that is not our Larry title, sorry." And by the way, Larry is NOT your invention, it's Al Lowes one and in my opinion you have to pay respect for that, nobody forced you to make a sequel (I hope).
And one last thought, I found that idea with the DLC great, maybe you can make everybody happy with it. But after there's no censorship in this game, just a lack of some content, maybe it's hard create a proper DLC.
It's not about the nudity or your decision to limit it here. It's about the focus on consoles and fairness to console owners with a franchise that is historically been PC only. You're choosing to let consoles and censorship dictate your vision for the game. You might say it's not compromised and you wanted it this way, but what are you supposed to say? You kind of have to say that whether it's true or not.
The fact is when you want to be on consoles you're already put a leash on yourself that's going to prevent you from doing things. Everything you can do now in regards to the comedy has changed because of this decision.
And what is this fairness crap? Life isn't fair. Gaming isn't fair. No one wants a censored game, but that's a console issue, and not something that PC deals with. Don't like it? Then don't game on console.
I mean, should developers restrict the PC platform because of consoles? Should we have visual parity across all platforms because it would be unfair to console owners? They pay the same price, so it would be unfair for PC gamers to have exclusive settings, enhanced visuals, etc (that sometimes make it seem like a generational leap), right?
Honestly it was a big mistake to even bring up consoles, because I don't think many people are going to respect that stance at all. All people are gonna see is that you're focused on fairness to consoles, so the game is probably limited by that, and they'll just immediately disregard it.
It's not like people couldn't come to PC to play this game if they wanted, since any potato can run this game. I'd bet you a lot of money that even console players would rather just play this on PC instead of having a watered down game just so it could release on consoles.
Again, this isn't about lack of nudity or anything with that. It's the fact that you openly come out and say you've put a leash on yourselves for console fairness.
It was decent. I don't think the love angle you had with Faith worked out well, but I don't have any major problems with the game.
As for Larry, the humor, the puzzles, the music and the jokes is what made Larry.
Nudity never dominated the game. The game was just as fun without seeing a simple niple.
I can only respect what you guys done so far, so THANK YOU again!
......
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2310813721
...well.. yeah... their choice.. :/...
''Sigh''... I miss the 90s...
You spend a lot of time talking about "your Larry" and "your vision" but what about the fans. This is a long running series, or at least it was, and I for one would rather see it go down in flames then see what you did to the ending of this game! It's ridiculous and ENTIRELY NOT LARRY.
I haven't yet played your sequel but did just wrap up WDDD. First as someone who played all of the LSL games during my youth, I really appreciate you guys picking up the torch and making a fun adventure game with WDDD. While Al Lowe wasn't involved in the development, I think you guys did a pretty good job carrying on the legacy with a good story line and reminiscent game play of LSL1, traveling around Lost Wages and trying to get the various gals with a nice up to date spin on things. Given what happened to Adventure Gaming and companies like Sierra and Lucas Arts, I truly appreciate a company that can pick up the IP and build a quality game with a good story line.
While I purchased WDDD when it was announced, I just now finally got around to playing and completing it. I'll likely pick up WDDT in the not to distant future.
I did want to chime in on the choice for lack of nudity. I am like many of the other fans and do believe that nudity in the LSL games should be there. I get the reason given is do to the rating systems on console games; however, I don't think that should be a real factor. If I recall correctly going back to the original LSL games, you could unlock dirtier versions of the game by successfully answering the pre-game adult questions. If you didn't answer them correctly and played the game, they had the censor bar over the naughty bits; however, if all questions were answered their was no bar. It's not like you could see much in those early CGA/EGA days, but it was a good means to allow "nudity" and likely did not require that much additional code. If something like that could be written in for the PC version, while having the console versions always cencored by default, I think you might make a happy compromise with your die hard fans while still being able to sell to the console market without as much risk. If your console gamers want an uncensored version, let them pick it up on the PC.
Again, I really appreciate you guys picking up the LSL IP and making a really good adventure game in WDDD and I look forward to playing WDDT in the future. Wish we could see some other classic sequels like Space Quest come out, or even a new Monkey Island (but I doubt Disney will ever let that IP go even though they'll never do anything with it).
Best of luck with your future endeavors and thank you for keeping the adventure gaming spirit alive and well.
thank you for your passion and dedication, as well as kind words and feedback.
@wickid187
As you have enjoyed LSL WDDD, you should definitely give WDDT a try ;)
-cheers
Admittedly, I've only played Magna ♥♥♥ Lauda. But I loved that game. It wasn't afraid to have sex and nudity and raunchy jokes. I was too young to have purchased the previous games in the series. And its clear that the later games have been purchased by a group who isn't staying true to its past. So, I will be avoiding the series until someone comes along that will be true to the heritage of LSL.
No offense, but Magna ♥♥♥ Laude isn't really staying true to it's past games. It was even despised by LSL's creator (Al Lowe) himself because it missed the entire point of the LSL games. These new games maybe miss the mark of staying true to the old games in a few ways, sure. But they definitely have more in common with the heritage of the series than Magna ♥♥♥ Laude and Box Office Bust have had.
Admittedly I like Magna ♥♥♥ Laude for other reasons, but when comparing it to the old LSL games, misses its mark by a whole mile and a half.