Add multiplayer

[Catas]

Add multiplayer you have enough money now, make the game complete and make more money.

[Knight0vvl]

Originally posted by Froggyluv:

Originally posted by Knight0vvl:

idk why people are saying no, you can have a single player game with a multi player option. tthis isnt cod it could easily have an MP that people who want to do it can enjoy.

MP is not just "Easily" implemented. Have you ever done any game design at the engine level - we're talking about a solo dev who just released his Early access version and will now have a mountain of work to both implement the rest of intended features, calibrate the broken ones and then some. Asking for "oh you're rich just hire a new MP dev team and put it in" is naive to say the least

if youre gonna respond get get all enraged make sure you read what i said. i said the game could easily have a MP that would be enjoyable for those who want it meaning just because itst Mp doesnt mean you have to play it that way. Never once did i say MP can easily be added to the game....

[D0m3x]

No

[EJR]

I don't understand why people are saying no. I personally believe having a co-op game in Manor Lords would be fun, playing with a few friends on a map while trying to see who can become the top dog of the region sounds like a fun game mode for the game.

Will it be intense? No, but Manor Lords is the perfect game to have a chill multiplayer round with 2-3 friends.

[Froggyluv]

Originally posted by Knight0vvl:

Originally posted by Froggyluv:

MP is not just "Easily" implemented. Have you ever done any game design at the engine level - we're talking about a solo dev who just released his Early access version and will now have a mountain of work to both implement the rest of intended features, calibrate the broken ones and then some. Asking for "oh you're rich just hire a new MP dev team and put it in" is naive to say the least

if youre gonna respond get get all enraged make sure you read what i said. i said the game could easily have a MP that would be enjoyable for those who want it meaning just because itst Mp doesnt mean you have to play it that way. Never once did i say MP can easily be added to the game....

Not sure where your seeing "Rage" but ok.

"this isnt cod it could easily have an MP that people who want to do it can enjoy."

I see "easily have an MP" -not sure what semantics you're going for here but it would be a major operation especially at this point. If you read the OP -you can see the poster has no clue had hard it would be to implement especially at this state

[Torosaur]

yes coop

[Watergun]

Originally posted by DeLastOne:

Originally posted by Watergun:

Dear Greg, no. It is going to open up a can of worms. Then you will be spending most of your time and efforts dealing with network securities, and cheaters. ROI is going to be drastically low.

Trust me, I used to be very into multiplayer games more than 20 years back, but as my buddies gotten married, started to have kids, it is really challenging to have group play anymore. Playing with random players are never enjoyable for me.

Why do you think MP is forcibly competitive. It is all about Co-Op. And if it was a versus mode why do you think it is about a competitive ladder ? could still be P2P. So who care about cheaters... You seems to have been stuck 20 years ago

Used to play both competitively (i.e. Starcraft, Starcraft 2, Warcraft 3) and then co-op multiplayer-tively (i.e. Dota2, WoW, Lineage2) with friends. After that, friends all have their own schedule, own priorities. Single player, PvE games than become more fun. And no, coop with strangers is not fun at all, especially with cheaters or suspected cheaters.

[DisabledSailor]

Originally posted by meraco:

Originally posted by Toxiqity:

people are say no to multiplayer out right which makes no since.

I am not saying no to multiplayer.

I am saying it's not going to happen anyway.

So all this back and forth is a waste of time.

that is just an out right lie. are you a dev? do you know the dev? he already said he is looking into it. so i dont know where you got your info from but you are spreading false info.

[DisabledSailor]

Originally posted by Sensimillian:

Multiplayer always ruins good single player games. Get outta here with that crap.

well thx god you could still play single playing when they had multiplayer, so your argument is flawed

[DisabledSailor]

Originally posted by Froggyluv:

Originally posted by Knight0vvl:

idk why people are saying no, you can have a single player game with a multi player option. tthis isnt cod it could easily have an MP that people who want to do it can enjoy.

MP is not just "Easily" implemented. Have you ever done any game design at the engine level - we're talking about a solo dev who just released his Early access version and will now have a mountain of work to both implement the rest of intended features, calibrate the broken ones and then some. Asking for "oh you're rich just hire a new MP dev team and put it in" is naive to say the least

no one is saying stop what you are doing and add multiplayer, i think everyone agrees finish the game first.

[381]

this game needs first basics things and finish single player expierence then worry about coop. i don't want half bake bread to eat

[EJR]

Originally posted by Watergun:

Used to play both competitively (i.e. Starcraft, Starcraft 2, Warcraft 3) and then co-op multiplayer-tively (i.e. Dota2, WoW, Lineage2) with friends. After that, friends all have their own schedule, own priorities. Single player, PvE games than become more fun. And no, coop with strangers is not fun at all, especially with cheaters or suspected cheaters.

Just because a city building game adds MP doesn't mean you need to play it to get the best experience. This isn't a AAA game where the company will be going all in and focusing its resources on new maps, mechanics, skins, battle pass, etc, a city building game will just have the option to play co-op with some friends or randoms if you really wanted to. If Manor Lords gets MP then all content available to it will be available in SP and vice versa, Manor Lords won't be losing much if the dev decides to dedicate one future update to adding MP to the game.

[sunbeen]

Only co-op is fine

[Froggyluv]

Originally posted by Toxiqity:

Originally posted by Froggyluv:

MP is not just "Easily" implemented. Have you ever done any game design at the engine level - we're talking about a solo dev who just released his Early access version and will now have a mountain of work to both implement the rest of intended features, calibrate the broken ones and then some. Asking for "oh you're rich just hire a new MP dev team and put it in" is naive to say the least

no one is saying stop what you are doing and add multiplayer, i think everyone agrees finish the game first.

You might not be saying that but thats exactly how the OP comes across. Theres no "hey nice game ,take your time and after you're done with SP - consider MP".

Now read their version.

[NinjaBeest]

Add multiplayer. Absolutely do not understand the people who are in favor of singleplayer only saying no in request for multiplayer threads.

It does not hurt you singleplayer only guys at all if the dev was to integrate multiplayer for those who want it. This might be news to you, but you can just keep playing singleplayer and those who want multiplayer will be in separate games entirely playing multiplayer with their friends and spouses.

Stop ruining opportunity for other people who want to enjoy a really great game and have a great time along with their friends at the same time in the same game. No need to do so!

[Crewmember 123]

I like that someone who doesnt own the game cries for multiplayer. probably someone that enjoys the pirated version so far.