Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah, I know such a painting about the destruction of Troy, completely wrong armor.
Sadly, in our "modern times" it's modern to "demand or cancel", that's the crazyness.
it is not modern, humanity has always done it and will always do it by virtue of the fact that the same historical episode reread over the centuries changes in value or interpretation depending on the culture of those who read it. history has never been objective.
humanity has been erasing or changing things since at least writing existed and probably even before even if we have no evidence of it.
Be that as it may, it just got louder with interwebs, social media, etc.
Historically, 90% of our villagers would live in shacks. I dont agree with OP's suggestion but your question can be said to the current game so I dont think its a good reasoning. Currently the game acts as if every peasant families in the game is rich as hell.
The developper tries to make a game with some amount of historical accuracy, even having historic consultants to help with this. The setting of the game is not generic. If you don't want to play a game set in medieval Europe because you are somehow opposed to historic specifics (like that the religion is explicitly catholic), then you should probably rather play something like "Banished", which, if I recall correctly, has no specific historical background.
Wanting for stuff that were major parts of a certain historical period be depicted in a game which has that historic period as it's theme is not anti-woke. It's just about wanting the game to be true to it's theme. And the historic background really is integral to the game. It's even so specific that it can be pinned down to the 15th century Franconia, given the architecture of the buildings and the clothing of the citizens.
Of couese it's just a game, but I personally would be rather disappointed if the game abandonned it's specific setting. (In the same way in which I would not want for the city builder "Paharo" to include temples for generic or fantasy deities rather than the actual Egyptians gods.)
No, the buildings are quite accurate and a result of the developper working wit historic consultants. Peasants in the 15th century did not live in shacks. Maybe some did, but not the majority and shurely not 90 %.
Islam did not want to do anything. Some muslim leaders wanted to expand their territory, and sometimes also wanted to expand their religion at the same time. That's not too dissimilar from how christian leaders expanded their territories and religion. (For example Charlemagne in the saxon wars or the teutonic order in the baltic region.)
you're probably partg of the tiny minority that wants black people (african americans didn't exist in 1403, so sorry to use the correct term) in KCD, right ?
because "better rewrite history" instead of being "open" like you narrow-minded people claim you are.
If I was the dev, I'd shut down any nonsense-thread like this immediatly :D