Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No third person, game was built around first person. You see your character in cutscenes, inventory screens, and some animations like climbing.
Not really, you can make a mode that switches between first and 3rd person like Oblivion.
All 3rd person view does is moves the perspective of the camera from inside the avatar to outside of it. Everything the character does outside the character will appear the same as it does from the inside. (AKA Sets the distance coordinate from an angle and position that gives the illusion of 3rd person, in reality first person perspective is the exact same thing an illusion, the camera is simply stuffed inside the avatar you control)
When you perform climbing feats, and perform other actions, this already happens,
I actually do 3d model animations in a character studio creator, and moving the camera is as easy as it sounds.
Download a free trial of unity and play around with it, its pretty fun stuff.
The only issue would be if the devs only animated the characters hands or something which would make 3rd person look awkward for Gore kills but it would not break the game.
So at worse some gore kill animations might need to be redone but certainly not the entire game.
It depends on the engine they are built upon really and for CP2077 it probably has more to do with the mod breaking the game since mods are not always designed in a way that best coincides with the infrastructure.
I'm just saying its not as hard as you are trying to imply it out to be, its not, Its actually very simple.
Again I shall reiterate, all it does is moves the global positioning of the character view from inside the avatar to outside of it, if you are introducing something unnatural to the code like a mod, yes that can break things, but to simply take the original camera and move it a few feet back with the ability to zoom in and out for tight caves is not a major deal, adding a zoom to the camera that collapses inwards back into the character is also not hard to do, its essentially a tag line and camera simply follows it.
The original demo for the game showed it in a 3rd person perspective, so naturally people are probably seeing that and wondering why it isn't implemented, it also makes platforming a lot easier if there will be such a thing.
3rd person is very unlikely to break the game, I don't know why you are so vehemently against it, its probably already in the game just not for the demo.
Personally I like having 3rd person since it makes it less likely you get blind sided by swarms of enemies from the sides or behind, in first person you have many blind spots.
Of course different camera settings would be nice, but Madmind said no, so it's probably not as easy as you say.
Because you still failed to realize that my first comment destroys your entire argument.
I shall reiterate since you missed it the first couple times I stated it.
All a 3rd person view does is takes the existing camera that is stuffed inside your character you control, and moves it behind that character.
It in no way would break the game, it would only make animations look awkward if the devs were extremely lazy and did not animate anything other than what you see on screen from your character, which is probably why they are saying no because they do not want to put any extra effort into making those animations. I can speculate this could be the case behind their refusal.
Its fine if you want to simp yourself for your devs but at least know what you're talking about first when trying to argue in their favor.
But for a game that has been in the making for many years now, thats a bit disappointing really.
I'm still irritated with the raspy "Rita Repulsa" voice the Succubus sounds like.
Succubi are supposed to sound Serene and Alluring, not like an 80 yr old woman with emphysema. They are creatures designed to lure in with false security then drain life energy or souls once trapped within their embrace.
It would be more fitting to call her a Lilum or "The" Lilith in her current state. To me shes just a generic looking demon.
You sound very upset, is everything okay over there buddy?