Sons of the forest is a bad game

[Minemord]

Nope this is not a joke, well partially, but when it comes to optimisation the devs could have done it beter, so thats why compared to the forest, sons of the forest is a bad game.

[Caesar]

If you expect the same performance/fps (using the same system) between The Forest & Sons Of The Forest then you're ignorant.
Sons Of The Forest is more demanding but also much better looking (it's using more modern graphic features, is much more detailed etc etc).

If you got a somewhat decent PC, you shouldn't run into any performance issues.

[Spaceman Spiff]

Sons-of-the-Forest-is-a-bad-game post number 8,679. Welcome to the party, pal.

[Minemord]

Originally posted by Caesar:

If you expect the same performance/fps (using the same system) between The Forest & Sons Of The Forest then you're ignorant.
Sons Of The Forest is more demanding but also much better looking (it's using more modern graphic features, is much more detailed etc etc).

If you got a somewhat decent PC, you shouldn't run into any performance issues.

I am not talking about that

[Caesar]

Then I am not sure what you're trying to say.

[Ozzys_Dad]

Originally posted by Minemord:

Originally posted by Caesar:

If you expect the same performance/fps (using the same system) between The Forest & Sons Of The Forest then you're ignorant.
Sons Of The Forest is more demanding but also much better looking (it's using more modern graphic features, is much more detailed etc etc).

If you got a somewhat decent PC, you shouldn't run into any performance issues.

I am not talking about that

You stated it's a bad game due to optimization. What else is anyone supposed to think you are talking about?

[LILI]

Opening a new thread for making such a short statement, seen soooo many times, and without really giving any analysis ...
Well, when I read the posts you made: they are between 3 letters long up to an average of 7 or 8 words.
It is borderline provocative, or just trolling. It is not worth the watts consumed by the servers hosting all this.

[Maviba]

No, it's not a bad game. You are just a bad player

[HomeInvasionTurbo]

overpriced for 44$ no wonder more folks want updates, seriously 44$ is insane.

[Minemord]

I mean the price is one thing, i bought the game in early access and ngl the game does feel emptier and is more boring than the forest even though theoreticaly the forest got less content

[Noctoculus]

The first game consistently has more players. The devs dropped Sons like hot garbage.

[Sholomar]

Optimization? Never had a problem. Stop using 6-8GB VRAM video cards in 2025. You won't get any better performance out of TLOU Part 1, Alan Wake, STALKER 2, Avatar, or any other AAA game released these days.

I had my fun with this game but I put so many hours into my one save I probably will never play it again. Plus the devs are gone from it.

[SammyLitch]

nah hes right optimisation is straight ass, its got a memory leak or something, my fps drops dramatically after 10 minutes of playtime and I have a pretty good pc.

[Caesar]

Originally posted by SammyLitch:

nah hes right optimisation is straight ass, its got a memory leak or something, my fps drops dramatically after 10 minutes of playtime and I have a pretty good pc.

Define "pretty good PC".
Because I never had the issue you mentioned (memory leak/fps drop after few minutes of playing).

[Ernie]

love sons love the forest too i don't think either is a bad game

[SammyLitch]

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core Processor 3.89 GHz
Msi 3080 10gb
Installed on an ssd
32gb ram

Had to download an updated dlss file and replace the one that sotf has to get it to stay stable, only done a little more testing but we'll see if it continues