PvE mods and PvP mods and show for us roadmap

[vlasmy]

I dont think only PvE mods is enough. PvE is good, but we also need PvP mods and more challenge, cause it will help the game develop and bring variety, is more fun and make more interesting situation. For PvE i think need some hardcore mods, for example u cant see ur team and no hud.
For example:
pvp mod 1 - two teams of patients get on the map and the team that can complete the tasks first and, for example, take out the reward from the territory will win and survive. Second team just get some chanse too escape, but its will be more harder. Give the opportunity to interfere with the other team and do nasty things and traps. (something like the TV series the squid game)

pvp mod 2 - classic 4 players and maniac, but there need to find a good balance and experiment. but dont do like DBD....need to take the best, but not take the bad things from them.

pvp mod 3 - For example, there are 4-8 players on the map, but only one can remain alive and escape. sounds like hardcore challenge.

for sure we need more trials, more storys, some secrets, more maniacs & psycho, maybe collaborations (for example michael maers or leatherface etc), maybe little bit some paranormal (outlast 1 like), social interactions in the lobby, and season events. We need more content, cause now is not enough, afraid we so quckly can get bored.

maybe have another ideas how to make better?

[vlasmy]

🌸𝒱𝒾𝑒𝓇𝒶🌸님이 먼저 게시:

Yea, no thanks, pvp is boring and is so redundant. I hope they give us more pve content though, that's what i'd like to see. More Acts, more variety in enemies, new rigs, new skills, new cosmetics.

pve is not enough for this game. i didnt said we need only pvp. Is will be better if they add also pvp. i wanna play pve mods and pvp mods.

[vlasmy]

Vantus님이 먼저 게시:

My humble opinion - cheesy Crossovers would ruin the sanctity of Outlast.
Outlast is it's own thing with it's own lore, enemies, corporations, conspiracies etc.

Throwing in Jason X or Jigsaw will just make a mockery of it all.
It'll make Red Barrels look like they don't have the imagination or writing capacity to create their own antagonists and have to dip into pop-culture to fill a creative void.

it's Outlast, not Smash Bros.
And as much as I hate to mention the constant "DBD clone" drivel, adding pop-culture crossover enemies will just reinforce that, almost to the point that they'd be correct.

Again, just my humble, passionate opinion.

i dont wanna outlast to be like DBD. i wanna there PvE and PvP, but better and balnce.

[vlasmy]

superman님이 먼저 게시:

How would a pvp killer vs surviors even work in outlast? How is it going to be balanced? It's one thing for an AI to be killer, it's a whole other world to have a player sweating his ass off killing survivors... And how would it not end up being like DBD? Why wouldn't I just play that? It's not outlast anymore.

It's one thing to think it's a cool idea, but when you really think about it and how the gameplay mechanics would look in reality it doesn't make sense to me. Like for example outlast relies a lot on night vision where AI killers can't see you, are sweaty humans going be running in the pitch black dark? The objective camping is gonna be WAAAAY worse aswell, The reality of mechanics seems at odds with what outlast is, I say keep it to the PVE horror.

i belive is can be work, they just need find balance thats all. thats not mine job man. And they have plans about pvp mods u can check. they have the same ideas like mine.

[Vantus]

vlasmy🎃님이 먼저 게시:

i belive is can be work, they just need find balance thats all. thats not mine job man. And they have plans about pvp mods u can check. they have the same ideas like mine.

Where have you seen them confirm plans for PVP?
If you are talking about the presence of PVP questions on the survey, that is not confirmation that they are working on PVP. It's a questionnaire to gauge interest in certain features.

Just like how they had a section asking about potential cross-overs. It doesn't mean it's happening. It's to gauge their audience and I for one wrote on the survey that I would not like to see Outlast Trials turn into a PVP game.

[vlasmy]

Vantus님이 먼저 게시:

vlasmy🎃님이 먼저 게시:

i belive is can be work, they just need find balance thats all. thats not mine job man. And they have plans about pvp mods u can check. they have the same ideas like mine.

Where have you seen them confirm plans for PVP?
If you are talking about the presence of PVP questions on the survey, that is not confirmation that they are working on PVP. It's a questionnaire to gauge interest in certain features.

Just like how they had a section asking about potential cross-overs. It doesn't mean it's happening. It's to gauge their audience and I for one wrote on the survey that I would not like to see Outlast Trials turn into a PVP game.

bro why not add here pvp mod? what the problem with that? why not use pve and pvp together. If u get bored in pve lets go pvp, if u get bored in pvp lets go in pve. why not? did u play left4dead ? there is pve and pvp live together. outlas is just totally need pvp. if no pvp and only pve....i dont think thats game will live a long time. Cause AI is not a perfect far away. im for sure they add pvp mods for experiment, they make this game for experiment. and yeah if they asking in survey 3 times about pvp mods its make sense. means they have plans.

[Vantus]

vlasmy🎃님이 먼저 게시:

bro why not add here pvp mod? what the problem with that? why not use pve and pvp together. If u get bored in pve lets go pvp, if u get bored in pvp lets go in pve.

Because it's not what they set out to do and it'll dilute the game development into 2 halves meaning less effort will be placed on PVE content - the core of the game. It also opens up the a can of worms with balancing PVE mechanics in PVP modes.

Everyone's entitled to like what they like by why take something unique like Outlast Trials and turn it into yet another generic, Twitch-bait, hacker-infused, toxic playground like all the rest in the genre.

vlasmy🎃님이 먼저 게시:

and yeah if they asking in survey 3 times about pvp mods its make sense. means they have plans.:griefer:

That doesn't confirm that they have plans. It's a blanket survey to gauge their player base.
Survey's always have weird questions.

[Tuna Wrap]

good idea. they should make a competetive pvp game mode where you have to shoot each other with different kinds of guns (and they all have unique recoil patterns)

[invision2212]

no PVP its not needed

[MM-fantasten]

I mean there is already a ton of alternatives for pvp horror games. The pve aspect is part of the selling point of the game. Also, as other comments have said, the game isn't made for pvp and making it that would take away time that could be spent on making more pve content.

[vlasmy]

Harald 3 March님이 먼저 게시:

good idea. they should make a competetive pvp game mode where you have to shoot each other with different kinds of guns (and they all have unique recoil patterns)

wat? noooo

[vlasmy]

invision2212님이 먼저 게시:

no PVP its not needed

need if u wanna thats game live longer time like a leaft4dead. pvp and pve 100% need

[vlasmy]

Big Purjo님이 먼저 게시:

I mean there is already a ton of alternatives for pvp horror games. The pve aspect is part of the selling point of the game. Also, as other comments have said, the game isn't made for pvp and making it that would take away time that could be spent on making more pve content.

yep, pve coop is good, but also need pvp. Cause somtimes im bored in PvE. play team vs team is will be more fun. for example just complete the task faster than the other team. why not? is more fun and more challenge.

[>< V ><]

vlasmy🎃님이 먼저 게시:

Big Purjo님이 먼저 게시:

I mean there is already a ton of alternatives for pvp horror games. The pve aspect is part of the selling point of the game. Also, as other comments have said, the game isn't made for pvp and making it that would take away time that could be spent on making more pve content.

yep, pve coop is good, but also need pvp. Cause somtimes im bored in PvE. play team vs team is will be more fun. for example just complete the task faster than the other team. why not? is more fun and more challenge.

"WE" need PVP because "YOU" are bored?

What are you? American?

[vlasmy]

>< V ><님이 먼저 게시:

vlasmy🎃님이 먼저 게시:

yep, pve coop is good, but also need pvp. Cause somtimes im bored in PvE. play team vs team is will be more fun. for example just complete the task faster than the other team. why not? is more fun and more challenge.

"WE" need PVP because "YOU" are bored?

What are you? American?

not american. are u nazi? yeah if u wanna thats game will live more longer time thre is need pvp also. pve and pvp can live together man. is a normal...whats problem with u?

[vlasmy]

Vantus님이 먼저 게시:

Sorry for the double post but in the interest of saying something positive to offset the negative:

I wouldn't be opposed to different game modes so long as they retained Co-op.

For example, I'd actually love some game modes or map variants where players are cut off from eachother into sections and they must move Key Items from one end of the map to the other by players passing them through small holes or dumbwaiters. Like the button-cages for passing film reels in the Orphanage.

That way players have to co-ordinate and pass the parcel in order to escape.

Alternatively, have players progress through the map by pulling levers to open gates for eachother. Sometimes when a gate opens, an enemy is released as well.

Something along these lines would be pretty cool.

yep, also nice challenge for PvE