Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
France: Napoleon III, less able but more successful than Napoleon I.
USA: James Polk, who increased the territory of the US by more than any other president.
England: Henry V, one of the few true warrior kings of human history.
Greece: Count Capodistrias, the first regent of Greece.
Byzantium: Basil II, the most badass of all Byzantine emperors.
Rome: Vespasian, who would take no nonsense.
Germany: Otto the Great, the first Holy Roman Emperor.
- Urho Kekkonen
- Mannerheim, Carl Gustaf Emil
I only accept Pedro I as a complementary leader, and still would be more fair put him for both Brazil and Portugal (where he was crowned Pedro IV), as Leonor of Aquitaine was for England and France.
And no republican leaders, please! They are or incompentents or authoritarian.
Would also like to see the Persians under Xerxes, just to tickle my "role play as the villain" itch.