Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"As said above, TASM combines the Harpoon seeker with the warhead from Bullpup, and lacks the advanced terrain contour matching of the land attack versions. All anti-ship missiles are susceptible to crashing into terrain. As for AI line of sight check, that is indeed an oversight and we will fix it."
the TASM is supposed to be able to follow waypoints and go as high as 450m, so even if it doesn't have "terrain following" you could still send it up in the air for the first part and then make a sea skimming waypoint for the second part to go over a mountain manually
What I posted was a response to that. You're welcome.
The only case I could think of is where range is a factor preventing you from plotting waypoints around the terrain. The missile will be much more survivable hiding behind the terrain and taking a sea approach, than popping up over a hill on a land route.