Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
BL2 was one planet and had more variety than BL3.
Having multiple planets just falls into the trap of that planet having a theme and all those maps feel samey.
THIS.
Id it just me or it looks like Elpis is going (or creating) into some kind of 'dimensional tear'?
Discussion and speculation is one thing, but seeing two screenshots and being like "this game is going to take place on a single planet, because I saw a single planet, and will also have only two characters: a Bandit mask and a robot arm" is a bit wild, wouldn't you say
imo there's still too many unknown unreleased info about b4 locations, so i think people should not speculate too deeply and wait patiently to avoid misinformation and overhyping.
Now, people who get butthurt when their speculations are wrong, that is a problem.
I'm not so fragile as the person whose first thought is leaving when they don't like something
This would be a godsend, but I highly doubt they'd do it. Borderlands doesn't really fit a FULLY open-planet design. Now Starfield on the other hand.... that's a different story.
"On an all-new planet"